Preview

Why Is Media Important To Presidential Candidates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
272 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Media Important To Presidential Candidates
Since the 1990’s, president candidates have used the media in order to gain an advantage in their campaigns. Two such examples are their use of leaking information to the press, or seeking contributions through political action committees (PACS) and Super PACS. Leaking information to the press is known normally as a trial balloon. If a candidate’s management feels the need to break a story out and test the waters of the public’s reaction in order to change a policy under consideration, they would have a campaign worker intentionally give a reporter an “off the record” interview or quote on how the candidate feels. These trial balloons would almost always be leaked later in the workweek so that the press can come up with an agenda on how they would want to play out the story on the upcoming week. …show more content…
According to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, any group who provides a candidate with funding over $2,600 automatically becomes a PAC. In the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee Supreme Court case, it was decided that corporations have a First Amendment Constitutional right when giving money to campaigns, allowing them to essentially be able to donate millions of dollars to a candidate. Media corporations like Time Warner Cable and 21st Century Fox (CNN and FOX News respectively) can now contribute to a candidate through this Supreme Court ruling. These are two ways that candidates can manipulate the media in their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citizens United v. FEC allowed for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they wanted in order to convince the public either to vote for or against a candidate. They are protected by the First Amendment, which allows for them to have unlimited spending. However, the Supreme Court argued that it is illegal for corporations or labor unions to give money directly to candidate. The Supreme Court argued that if corporations or labor unions give money directly to a candidate, it could lead to corruption. Ultimately, I agree with the Supreme Court decision that it is illegal for them to do this and agree that they can persuade the public through other methods. For instance, corporations and labor unions can persuade the public through ads…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fec vs. Citizens United

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First Amendment has been one of the most controversial issues surrounding the Constitutions since its ratification in 1787. The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Many people disagree on the extent of power the First Amendment actually has on the right to free speech. One of the most controversial issues surrounding the First Amendment is how much influence a company can have over elections and campaigns. Huge corporations are known to pay billions of dollars to endorse certain politicians, and in turn the politicians pass legislation benefitting the corporation. Is this fair, or even legal? The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission dove right into the issue. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was an important United States Supreme Court case in which it was decided that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting political expenditures by corporations and unions. Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, produced a political controversial video on Senator Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 primary elections, known as Hillary: The Movie. The documentary covered Hillary Clinton's life while in the Senate, the White House as First Lady and during her bid for presidential Democratic nominee. However, the documentary falls within the definition of "electioneering communications" under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA")-a federal enactment designed to prevent "big money" from unfairly influencing federal elections. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that BCRA violated the First Amendment.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super PACs

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Super PACs or Super Political Action Committees are “a type of independent political action committee which may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, and individuals but is not permitted to contribute to or coordinate directly with parties or candidates” –Oxford Dictionaries…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) changed the system of political campaign contributions in the United States. In the close 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that organizations are allowed to make unlimited political donations. The Justices reached their decision using the First Amendment, which pertains to free speech. To state it plainly, money equals speech. Surely, the Justices in favor of the decision assumed that the donor groups or individuals would be truly independent of the candidates. However, they were wrong. A few wealthy individuals took advantage of the ruling and began to rev up their political contributions through a complex web of organizations. Now politicians armed…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problems with Super Pacs

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    $350 Million dollars. That’s the estimated amount of money spent during the 2012 election. An estimated $240 million of that is not even spent by candidates. The 2012 races has seen the greatest number of Political Action Committees (PACs) ever. These committees spent millions and millions of dollars to help candidates get elected, or legislature passed without regulation. What started as advocacy groups supporting a cause, has turned into big corporations protecting their money and their personal interests. PACs can be beneficial but without more regulation their corruption hurts our government more than help it. The term “Super PAC,” was coined by reporter Eliza Newlin Carney of the National Journal on June 26, 2010 (“What are SuperPACs?”). This was the new nickname of PACs with seemingly endless amounts of money.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP GOV

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leaks. By leaking information to the media, politicians often hope to change public attitude about a specific issue, bill, or position.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the major evolution of technology over the last decades now means all citizens can be publishers and are subject to media laws. Given the high reach and virtually unlimited frequency of the Internet, the source of all media sharing and broadcasting, content can streamed and opinions influenced within minutes of publishing material. An example of this can be seen with the United States presidential election, where presidential candidates like Ted Cruz, Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton have spent millions of dollars on advertisements with the sole purpose of defaming the opposing party leaders and the effects on polls can be seen within…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GARY MOD 5 ASSIGN

    • 697 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Asking what it was about the 1960 and 1980 campaigns that produced engagement on policy and useful governance is instructive. Both were close elections. And in close elections, the press and the candidates behave differently. Both candidates see advantage in providing the press and public with access. Increased, as a result, are well-publicized news conferences with the national press, participation in interview shows, and willingness to debate. At the same time, when the race is close the press makes better use of the access it is given. Press questions are more likely to focus on substance than strategy; and one candidate is not burdened with a greater percent of strategy questions than the other. (259)…

    • 697 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology 201 Study Guide

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PAC’s (Political Action Committees)-solicit contributions from many, and then use that large amount to influence…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every presidential election year tensions and tempers flare between opposing party supporters. This year’s election season was no different, perhaps even more volatile than years past. The popular phrase “lesser of two evils” was heard countless times throughout the election, denoting the nominees Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump to be the only available options, regardless of how ill received they were. The media played a monumental role in this election, basically framing out the nominees personalities which heavily influenced how voters perceieved them. The bias in the media was grossly transparent throughout the entire election, uplifting Clinton while dragging Trump’s name through the mud. The media’s perpetuation of false narratives…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Donald Trump's Rhetoric

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The tensions and distrust of Republican officials by the disenfranchised party members has provided the backdrop to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. In the current presidential election Republican candidate Donald Trump has been covered more extensively than any other candidate. Much of Donald Trump’s rhetoric are centered around shock value statements that make perfect controversial sound bites that are then repeatedly played on news channels, television shows, and posted online. According to an estimate by the New York Times the air time Donald Trump has received is worth over two billion dollars. Regardless of the fact that much of the coverage Trump has received the main value of all of that television coverage has been name recognition.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “5 Ways TV Has Influenced Presidential Elections”, Matt Sailor writes how “50 to 75 percent of a campaign’s funds are typically spent on ad production and airtime”(5). These television advertisements aren’t always focusing on America’s real issues, but often attack their opponent. This influences voters to attack the opponent because of an advertisement, which leads to a loss in votes. Furthermore, Sailor believes “news programs tend to center around the personal drama”(13). This gives the candidate a lot more stress to control the image voters see. If a candidate ever commits error, the candidate will eventually see a decrease in supporters because of news coverage. Evidently, TV is what decides if a campaign will be successful or…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is quite known that several different news outlets cover up information, as they believe it is too much for the public to handle. This type of information could vary from scandals, to events, to celebrities, and even people with authority. When this happens, the public begins to question the motives behinds the news, and whether or not they have been bribed. So, for the news to become more trustworthy, they must be more truthful, and open about what they choose to hide. According to an article by Jean Duffey called “The Media’s Role in Federal Government Cover-ups” Duffey may claim that the government control the media’s every move. However, when it comes to dealing with things non-related to the government, is when the media has the right to cover news their way. To Clarify, the media doesn’t have to be truthful about everything, only a majority of…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There has been much discussion about how mass media presents and can determine the outcome of presidential elections. The media has been accused of focusing on subjects such as the politician's personal life and their characteristics rather than looking at the political issues of the election. The voter's views can also be altered by political advertisements that do not focus on issues. This can cause the voters to believe that certain issues are important when in reality they are trivial concerns. Elections often become popularity contests because of the polling that is done by newspapers and TV news programs prior to the actual voting. Politicians then can have a difficult time guiding voter's opinions on their concerns.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays