Preview

Within the Context of 1789-1890, Was the Unification of Germany a Result of Economic, Political or Military Forces?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3897 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Within the Context of 1789-1890, Was the Unification of Germany a Result of Economic, Political or Military Forces?
Within the context of 1789-1890, was the unification of Germany a result of economic, political or military forces?

Numerous factors have lead to the progressive creation of a unified Germany by 1871; such factors are fundamentally related to economic, political or military origins. To accurately understand the reasoning behind the unification, one must look at the history preceding it – The after-effects of the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire; The significance of the French revolutions and Napoleonic Wars on Germanic national identity; the degradation of Austria’s national power; the introduction of the Zollverein in 1834 and the Prussian economic superiority that followed in addition to the industrialisation of the German states all contribute towards economic and political factors relating to the formation of a unified Germany under Prussia’s direction. Military factors contributing towards the unification of Germany include the defeat and exile of Napoleon Bonaparte; Otto Von Bismarck’s foreign policy based strongly around ‘realpolitik’; the significance of the ‘New Model Army’ on Prussia’s military prominence in addition to the conclusive Franco-Prussian war.

The Germanic region is immersed in a rich cultural heritage extending back, within the context of recorded history to a wild, untamed land coupled with the indomitable spirit of the indigenous people who populated it. Numerous tribes took residence within Germania including but not limited to the Saxons, Franks and Chatti. Several centuries on, the Frankish territories within Germania had spread across the Central European landmass under the tactical prowess of Charlemagne to encompass large parts of Western Europe and Northern Italy, thus forming “Teutonicorum” or “Germanic Realm”. This newly formed empire was later consolidated by Otto the Great to become the Holy Roman Empire and is considered by numerous historians as the formation of the First Reich. The period from 936 C.E onwards saw the



Bibliography: 1. Voltaire, “Essai sur l’histoire generale et sur les moeurs et l’espirit des nations,” 1756 2. August Fournier: Napoleon I., eine Biographie. Drei Bände, 4. Aufl. Wien/Leipzig 1922; hier Bd. 2, S. 307. 3. Heinrich von Treitschke, verbal statement – Wikipedia. 4. William Carr (A History of Germany 1815-1990) 5. The Balance of Power- History and Theory - Craig and George, 1990: 38 6. Hamerow, Theodore "Guilt, Redemption and Writing German History" pages 53-72 from The American Historical Review 7. "Mistaken Lessons from the Past", The Listener (June 6, 1963)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Germany was not a unified country until 1871; before that, industry developed predominantly in the powerful states such as Prussia.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When he starts war with France he unifies Germany and changes name from German Confederation states to Germany in…

    • 3184 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution consisted of 25 federal states, within this there were 4 kingdoms, 12 Duchies, 6 Grand Duchies and 3 free cities. At first the Kaiser had pretty much entire control over all of these states however at this point the Kaiser had great control over each of these states, however each one did have a government which could decide healthcare system, education and justice policies. The states were at this point happy with this situation so on the whole they were content to remain part of Germany.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How successful was Bismarck in maintaining his political control in Germany in the years 1878 to 1890?…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bizmarck

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Certain motivating political and economic factors enabled Germany to gain its unification in the late nineteenth century. Its economic prosperity from the zollverein, technological advances, and political moves in terms of actions allowed it to ultimately acquire a solid unification by 1871.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1866, the North German Confederation was formed and Austria was to be permanently excluded from the affairs of the Kleindeutschland. It is possible to say that Prussia’s victory over its long term rival was due to its economic strength and relative stability of their society in comparison with Austria. However, in doing so, we would need to acknowledge that the Crimean War and the Hungarian uprisings had left Austria friendless and virtually destitute coffers, making their defeat all the more inevitable. Charismatic and talented individuals also paved the way to Prussian ascendancy in 1866: Bismarck’s ability to exploit political situations to suit his needs; William I and Roons’ intentions on reforming the Army bill, all of which were part of the events that can be said as reasons of the resulting Prussian dominance.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This exam is a reflection on the German state, and how it came to be, as well as a look into the actual obstacles that Bismarck had to overcome in order to join the Germanic states in to one, solid German nation. This will be accomplished by focusing on significant people and significant political and economic views that they held to show the differing positions in 1848 – 1849, and by looking at pertinent facts in the 1850s. This will also focus greatly on Otto von Bismarck, who is the man most credited with bringing the thirty-seven Germanic states under one flag, and instilling in the people a sense of nationalism (adding yet another facet to the German people, among radical…

    • 3151 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historiographical debate of Bismarck’s impact upon Germany began almost immediately following his rise to prominence, as the primary initial historiography within Germany demanded a “strong man”[1], “who would cut the Gordian knot of nationalistic aspirations”.[2] Thus, German historians and the public throughout the 1850s and 1860s desired Bismarck to be portrayed as a benefactor to the German society; however Bismarck was also criticised as being detrimental to the development of Germany. The differing interpretations of Bismarck throughout the 1980s were “between the kleindeutsche and groβdeutshe historians”.[3] As the kleindeutsche historians argued that the unification was a “natural birth”, the groβdeutshe viewed it as a “caesarean section”.[4] The kleindeutshe school of though was largely composed of nationalist historians Heinrich von Sybel and Treitschke. Treitschke argued that the…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strachey, Lytton. "Voltaire and Frederick the Great." Books and Characters, French & English,. New York: Harcourt, Brace and, 1922. 167-99. Print.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1862, Bismarck said that ‘the great questions of the day will be settled by blood and iron.’ Although there is undoubtedly some degree of accuracy in this statement, the most important reason for the unification of Germany, which ended ‘the great questions of the day,’ was ‘coal and iron.’ This is a quote from British economist John Maynard Keynes, who argued that the industrial and economic preparation before the wars, which united Germany, were more important. This is because the economic strength created by the rapid industrialisation enabled the creation of a powerful Prussia. It was under this powerful Prussia, with some skilful diplomacy and opportunism, that Germany was successfully united in the wars of German Unification. Without such economic development and prosperity, it is questionable whether Germany would have been united by 1871. On the other hand we must also consider the other factors and thus must address five key areas. The first of these is the growing strength of Prussia in relation to Austria and closely linked to this is the economic developments within Prussia. On a much larger scale we must also take into account the strength of nationalism and the international situation of the 1860s. Lastly, we must consider whether the policies and strategies of Otto Von Bismarck, the Minister-President of Prussia from 1862 had a major impact on the Unification of Germany in 1871, nevertheless we are justified by saying that the main reason for the unification of Germany in 1871 was due to the economic prowess of Prussia in relation to other foreign nations such as Austria.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bismarck Research Paper

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In January 1871 King William first of Prussia became Kaiser William the first of the new German empire. The creation of the empire was one of the most important developments of the nineteenth century. However, the process by which Germany came to be unified has been and area of heated historical debate ever since. There are many people and events to consider in weighing up contributions to unification, but no one man was more central to the process of unification than Otto Von Bismarck. Bismarck became chancellor of Prussia in 1962 and his main aim was to unify the 39 German states under Prussian rule. Some historians…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the years before the war, around 1848-1914, the period of Nationalism began, where each country was unifying their states. These states wanted national identity, meaning similar language, mission, religion, territory, etc. The German unifier was the chancellor of Prussia, known as Otto Von Bismark. He was a very romantic nationalist and believed in the quote "might makes right", believing that you get what you want through force. He was very powerful and it showed in the three steps he took to unify the country of Germany. He won the war with Denmark in 1864, won the Autro/Prussian war in 1866, and won the war of 1871, finally unifying the country on January 18, 1871.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Franco-Prussian war of 1870 acted as a watershed in European history with the formation of the German Empire. No power alone, (perhaps with the exception of Russia) could defeat the new German Empire, and all the European powers with the exception of France were willing to allow Bismarck to consolidate German gains provided there was no further expansion. Bismarck having successfully won the Franco-Prussian war of 1870 and having united Germany, sought to ‘preserve the settlement of 1871’ by maintaining the status of the German empire as a great power amongst the European nations and avoiding conflict. Between 1871- 1890 Bismarck presided as the chancellor and introduced a variety of foreign and domestic policies in the hope of keeping Germany a great power. At home, he concentrated on building a powerful German state and encouraged nationalism and the ideal of a German national identity. In foreign affairs his goal was to make Prussia the dominant power in the German Empire, and to establish the empire as a great power in Europe. Through various alliance systems he managed to accomplish this aim. His resignation in 1890 marked the end of the Bismarckian system and ushered in the Wilehenmne era. This essay will set out to explore the extent to which Bismarck’s successors, William II, Leo von Caprivi, Hohenlohe and Bülow, changed his policy in the decade 1890-1900.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays