Preview

What Led to the Rise of Political Parties in the 1790's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Led to the Rise of Political Parties in the 1790's
There are a few different reasons for the rise of political parties in the 1790’s, but the main reason is people had different views. There were many disagreements on the way that things should be interpreted from the constitution. There were two different parties, the Federalist and the Democratic Republicans.
Despite their different views of the government and the economy, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two great leaders in United States history. Throughout their political lives, they never stopped debating and representing what they believed in. People disagreeing with the government and the government’s different views on issues led to the rise of political parties in the 1790's.
Thomas Jefferson spoke out in the early 90's with a strict interpretation of the Constitution and his views on the bank. It is clear that powers are delegated based on the Constitution and accepting those limits is the foundation of the United States. He believes the bank is not favored by the Constitution. Jefferson obviously had different opinions than Alexander Hamilton. In 1790, Jefferson wrote, “...Hamilton was not only a monarchist, but in support of a monarchy based upon corruption” (Document 1).
Alexander Hamilton, on the other hand, has a more loose interpretation of the Constitution. He basically believes that proof is needed that the government is sovereign because, he said, “the power which can create a supreme law of the land, in any case, it doubtless sovereign as such case”. He believes that all laws made in the United States under the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land. Hamilton also accepts the growing tension. “Mr. Jefferson is at the head of a faction, decidedly hostile to me and my administration...Mr. Jefferson displays his dislike of funding the debt...Jefferson and his supporters are unsound and dangerous...” (Document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He had organized the value of a strong central government in foreign relations. Hamilton had an eye on more efficient organizations. Jefferson said according to let.rug.nl “I am not a friend to a very energetic government.” At the time the United States needed both influences Hamilton and Jefferson needed to decide between themselves what was best. Hamilton had introduced his bill and jefferson strongly objected.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jefferson believed that the Constitution was a strict document, while Hamilton believed it was more forgiving and left open for interpretation by the citizens of the United States. So in Jefferson’s interpretation of the Constitution, what Hamilton was trying to do was not…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was the sculptor who chiseled the rough edges of America’s economy away. He was the essential part in the plan to solve the massive war debt after the revolution. As a strong federalist, he had views that he and his party shared and were deemed fit for the refinement of America’s economy. Thomas Jefferson was his eternal rival in terms of views. Along with James Madison, Jefferson was the polar opposite to Hamilton. The two past presidents seemed to be rigid with their views concerning political strategies the United States was taking in its early decades. These men before their presidencies were rock solid anti-federalist. However, Jefferson and Madison…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two Party System DBQ

    • 1036 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite the fact the founding fathers advised contrary to the establishment of political factions as the Constitution withstood the ratification process, a rift amongst men in President George Washington’s cabinet instituted the move toward the conception of political party. During the time period between 1791 and 1833, a two-party system had begun that demonstrated the philosophy of the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. Although these two political groups were unyielding in their original ideas and beliefs, both had to change a few of their initial standpoints on numerous topics as they dealt with the truth of the government.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They both stood for opposing political sides, Hamilton a solid federalist, while Jefferson was an anti-federalist, or republican. Their political differences helped shaped their separate images clearly throughout history. Hamilton believed that a strong central government was the key to the government’s success and had a loose interpretation of the constitution and thus concurred that civil liberties and other aspects of the constitution should at times, be restricted. Jefferson believed in a strict version of the constitution, he opposed of Hamilton’s creation of the national bank and believed it to be unconstitutional. As key additions to the government, they also had a different outlook on the people of the country. Jefferson maintained faith in the people, yet distrusted special privilege among them. Hamilton however, believed that the power should rest in the wealthy and educated and wished to raise voting qualifications. Economically, Hamilton wanted a solid balance of agriculture, trade, and manufacturing to nurture the country. Jefferson on the other hand, believed that agriculture alone should be the backbone of our economy. He believed that states alone should manage their economic growth without the government stepping in or helping, whereas Hamilton thought the opposite. He believed in the creation of the national bank and internal taxation, brought forth by the central government.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prolonging the life of the young country required contributions from both founding fathers. Despite an undying possibility of the federal government becoming far too powerful Hamilton’s ideas by themselves would of done far better than Jefferson’s. Hamilton’s want for industrial power and a much stronger central authority derived from his experiences during revolutionary wartime. Hamilton saw then, the extent the country would be able to function without a source of revenue and with very limited congressional power. Jefferson’s attempts to enact laws to allow states to maintain their former rights, and his support of agriculture in the U.S. created a successful balance as his ideas contradicted Hamilton’s. However if themselves had put Jefferson’s plans into action, an extremely weak government would have led to further great crises potentially leading to the destruction of the young nation.…

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The political parties formed after the ratification of the constitution at George Washington's detest, contributed none to the development of national unity there was a lack of unity during the period of 1790-1840. The political parties originally formed were the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. Their ideals for how government should be run were highly different and this led to no unification.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Their views on human nature, form of government, ideal economy, the Constitution, etc, were nowhere near similar. For instance, the two leaders’ viewpoint on the best form of government were distinct from each other. I think that Hamilton and Jefferson should have combined both of their perspectives together to create the best government they could. Both of them had good ideas on how it should be run or by who. However, one was strong and the other was a little weak. Hamilton’s view on the government to me is a cliche. When it comes to running a country or even a small business, the only people who are believed to run them the best are rich, intelligent men. If you think about it thoroughly, these men probably didn’t start out wealthy until they were given jobs and became greedy with the money they earned. I think men would have to be smart, but don’t have to be wealthy to run a government or business. Jefferson had a very unique view on government. I thought it was clever to have a government that isn’t so strict so the people could enjoy their freedom, while Hamilton wanted a strong government. The only thing that could go wrong with Jefferson’s government, is eventually people will start to take advantage of all the freedom they have, which could lead to chaos in the…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Founding Fathers ratified the Constitution, they realized that they had to deal with sixty-three million dollars debt that they owed to those who took part in the American Revolution. In order to pay back this debt Alexander Hamilton created a financial program. However, some Republicans such as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison thought that his plan was unconstitutional because one would need to use the necessary and proper clause which most people feared because it gave the government too much power. This, however, is not so Alexander Hamilton’s financial plan however was mostly constitutional because it allowed it to use the powers as well as responsibilities congress already had such as print its own form of currency, issue taxes, and ultimately pay off debts. Hamilton’s financial plan can be broken down to four parts the taxation, national bank, Hamilton’s reports, and the assumption plan all four were within his rights to do so.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton understood that a strong central government would be needed to keep the fledgling country alive. In order to keep a strong government that understood the problems at hand, it needed to be run by first class, educated men. Hamilton also makes a good point in saying that, though Jeffersonians thought the rich would corrupt the government in order to profit for themselves, the rich had nothing to gain as they were already at the top of the social ladder. Whiele Hamilton was a realist, Jefferson was a romantic. He lagged…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of things lead to the start of the two party system and they were highly influenced by Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. People that lived in different areas had different views about different issues because of this it lead to the two party system some people believed in one and the other people believed in another. People that owned land and grew crops tended to side with Jefferson or the Republicans and people that didn’t own land tended to side with Hamilton or the Federalists. Washington was strongly against the two party system because of the reason that the country might split.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson both viewed the Constitution differently and in many ways . While Alexander believed in a more loosely Constitution Jefferson believed in a strict Constitution. Hamilton believed in a strong central government, without a strong government how will we protect our country, we need power. Hamilton also thought that the wealthy, well born and educated people should rule. If you aren't educated or don’t have any knowledge about how the government works how will you know what is right for the citizens and country. Jefferson believed in a strict Constitution, he felt as if the national bank would not benefit the society but would hurt us, and that we should pay our debts right away, I do agree with that point because we wouldn’t have such a great debt at this moment. Jefferson believed in a strict Constitution, the government shouldn't over power the citizens, the citizens also need rules to follow the Constitution was written for a reason and for us to follow it. Jefferson was in favor and primarily speaking for the agriculture side of the government, he spoke mostly for the farmers because they didn’t have to rely on anyone, and Hamilton wanted to promote businesses and manufacturing.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jefferson vs. Hamilton

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Jefferson and Hamilton had two very different views on politics. Many clear thinking Americans could tell you at least some facts about Thomas Jefferson. Far fewer would likely have an idea of who Alexander Hamilton was and what he provided as a Founding Father. Yet his idea of an American government was just as important as that of Jefferson. Both Jefferson and Hamilton foresaw the new nation as a future power, and both had very different ways to get it there. Jefferson believed the nation’s strengths lay in its agricultural roots. He favored an agrarian nation with most powers reserved for the states. He was very opposed to a sturdy central authority and believed that the citizens were the final…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays