Jefferson Vs Hamilton Essay
When George Washington appointed both Hamilton and Jefferson to his cabinet, it was obvious that there would be controversy. These two men both had very different views, and both helped to create what we practice as today's government. Though both made good points, it was Hamilton who had the right idea for government. Even now, his ideas are perfect for how current government should be run. Hamilton understood that a strong central government would be needed to keep the fledgling country alive. In order to keep a strong government that understood the problems at hand, it needed to be run by first class, educated men. Hamilton also makes a good point in saying that, though Jeffersonians thought the rich would corrupt the government in order to profit for themselves, the rich had nothing to gain as they were already at the top of the social ladder. Whiele Hamilton was a realist, Jefferson was a romantic. He lagged
…show more content…
Not all of the kinks had been worked out of it yet, and it still needed some fine tuning. This is why Hamilton's loose constructionist ideas were better than the strict constructionist ideas of Jefferson. There obviously things in the Constitution that had been missed, or written confusingly. This is why a loose interpretation must have been taken of the Constitution at the time. Jefferson felt that it was already perfect, but it was not. The Constitution did not provide for a cabinet, political parties, or a bank, but all three of them have proven to be important parts of our country. The idea of a bank is a good example of how loose constructionist theory is important. We needed money in order to pay off the debt we had gotten from the war. If we had interpreted the Constitution as saying that a bank was unconstitutional just because it wasn't in the Constitution, we would have never been able to begin to make money back to pay off the
Not all of the kinks had been worked out of it yet, and it still needed some fine tuning. This is why Hamilton's loose constructionist ideas were better than the strict constructionist ideas of Jefferson. There obviously things in the Constitution that had been missed, or written confusingly. This is why a loose interpretation must have been taken of the Constitution at the time. Jefferson felt that it was already perfect, but it was not. The Constitution did not provide for a cabinet, political parties, or a bank, but all three of them have proven to be important parts of our country. The idea of a bank is a good example of how loose constructionist theory is important. We needed money in order to pay off the debt we had gotten from the war. If we had interpreted the Constitution as saying that a bank was unconstitutional just because it wasn't in the Constitution, we would have never been able to begin to make money back to pay off the