Preview

Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1843 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917
Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.
In my opinion the …show more content…
Trotsky was the reason as to how the Bolsheviks gained so much power as he insisted on using ex-tsarist officers to train and control the red army. He used strict discipline in order to help the army and this greatly supported the Bolsheviks and helped them win the civil war. Trotsky also was the reason as to how the civil war was won, because not only did he recruit trained army officers- which was extremely difficult to do due considering most supported the whites- but also because he organized food and weaponry (8) and forced the red army to attack the Kronstadt sailors across melting ice, ruthlessly stooping the result and putting an end to the civil war. In other words, he won the civil war virtually single handed. This was one of the main reasons as to how the Bolsheviks consolidated their power and without the training of the army commanded by Trotsky, they wouldn’t have had the chance to be noticed. Furthermore, without Trotsky’s harsh commands and the declaration of “war is the instrument of policy” the civil war would’ve carried on, destroying the Bolshevik party and everything they had worked
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the Role of Individuals in Bringing About the Changing Influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945.
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate the Role of Individuals in Bringing About the Changing Influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945.

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    'Everyone Is a Product of Their Times'. How Accurate Is This Statement in Regards to Leon Trotsky?
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    'Everyone Is a Product of Their Times'. How Accurate Is This Statement in Regards to Leon Trotsky?

    Born into a world of change due Russian Industrial revolution, Trotsky was shaped by his historical context and early life. The Revolution took place in the late 19th century. Industrialization was occurring at a fast rate with export of grains and coal increasing, however the working class was still repressed. Trotsky was introduced to a place where change was prevalent, yet nothing had been done for the proletariat. This impacted on his views that became apparent in later life. Trotsky was introduced to Communism in 1897. Being an inexperienced political activist, he was caught and exiled to Siberia. Trotsky was aware of leading Marxist Russians residing in London, including Martov and Lenin, and he escaped to join them. Arriving in 1902, Trotsky established a strong relationship with Lenin, who appreciated his literary abilities. Lenin checked Trotsky’s writing, especially articles for the Communist newspaper ‘Iskra’. However, in the Party Congress of 1903, the Social democratic party split into the Lenin led Bolsheviks and Martov headed Mensheviks. Trotsky stood against Lenin, stating that his theories went against Marxist notion of freeing the working classes. Through the context of his times, and early life experiences, it can be discerned that events…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917 24 Essay
    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917 24 Essay

    had very smart and tactical aims and objectives and ideas of what was best for Russia.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power
    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    russian revoloution empathy task
    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages

    russian revoloution empathy task

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Far Did Russia's Failure To Win The War Of 1905
    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Far Did Russia's Failure To Win The War Of 1905

    The result, Trotsky told the tsar was ‘the general dissatisfaction of all classes with the government and tgeur open hostility towards it’. Trotsky’s depressing conclusion was that ‘it is impossible to maintain this form of government except by violence’.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Lenin crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917?
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent was Lenin crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917?

    On 24th October 1917 the Lenin and the Bolsheviks led a revolution in Russia. The Bolshevik Red Guards led a revolution against the Provisional Government by seizing control of stations, telephone exchanges, post offices, the national bank and the Winter Palace in Petrograd. Now Lenin set about creating the world’s first communist state. Although he was a strong influence, he was not solely responsible for the outbreak of revolution. There are other important causes of the Bolshevik seizure of power, such as the weakness of the Provisional government and Kerensky’s mistakes. Also other important factor was the actions of Trotsky and the timing and luck of the Bolsheviks. However, Lenin was, to a large extent, crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power because he presented his April thesis, which gave the people of Russia an awakening to the communist aim.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    He outsmarted his rivals (Ex. Trotsky) in order to win the power clashes and take control of the Communist Party of the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bolshevik Consolidation of Power
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bolshevik Consolidation of Power

    War Communism (WC) was of substantial importance to the Bolshevik consolidation of power. WC played a major role in the Bolshevik victory in the Civil War and thus allowed them to maintain power and control in Russia. However, from the Bolsheviks initial seizure of power in 1917 through to 1924, a number of other factors were of importance in enabling the Bolsheviks to consolidate this power. These factors included the Early Decrees, implemented Lenin, their victory in the civil war and the New Economic Policy (NEP).…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate The Significance Of Leon Trotsky
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate The Significance Of Leon Trotsky

    Leon Trotsky, born Lev Davidovich Bronstein was one of the most foremost figures in the Russian revolution and civil war. Trotsky holds great significance to Soviet Russia as he provided both drive and organisation and is attributed to saving the Bolshevik revolution of November 1917. Some debate however does exist among historians as to whether Trotsky was a practical idealist or simply a naïve revolutionary. Trotsky’s vast impact and contribution to Soviet Russia is however undisputed and undeniable.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why the Red Army won the Civil War
    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the Red Army won the Civil War

    My second point as to why the Red Army conquered in the Civil War is the military strength of the Red Army and the military weakness of the opponents. Trotsky was a key person in the military for the Red Army. He made sure that offices who had fought for the Tsar were a part of the Red Army which provided the Reds with more experienced leaders. To ensure their loyalty to the Red Army, Trotsky held hostage families of those who were conscripted to the Red Army and those who had originally fought in the Tsarist army. In…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did the Bolsheviks Succeed in 1917? Essay Example
    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Did the Bolsheviks Succeed in 1917? Essay Example

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    The fall of the Provisional government and the Bolshevik Revolution sparked many changes for Russia in 1917. It changed Russia for always. The economic system changed from a capitalist system to a socialist economy, peasants were granted the land that they already took in the February/March revolution and it ended the war and made peace in Russia. The lead up to the revolution can be traced back as far as March during the February/March revolution of 1917.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Social History
    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social History

    Social historians who intend to focus on understanding the root causes and motivations for the revolutions of 1917, look towards the actions and behaviour of normal, everyday people involved within the Revolution rather than the influence of great men and women, or the policies of a state. Social historians observe and comment on the fact that leading up to 1917, there was a widening and very apparent gap between the richest members of Russia society and the very poorest members. Rather than being typecast as the ignorant and stupid masses, many Russians from all different walks of life whether they were soldiers, peasants, factory workers, or homemakers developed their own consciousness and opinions as to what that the revolution meant for Russia, how they should function in a new society, how that society should be structured, and what it should look like. In contrast to what Bolshevik propaganda would have some of us believe, many Russians did not blindly follow or believe in demagogues like Trotsky or Lenin who were promising bread, circuses, and miracles for the suffering population. Instead, many developed their own opinions on what kind of regime should take power and represent Russia and what type of laws should govern the land. Due to the fact that the vast swarm of Russian society was what would be considered lower-class, the message of the Bolsheviks for a government and party to represent the lower-class was simply much more appealing than other parties at the time such as the liberals or the conservative factions in the government. Peace by the means of an end to the Russian involvement in the First World War, bread for the starving masses in the cities, and land to those who were disappointed by the lack of agricultural reform since the emancipation of 1861 were all promises that were much more appealing than the message of the provincial government. The…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Was Leon Trotsky More Important To The Russian Revolution
    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Was Leon Trotsky More Important To The Russian Revolution

    In fact, Trotski is quoted saying “We have not organised the revolution to kill”(Spartacus). However, there were too many groups trying to destroy the Bolsheviks. This forced Vladimir Lenin to create the “Extraordinary Commission for the Suppression of the Counter-Revolution” also known as the Cheka; A secret police force. While the creation of this group was Lenin’s idea, Trotsky was put in charge, and repeatedly eliminated numerous enemies of the revolution. This was Trotsky’s first step in winning the civil war. When the “Whites” attacked the Bolsheviks and started the Civil War, Lenin appointed Trotsky as the Commissar for War, and President of the Supreme War Council. Thus, Trotsky single handedly was responsible for the Bolsheviks victory in the Civil War after defeating all enemy threats with terror and fulfilling the head leadership roles he was appointed to. Trotsky was extremely valuable to the Bolsheviks due to the fact that without him, they would have lost the Civil War. Without Trotsky, there would have been no one suitable to fill his numerous positions in which he had to make hard decisions that conflicted with his personal morals and mastermind many of the Bolsheviks victories. In addition, the vicious, blunt leader rebuilt the Russian army with the help of the Red Guards and through a recruiting and training process which proved difficult due to the fact that most officers supported the “Whites”. Trotsky was single handedly responsible for increasing the amount of soldiers from 7,000 in March 1918 to 5 million in Sep 1920(Brown, 1990). Without the essential rassemblement of this army, Trotsky would have not had the fire power to order Red Guards to ruthlessly put down the revolt of the Kronstadt sailors in March of…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics