Preview

Why Did Revolution Break Out in Russia in 1905?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4215 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Revolution Break Out in Russia in 1905?
Why did Revolution break out in Russia in 1905? In 1905, thousands of people gathered outside the Winter Palace, demanding change and immediate reform. Although their revolt was ultimately unsuccessful, it is important to wonder why many people were disgruntled with the Tsarist regime. It can be argued that 1905 revolution resulted in both long-term and crucial short term factors: the long-term factors which will be discussed are peasant land-hunger, the declining economy and the exploitation of Jews. For the first factor, I will begin by discussing the reign of Alexander II to Nicholas II; this will allow us to show the developments in time of peasant outrage. Secondly, the essay will discuss the reign of Alexander III who began terrible pogroms towards Jews and continued by Nicholas II, specifically the great pogroms of the early 1900’s. For the third area, the deteriorating economy created high unemployment and instability within the country. The key short term areas to discuss are: the disgruntlement of the working classes, Russo-Japanese war affected the social classes; it made people realise that Russia was possibly still a backward country because she lost the war; the trigger factor was Bloody Sunday which was the limit for many Russians because the protesters were shot dead by the Red Guard. It is also important to understand why each Tsar introduced certain policies, for a larger context. Thus, there are a variety of long-term and short-term factors to discuss. Let us firstly consider the long-term problem of peasant land hunger which led to the 1905 revolution. To understand this fully, it is crucial we look at the reign of Alexander II, Alexander III and Nicholas II which will allow us to analyse the changes and developments in time. The historian Maureen Perrie argues that the origins of the 1905 revolution can be traced back to the reign of Alexander II; she specifically points to the role of the peasantry arguing the involvement of the peasantry


Bibliography: Ascher, Abraham, The Revolution of 1905: a short history, (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2004). Bonnell, Victoria, Roots of Rebellion workers’ politics and organisation in St Petersburg and Moscow 1900-1914, (Los Angeles, California University Press, 1983). Flannery, Edward, The anguish of the Jews: twenty-three centuries of anti-Semitism, (New Jersey, Paulist Press, 1985). Galai, Shmuel, The Liberation Movement in Russia 1900-1905, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1973). Healy, Ann, The Russian Autocracy in Crisis, 1905-1907, (Hamden, Archon Books, 1976). Jones, Adrian, ‘Russian Intelligentsia responds to the war’ in Wolff David and Steinberg, John The Russo-Japanese War in global perspective: World War Zero, Volume 2, (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002). Perrie, Maureen, The agrarian policy of the Socialist Revolutionary Party: from its origins through to the revolution of 1905, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008). Sablinsky,Walter, The Road to Bloody Sunday, (New Jersey, Palgrave, 1976). Surh, Gerald, 1905 in St Petersburg: Labour Society and Revolution, (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1989). Weinberg, Robert, The Revolution of 1905 in Odessa: blood on the steps, (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007). Wheatcroft, Stephen, ‘Crises and the Condition of the Peasantry in Late Imperial Russia’ in Mann, Esther and Mixter, Timothy (ed), Peasant Economy, Culture and Politics of European Russia, (New jersey, Princeton University Press, 1986). Williams, Beryl, ‘1905: the View from the Provinces’ in Smele Jon and Haywood Anthony (ed), The Russian Revolution of 1905: centenary perspectives, (New York, Routledge, 2005). Yoshifuru, Tsuchiya, ‘Unsuccessful National Unity: The Russian Home Front in 1904’ in Wells David and Wilson, Sandra The Russo-Japanese War in Cultural Perspective, (Leiden, Hotei Publishing, 2007). ----------------------- [1] Maureen Perrie, The agrarian policy of the Socialist Revolutionary Party: from its origins through to the revolution of 1905, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 58. [2] Perrie, The agrarian policy of the Socialist Revolutionary Party: from its origins through to the revolution of 1905, p. 67. [3] Perrie, The agrarian policy of the Socialist Revolutionary Party: from its origins through to the revolution of 1905, p. 76. [4] Shmuel Galai, The Liberation Movement in Russia 1900-1905, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 23. [5] Stephen Wheatcroft, ‘Crises and the Condition of the Peasantry in Esther Mann and Timothy Mixter (ed), Peasant Economy, Culture and Politics of European Russia, (New jersey, Princeton University Press, 1986), p. 345. [6] Abraham Ascher, The Revolution of 1905: a short history, (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2004), p. 52. [7] Beryl Williams, ‘1905: the View from the Provinces’ in Jon Smele and Anthony Haywood (ed), The Russian Revolution of 1905: centenary perspectives, (New York, Routledge, 2005), p. 35. [8] Williams, ‘1905: the View from the Provinces’ in Smele and Haywood (ed), The Russian Revolution of 1905: centenary perspectives, p. 35. [9] Ascher, The Revolution of 1905: a short history, p. 13. [10] Ascher, The Revolution of 1905: a short history, p. 17. [11] Robert Weinberg, The Revolution of 1905 in Odessa: blood on the steps, (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 164. [12] Edward Flannery, The anguish of the Jews: twenty-three centuries of anti-Semitism, (New Jersey, Paulist Press, 1985), p. 191. [13] Flannery, The anguish of the Jews: twenty-three centuries of anti-Semitism, p. 193. [14] Weinberg, The Revolution of 1905 in Odessa: blood on the steps, p. 182. [15] Ann Healy, The Russian Autocracy in Crisis, 1905-1907, (Hamden, Archon Books, 1976), p. 10. [16] Victoria Bonnell, Roots of Rebellion workers’ politics and organisation in St Petersburg and Moscow 1900-1914, (Los Angeles, California University Press, 1983), p. 21. [17] Gerald Surh, 1905 in St Petersburg: Labour Society and Revolution, (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1989), p. 11. [18] Bonnell, Roots of Rebellion workers’ politics and organisation in St Petersburg and Moscow 1900-1914, p. 34. [19] Adrian Jones, ‘Russian Intelligentsia responds to the war’ in David Wells and Sandra Wilson (ed), The Russo-Japanese War in Cultural Perspective, (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), p. 134. [20] Jones, ‘Russian Intelligentsia responds to the war’ in Wells and Wilson (ed), The Russo-Japanese War in Cultural Perspective, p. 145. [21] Tsuchiya Yoshifuru, ‘Unsuccessful National Unity: The Russian Home Front in 1904’ in David Wolff and John Steinberg (ed), The Russo-Japanese War in global perspective: World War Zero, Volume 2 (Leiden, Hotei Publishing, 2007), p. 326. [22] Surh, 1905 in St Petersburg: Labour, Society and Revolution, p. 12. [23] Walter Sablinsky, The Road to Bloody Sunday, (New Jersey, Palgrave, 1976), p. 143. [24] Sablinksy, The Road to Bloody Sunday, p. 85.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in 1881-1905?”…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    o Trans-Siberian Railroad o Foreign investment o “exhaustion at the base” 1894-1917 nicholas ii 1898 founding of Marxist Russian social democratic labor party marxists who favored proletariat, working class 1900 international financial crisis 1902 founding of socialist revolutionary party anti marxist, and anti capitalist favored peasants and violence 1903 mensheviks and bolsheviks arose bolsheviks wanted revolution ASAP mensheviks were pro waiting 1903 massive wave of strikes 1904 russia goes to war with japan Russia failed and this caused privitization and additional hardship 1905 bloody Sunday: led to mass distress in country father gapon October manifesto: granted civil liberties to Russian people and the establishment of parliament 1906 first duma: lower chamber of Russian parliament 1906-1911 stolypin assassinated A. Stolypin believed that by abolishing the peasant commune, they would be more productive B. Kulaks: new peasant class, upper class peasants, had more money and were more intelligent C. Stop division of land; title of land goes to families o Redistribute land so peasants get plot…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The early twentieth century in Russia saw people from many different levels of society experience grievances due to the poor leadership and decision making of Nicholas II. Nicholas failed to see the problems his people were dealing with and was too caught up in keeping Russia under autocratic rule. The grievances the Russian people experienced ranged from political, social and economic. Each social class had different criticisms and issues with the Russian government but the dissatisfaction with the government was a shared feeling all over Russia. The social classes that experienced major grievances included the peasants, industrial workers and the nobility.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    unitisation of the left and right wing of the Duma and the apparent cooperation between the…

    • 896 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stretched from Europe to the Pacific Ocean and included people with diverse cultures and traditions.2 Russia was a land of disparity and contradiction by the turn of the 20th century. It was caught in between two worlds: the traditional world of the peasantry and the modern world of the westernized elite.3 As these two world coexisted, their values, culture, and way of life extremely differed. Regardless of the persistence of a rural society and economy, Russia became exposed to profound urban and industrial growth during the second half of the 19th century. 4Many peasants surfed…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The accuracy of this statement is absolute. It is apparent that the majority of citizens residing in Pre-Revolutionary Russia were not satisfied with the way in which their Autocratic government ran the country. There were numerous factors which contributed to the citizens discontent with the nation. Living conditions were poor, working conditions were even worse, being the first western nation to loose to Asia, the failure to promote freedom within the Duma as well as the Tsar’s complete and utter ignorance to the people were all causes of this unrest.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When discussing why public opinion of the tsar was so easily pliable in the lead up to revolution in 1917, we must acknowledge that Russia was evolving rapidly. As modern historians and public spectators, it is simple to map out how Russian society became a pressure cooker of discontent and anger. Mass industrialisation made living for a working, urban class almost unbearable, the class divide was still rigid, revolutionary ideas from the West offered a foundation to base claims for the removal of the autocratic system, and the pressures of World War 1 served to unite the people in one cause to end hardship. These factors stoked a population already vying for change and such an environment made revolution in Petrograd (St Petersburg) in the February of 1917 almost inevitable, foreshadowing the end of the…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The abolition of serfdom in 1861, under Alexander II, and the reforms which followed were a ‘watershed’, ‘a turning point’ in the history of Russia. After being soundly defeated in the Crimean War (1853-56), Russia was fully exposed to her backwardness in all fields- military, economic, social and administrative. The reforms under Alexander II, an aftermath of the war were undertaken to air the grievances of different sections of society. During the late 1860s and 70s, a more assertive public opinion was emerging with recurrent outbreaks of student protest and formation of a small but dynamic underground revolutionary movement, which pressurized the government for more changes.…

    • 3563 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays