Preview

How Successful Was Bismarck in Maintaining His Political Control in Germany in the Years 1878 to 1890?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1949 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Successful Was Bismarck in Maintaining His Political Control in Germany in the Years 1878 to 1890?
How successful was Bismarck in maintaining his political control in Germany in the years 1878 to 1890? Bismarck set about trying to achieve his political objects by always siding with the party that would help him facilitate his needs. The years from 1871 to 1878 were known as Bismarck’s “Liberal Era” because Bismarck was sided with the National Liberal Party. He sided with the liberals and appeased them by introducing a number of reforms. He created a single currency the Mark; he set up the Reichstag Bank. Bismarck also abolished internal tariffs within the empire, standardised commercial law and other legal proceedings.
The reason that Bismarck was allied with the Liberals was not because he believed in Liberal ideologies, far from that. Bismarck sided with the liberals at this point in time because they were the largest party in the Reichstag and he needed their support to introduce his administrative reforms and help launch the Kulturkampf. After 1878, Bismarck no longer needed the support of the Liberals so he cut ties from them. Bismarck had a new enemy; he had set his sights upon The SPD, the Socialists. Carr noted that “Socialism, like Catholicism had allegiances beyond the Nation state which Bismarck could neither understand nor tolerate.” The whole of Europe was already fearful of the events that took place within Paris, and even though the socialists were hastily quashed, they managed to overthrow a major European power albeit for a very short period of time. Socialism was on the rise in Germany, and Bismarck was unhappy with this as the current order was under threat. In order to attack the Socialists, Bismarck now needed to set up ties with a different political party on the spectrum and this was the Conservatives. Bismarck learned to a certain extent that he could not use his “Blood and Iron” approach like he did with the Catholics; he needed to take a much more subtle and less outright oppressive approach. As Germany was becoming more and more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Within the context of 1789-1890, was the unification of Germany a result of economic, political or military forces?…

    • 3897 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal on Bismarck’s ship wheel is shown telling the conservative and ultramontane, who is a Catholic, that he will indeed be on top again when the wind blows Bismarck. This document shows how Bismarck is a new type of conservative who forsakes some traditional values in order to do follow the realpolitik value of doing what’s best for the country. In order to do what’s best for the country, Bismarck sometimes has to change sides in order to keep the peace and unite Germany. In Kaiser Wilhelm I’s speech to the people of Berlin in November 1881 (Document 5), Wilhelm I talks about his support for Bismarck’s new welfare reforms that support Christianity and incorporate socialism. Document 5 shows how Bismarck has had to move away from his goal of suppressing the Church in order to do what’s best for the country, which is supporting Christianity. Nevertheless, Wilhelm I does hold a bias as he is a puppet of Bismarck who lets Bismarck implant his new conservative reforms as long as they keep the peace, which is why he is supporting the reforms and tying God and the country together. Document 6 is Otto von Bismarck’s 1884 speech in support of his new bill that helps socialist, but stays true to conservative values but not forsaking his and the…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heyo potao

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890).…

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government policies represented a new kind of conservatism where Bismarck valued traditional ways but also advocated for idealistic reforms aligned with socialism. However, he was still criticized by both conservatives and socialists, arguing that Bismarck was too much of a socialist but still not liberal…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Dbq

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He quickly learned how to play the uber Catholic, conservative, and liberal sides when needed, and he eventually learned how to balance his policies so that each side remained fairly contained (Doc 4). During the 1800s, talk of liberal reforms, socialism, and communism was rising. Many people in the German government realized this insurgent of new thoughts and encouraged Bismarck to modify his policies. Politicians such as Wagener in document three wrote to audiences in the Reichstag and even Bismarck himself because the politicians knew that they could not risk losing the worker’s votes to the Socialist Party who promised laborers their own rights and insurance (Doc 3). Bismarck realized his politicians spoke the truth. From Bismarck’s point of view, he knew that if he didn’t adapt at least some version of these rising demands, he would remain Chancellor for a very short time. Thus, when it came to social reforms, Bismarck adopted his own version of the socialist party’s platform. He stated he would compromise by taking on some socialistic reforms because those reforms were a way to help those who cannot help themselves (Doc 6). Even the Kaiser himself realized his government must make their own approach to social reform. Bismarck promoted accident coverage for laborers and welfare for people who do not have the ability to work-- all ideas sprung from moderate…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany: Otto Von Bismark

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Otto von Bismarck was one of the three most important political figures in Germany, besides Martin Luther and Adolph Hitler. Prior to World War I, Bismark contributed to and maintained Germany as an international power. In order to maintain Germany as an international power, Bismark’s overall first concern was to keep France isolated to prevent any retribution from France. He prevented any military alliance with France. His second concern was that Austria-Hungary and Russia posed a threat to peace. Bismarck’s solution was to keep Russia and Ausrtia-Hungary close to him to try and prevent any conflict. Russia thought the Ottoman Empire were the “sick man of Europe,” and was negative towards the empire. This worried Bismarck, because he wanted to maintain peace between two enemies, Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Bismarck’s efforts at the Conference of Berlin (1878), angered Russian nationalists which made Bismarck enter a military alliance with Austria against Russia. This alliance ultimately lasted until the end of World War I. Since Italy was on bad terms with France, they were motivated to join Germany. This created the Triple Alliance. Bismarck remained fearful about tensions…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Napoleon's tragedy was that his ambitions surpassed his capacities; Bismarck's tragedy was that his capacities exceeded his society's ability to absorb them. The legacy Napoleon left for France was strategic paralysis; the legacy the Bismarck left for Germany was unassimilable greatness"(statement made by Henry Kissinger) is in my opinion a correct statement. This statement can actually be separated into two parts. The first parts relates with the capacities, ambitions and successes of Bismarck and Napoleon. The second part is about the final result of their reign and how their reigns could be taken over after such changing of Europe.…

    • 2108 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Prussia realized Germany’s vulnerability, seeing how its loose union and its central geographical spot in the continent made it vulnerable to attack from strong neighbors like France and Russia. So, Prussia set out to unify Germany to form one large, stronger state. However, this unification could not have been possible without Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian noble who had risen through the ranks to become a major political figure and the driving force behind German unification. The question is begged, however: how did Bismarck do it? How did he rise to power and unite these fragmented pieces into one union? Well, for one, Bismarck had connections. A noble by birth, Bismarck had high social standing, but no governmental or military background that would facilitate a career in politics. Nonetheless, he befriended two military generals by the names of Helmut von Moltke and Albrecht von Roon. Moltke and Roon, both cunning military minds and dedicated ideologues, rose up the Prussian power ladder. In 1859, Roon was appointed minister of war, allowing him a direct link to the king. A strong believer in Bismarck’s potential, Roon lobbied the king to appoint Bismarck to a high post. It was a success, and in September 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president. Now that Bismarck had reached high office, it was up to him to use his power wisely. This is where Bismarck’s political cunning comes into play. Soon after receiving his position, Bismarck began winning the king over. Within a short while, Bismarck…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kulturkampf, was an attempt by Bismarck, to suppress the Catholic Church, he feared that because the German Empire established in 1871 had a substantial minority of Catholics that their loyalty to Rome would conflict with their loyalty to the empire. Consequently he conducted a struggle with the Catholics, by the May laws of 1873-5 education was bought under state control and state approval was required for the licensing of priests. Bismarck’s anti-Catholic campaign backfired after the Catholic Centre Party made gains in the Reichstag elections of 1874 and 1877. And since Bismarck required their support against the Liberals over tariffs, he toned down the Kulturkampf and removed some of the May Laws. However, once Wilhelm II was Kaiser the differences between the state and the church were set aside in an attempt to oppose socialism at all cost,…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Otto von Bismarck is widely recognized as the statesman who engineered the unification of Germany in this period, via astute political awareness, cunning diplomacy and the use of effective military power. However many historians have different views with regard to Bismarck’s real influence and even whether he wanted German unification or just expansion of the power and influence of his home state of Prussia. Bismarck has been described a great statesman, but also an autocrat who resented any opposition to his views . In contrast it has also been suggested that he was merely an astute politician who enhanced the position of his home state of Prussia, through clever management of the internal and external political circumstances that he lived through . This enquiry will attempt to assess the importance of Bismarck’s role in the unification of Germany by identifying and reviewing key historical events in the period 1789-1890.…

    • 4333 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The political structure of Germany emphasised the divisions caused by Bismarck’s constitution, particularly the lower houses of German parliament: the Reichstag. The Reichstag had influence over areas such as financial affairs and the constitutional position of the Reichstag meant that the Kaiser required their support to pass government legislation.. Known as the ‘lower house’ of parliament, it was made up of a group of representatives, consisting of 8 major political parties, elected every five years by men over the age of 25 in a secret ballot. Though this balloting system showed relative equality allowing all males to vote, in reality the make up of the Reichstag was corrupted. In 1878 under Bismarck laws had been introduced that aimed to curb the socialists (including outlawing the Social Democratic party) reducing left-wing power and therefore the government could rely on the backing of the right wing: Deutschkonservative Partei (German…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1871 marked the start of the new German Empire with Wilhelm I as Kaiser and Otto von Bismarck as chancellor. The National Liberals wanted a democratic constitution, which would limit the power of the Kaiser and give more power to the people of Germany by allowing them to vote. Despite his traditional conservative views, Bismarck joined the National Liberals in order to fulfil his wish for a strong, united Germany.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays