Preview

Why Is The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1481 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Necessary
“The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a necessary evil to end the Second World War.” To what extent do you agree with the statement? Explain your answer.

I agree with the statement to a large extent. World War II is known for acts of heroism on both sides, as well as controversial decisions. One major event that has long been debated was the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The political landscape before the bomb was dropped prevented a Japanese surrender. The war would have taken much longer had an invasion been attempted. An invasion would have cost more lives for both sides than the bombings. The Allies were justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I agree with the statement as the bombing was the most viable way to force the Japanese to surrender. The Allied offer of the Potsdam Conference on July 26, 1945 stipulated that the war would end only when the Japanese surrendered and gave up Emperor Hirohito. This offer was completely unacceptable to the Japanese, who, at the time, regarded their emperor as a god. President Harry S Truman was in a situation where he could not change the …show more content…
Even scientists who worked on the bomb were against using it and said: “If the U.S. were the first to release this new means of indiscriminate destruction upon mankind, she would sacrifice public support throughout the world, precipitate the race for armaments, and prejudice the possibility of reaching an international agreement on the future control of such weapons.” Using such a policy of indiscriminate murder to shorten the war is morally wrong. In the opinion of the court, the act of dropping an atomic bomb on cities was at the time governed by international law found in the Hague Regulations on Land Warfare of 1907 and the Hague Draft Rules of Air Warfare of 1922–1923 and was therefore
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Japanese War In World War II?
    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Japanese War In World War II?

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Harry Truman Justified Essay
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was Harry Truman Justified Essay

    President Harry Truman is justified for sending atomic bombs from the United States to Japan civilian cities. Two parts of Japan in particular named Hiroshima and Nagasaki were targeted to kill off the civilians. The bombs were supposed to target a certain range of people, the hiroshima ranged from 90,000 to 146,000 and the Nagasaki ranged from 39,000 to 80,000 deaths. These bombs initiated the action of surrender from Japan and this happened on August 15, 1945. There are documents that prove Harry Truman should be justified for the participation in winning the war for the United States.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harry Truman Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harry Truman Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harry S. Truman's Life And Legacy
    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Harry S. Truman's Life And Legacy

    cannot be supported by any conclusive evidence that Truman's method was beneficial. Truman misrepresented the estimated casualty figures and did not explore any other methods. Therefore Truman was not justified in dropping the atomic bombs over…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    If The Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used Rhetorical Analysis
    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If The Atomic Bomb Had Not Been Used Rhetorical Analysis

    Karl T. Compton builds his argument in hopes to appeal to the audience's emotional standpoint or pathos. Compton’s use of pathos was evident on the first page third paragraph in which he wrote “ I believe, that the atomic bombs saved hundreds of thousands- perhaps several millions- of lives, both American and Japanese..” This specific quote justifies the act of the droppings of these bombs because he is implying that the bombings were not wrongful.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do You Think That Americans Problematic Racial History Affected the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do You Think That Americans Problematic Racial History Affected the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

    They in my opinion should have restricted the bombing to the opposing soldiers and not killed civilians. The retaliation mentality that they had created the illusion that killing thousands upon thousands of people would equalize what had happened on Pearl Harbor and is a reasonable response. There were fatalities of both parties that should never have happened. The phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right” is true for this situation. Can we really rationalize the murders of all the people in world war two? Everyone’s lives that were lost from both sides didn't have to die.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Unbroken By Laura Hillenbrand
    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Unbroken By Laura Hillenbrand

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harry S. Truman Persuasive Essay
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Harry S. Truman Persuasive Essay

    There has always been a debate on the necessity of the bomb, but its implications were so severe that such an attack has never been carried out again. Through the Mock Trial, Harry S. Truman was put on trial for crimes against humanity. At the end of the three day trial, and after much deliberation the jury came to the decision that Harry S. Truman was guilty of crimes against humanity. I was not fully content with this decision, however, I am able to understand why the jury came to the decision that they made.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima Bombing
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima Bombing

    On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt's Adoption Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roosevelt's Adoption Of The Atomic Bomb

    Secondly the bomb was illegal to use (yes I said ILLEGAL). “On September 30th, 1938 the League Of Nations issued an unanimous resolution outlawing the intentional bomb of civilian population. In other words the League Of Nations agreed to outlaw the bomb to be used on civilian population. I think the League Of Nations was smart because bombing unarmed civilians is unethical.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Atom Bomb
    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Atom Bomb

    The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains among the most controversial events in modern history. Historians have actively debated whether the bombings were necessary. What effect they had on bringing the war in the Pacific to an end and what other options were available to the United States. As American policymakers struggled with how to use a powerful new technology and what the long-term impact of atomic weaponry might be, not just on the Japanese but on domestic politics and America’s international relations and the building of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. It is clear that the reasons for dropping the atomic bombs on Japan, with a variety of issues that went far beyond the simple goal of bringing World War II to an end. The atomic weapon was considered to be a new terrifying powerful explosive, as devastating as any other of the deadly explosive weapons of modern war. Had the war continued until the projected invasion on November 1, additional fire raids of B‑20’s would have been more destructive of life and property than the very limited number of atomic raids which we could have done in the same period. But the atomic bomb was more than a weapon of terrible destruction; it was a psychological weapon as well. The bomb served exactly the purpose we intended. The peace party was able to take the path of surrender and the whole weight of the Emperor’s prestige was in favor of peace. When the Emperor ordered surrender and the small but dangerous group of people who opposed him were brought under control, the Japanese became so controlled that the great undertaking and occupation and disarmament was completed with…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Justified
    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Hiroshima Bombing Justified

    First of all, Japan already knew they would not win against the Americans with or without the bomb. (Japanese War Minister,1963) This tells us that there was no point in dropping the bomb onto japan. There were also sources saying that the Americans just wanted to drop the bomb for a test since it wasn’t tested well. (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, 1985)This in my opinion is not a reason to kill 70,000 people in Japan. Truman who decided whether to drop the bomb or not did not think of the consequences of this atomic bomb properly since he made the decision in a snap of a finger. I think that this action was really inhumane and people should not make such quick decisions especially when they are dealing with atomic bombs which puts a lot of people’s lives at risk. The consequences included radiation and other mysterious sickens killing people even after months and years after the bomb was dropped. It has included diarrhea, purple spots on skin, vomiting etc. (A Japanese eye…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics