As displayed on Graph 2 and Graph 6 and typed in Data Table 3 and 4, the moles of solute for ammonium chloride and the corrected moles of solute for urea were very close: .1627 moles of ammonium chloride and .1492 moles of urea. Even though the amount of moles was very similar, there is clearly a stark difference in the change in temperature when comparing Graph 2 and 6: When all of the moles of each solute were added to each beaker, the final change in temperature for ammonium chloride was nearly double that of the final change in temperature for urea. As shown in Data Table 3 and 4, the final change in temperature for ammonium chloride was 4.74 °C, and the final change in temperature for urea was 2.09 °C. To cause these results, ammonium chloride, which is a salt of a weak base, more than likely dissociated into ammonium ions and chlorine ions, resulting in twice as many more particles in solution than urea, which probably doesn’t dissociate much or at all, in the water/ice
As displayed on Graph 2 and Graph 6 and typed in Data Table 3 and 4, the moles of solute for ammonium chloride and the corrected moles of solute for urea were very close: .1627 moles of ammonium chloride and .1492 moles of urea. Even though the amount of moles was very similar, there is clearly a stark difference in the change in temperature when comparing Graph 2 and 6: When all of the moles of each solute were added to each beaker, the final change in temperature for ammonium chloride was nearly double that of the final change in temperature for urea. As shown in Data Table 3 and 4, the final change in temperature for ammonium chloride was 4.74 °C, and the final change in temperature for urea was 2.09 °C. To cause these results, ammonium chloride, which is a salt of a weak base, more than likely dissociated into ammonium ions and chlorine ions, resulting in twice as many more particles in solution than urea, which probably doesn’t dissociate much or at all, in the water/ice