Preview

Why Gun Control Won T End Mass Shootings Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Gun Control Won T End Mass Shootings Analysis
New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across. Tammy Bruce believes people should look at the underlying causes. Instead of just looking at how the gun laws are now and thinking about how they need to improve they should think about how you can’t control a person and what they do. I feel as if in Bruce’s …show more content…
First, Bruce uses tone to emphasize her thoughts. “Tone is a general character or attitude of a place, piece of writing, situation, etc.” as said by Dictionary.com. The depressing tone used made her article more memorable leaving the readers with a grim sense of feeling making it successful. Next, Bruce used alliteration to make her writing more interesting. As said by Dictionary.com, “Alliteration is the occurring of the same sound.” In the article Bruce used the terms “mass-murder” and “new normal”. These terms made the piece stronger because they were used right and were strong terms. Lastly, she used some fallacies such as ad hominem. “An ad hominem is directed against a person rather than the position they were maintaining” (Dictionary.com). Bruce used this fallacy while attacking Hillary Clinton for her tweets. Using this kind of a fallacy was successful because it got Bruce’s point across. Without using these devices and fallacies Bruce’s article would not have been strong

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Invincible Ignorance” by Thomas Sowell appeared in The Bismarck Tribune as apart of his syndicated column on December 24, 2012. Are gun control laws effective? Are guns really the problem? Or is it people that are the problem? Sowell answers each of these questions and states his opinion strong and clear. His tone, diction and background all play roles in his rhetorical strategy for his article. Gun control was a huge topic in the year 2012 and continues to be as we move into 2013.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American radio host and political commentator, Tammy Bruce, in her article, Why Gun Control Wont End Mass Murder, describes many statistics of gun violence. Bruce’s purpose is to make her readers aware of gun violence and the many factors contributing to it as well as how it is statistically unlikely that gun control will help. She adopts an aggressive tone in order to support those that agree with her. The main ideas expressed throughout this article are that politicians use shootings and gun violence for political gain and aren’t doing anything to stop it. She explains that gun control wont stop gun violence because of problems such as drugs leading to terrorists. Tammy Bruce in her article uses many statistics and viewpoints to support her claim against gun control.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Gun control has been a major issue in the past few years, and many journalists have written columns and essays in newspapers that are expressing their opinions on the subject. Nicholas Kristof, whom has been writing for newspapers for over ten years, took it upon himself to write Our Blind Spot about Guns for the New York Times in 2014. In his essay, Nicholas argued that if we set laws and regulations on guns the same way that we have done to cars, the amount of deaths caused by guns would decrease dramatically. He uses various statistics and discusses multiple ways that regulations and laws have decreased the amount of deaths caused by cars, and he relates it back to guns in his very well written essay. Nicholas seems to be addressing politicians in his essay, but his overall audience are those who are reading the newspaper.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Case Study

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently there are no laws or regulations in place that require private sales, gun show sales or internet sales to perform a background check during a firearm purchase unlike federally licensed firearm dealers. This leaves a loophole open for criminals to purchase firearms leading to more gun violence such as mass shooting and robberies. Gun violence can be reduced by requiring background checks for all guns sales, expanding background checks to include mental health status, and better reporting by law enforcement agencies to maintain accurate information in the database.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have read a good number of sources to know about the gun control. Afterwards, I planned how to organize my paper.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lunger, Norman L. “Gun Laws: What a Maze!.” Big Bang: The Loud Debate Over Gun Control. 54.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reduce Mass Shootings

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page

    One day, you could be one person who gets injured or get killed by a gun. We should always prevent accidents to happening by not allowing guns to be used by people. Guns could save you from getting killed by it could allow more humans to be killed in the future. Preventing guns can also reduce mass shootings to occur and gang members to use guns. Hunting is an unfair sport. While the hunters have powerful weapons, the animal can be easily harmed because it unarmed and helpless. From now on, we should try to reduce the amount of guns used in private homes.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial argument opposite to both viewpoints of gun control mentioned, is the negatives of guns and the need for gun control. In the article, “The Impact of Violence on Children,” Joy Osofsky elaborates that gun violence in communities are extremely detrimental in communities especially on children. Osofsky, a professor of public health in Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, uses masses of children psychology, scenarios and experiences to demonstrate the importance of gun control and to increase gun regulations. She focuses on children’s response to guns and violence, showing that the exposure of gun violence to children at their early ages not only increases their interest to use guns, but also the likelihood to use…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some problems with mass shootings, but with a little bit of changes those problems can be solved. There are many problems in the world today and mass shootings is just one of many. Mass shootings are deadly tragedies that happen to innocent people. Mass shootings are normally carried out with a person with a mental illness or some sort of disease.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    senior editor of USA today and Mother Jones stated that in 2002, there was a mass shooting that happened in Appalachian School of Law in Virginia. The killer was stopped by armed students, but those students were current and former law enforcement officers. Also, the killer was out of bullet when they subdued him. (More guns More mass shootings) This shows no matter how responsible the gun owners are, if they don’t know how to handle the life threatening situations, it becomes more dangerous because increasing the number of guns only creates more volatile and explosive situations. So I think having firearms at home is dangerous to kids but also useless when you really need it. Then supporters of the second amendments will say, gun laws won’t…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe gun control laws do not stop gun violence because of the killing population. If the gun control laws stop the violence the death crime wouldn’t be so high. Criminals don't seem to care about the laws. Criminals continue to carry guns looking for trouble.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abolish Mass Shootings

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the evidence found that gun control in fact could decline crime, some individuals refuse to believe so. One of those individuals is, Kit Daniels, a Texas journalist. Daniels in his article “10 reasons why gun control will not work” argues that putting a restriction on gun laws will not stop mass killings or gun related deaths nationwide, because individuals who are set out kill will find a way around these restrictions. Daniels then proceeds to argue that a limit on obtaining guns is a violation to the second amendment (Daniels). The argument that Daniels argues which is that gun control will not abolish mass shootings is accurate to an extend. As Daniels argues individuals who want are set out to kill others will proceed to do so.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time to bury the non-functional authoritarian idea of people control that has been negated by circumstances and technology.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays