Preview

What Is The Sherman Act Monopolies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Sherman Act Monopolies
The United States Department of Justice pursues cases dealing with many aspects of the United States law system. One portion that they deal with is violations with the Antitrust laws. Anti trust laws were established to help the consumers and create competition, which create lower prices for products and services (Department of Justice, 2017 ). One of the three Antitrust Acts, the Sherman Act outlaws monopolies. There are currently two cases the Justice Department is working with that deal with monopolies, AMC’s acquisition of Carmike Cinemas and Foreign Exchange Dealers coming together to commit a Conspiracy. Both cases are interesting and have everything to do with anticompetitive behaviors leading to taking over a market.
In 2016 AMC moved

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mkc1 Study Guide

    • 8079 Words
    • 33 Pages

    When a group of retailers and wholesalers of a particular product decided to all raise prices together and they are accused of overpricing customers. Which federal law allowed the United States to investigate this anti- competitive method ?…

    • 8079 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MKC1 study guide

    • 2410 Words
    • 11 Pages

    accused of overcharging consumers. Which federal law would have allowed the United States government to investigate this unfair method of competition?…

    • 2410 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    18e Key Question Answer

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (Key Question) Describe the major provisions of the Sherman and Clayton acts. What government entities are responsible for enforcing those laws? Are firms permitted to initiate antitrust suits on their own against other firms?…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An additional issue is what does “active market participant” mean? The Court defined it as someone “who possess singularly strong private interests.” In this case, that appears to mean someone who works in the industry and has an interest in limiting competition in the industry. In summary, the Supreme Court did not make it clear what “controlled by active market participants” meant in the decision, and therefore that is likely to be a major point of contention going forward. As will be discussed later, the FTC guidance will likely serve as a major source of information on this…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Median Income Case Study

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States and many other countries have antitrust laws on the books to protect their consumers in their different markets. Having the abilities to both raise and lower prices are the reasons that oligopolies are so harmful.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federal Trade Commission’s merger test pursuant to the Clayton Act requires a showing of reasonable probability of a substantial lessening of competition. Therefor the mergers must not practice price discrimination, which is the sale of the same product to comparably situated buyers at different prices; tying and exclusive dealing contracts, which are the sale of products on condition that the buyer stop dealing with the seller's competitors; corporate mergers, the acquisition of competing companies by one company; and interlocking directorates, the members of which are common members on the boards of directors of competing companies. Most mergers have passed this test because there has been very little government enforcement of the law in the past decade, and because most mergers have been vertical mergers as opposed to horizontal mergers which are subject to government challenge. One major merger that was disapproved by the government is the United Air and US Air merger, the merger was called off by the companies because the government said that they would block it and sue because the government wanted to protect the people. The government believe that if the merger was allowed to proceed, millions of consumers would have little choice but to pay higher fares and accept lower quality air service.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Major League Baseball (“MLB”) is the only American Industry that is a self-regulating monopoly exempt from anti-trust law. In 1922, there was the U.S. Supreme Court Case of Federal Baseball Club v. National League and the judge unanimously decided that the Sherman Antitrust Act was not applicable to MLB and could therefore regulate as a monopoly. Furthermore, this decision was later reaffirmed in 1952 and 1972 in two different U.S. Supreme Court cases. This antitrust exemption has given increased monopolistic power to the MLB organization.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Patten, the Supreme Court found that “although carried on wholly within a State, if the necessary operation of a combination is to directly impede and burden the due course of interstate commerce, it is within the prohibition of the statute.”…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopolies In The 1800's

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Monopoly is the possession or control of the supply in a service. The government made monopolies illegal because they started to hurt the consumers by charging way too much for products. Also monopolies were so powerful they cause competitor companies to lose money and run out of business. Then they made monopoly illegal in the 1890’s was passed as the Sherman Antitrust Act. Work industries in the 1800’s were extremely dangerous, they didn’t have any equipment to keep them from getting hurt. They had children working also working there to get into cramped spots in machines and sometimes they would lost limbs and even their life. The work place was very unsanitary and busy. The Industrial Revolution was the transition to new manufacturing…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December of 2011 (Kanter, 2011, p. 3) the European antitrust authority started an investigation against Apple and five publishing companies for antitrust after receiving several complaints that they were price fixing on their e-books. The publishing companies were Penguin, HarperCollins, Hachette Livre, Simon & Schuster, and Macmillan. These companies were accused of going against the Antitrust Law called the Sherman Act. Apple and the publishing companies were using market power and collusion by working together to provide a raised price with their e-books for their customers who read these books on Apple’s devices. (Kanter, 2011, p. 3) Shortly after the European antitrust authority started their investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice started an investigation as well. (New Zealand Hearold, 2011)…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book The Monopolists is above all else about the hidden and untold truth behind the popular and legendary Monopoly. By giving earlier examples of the board game, The Monopolists piece by piece unveils the history of game through its many forms and varieties. It is well implied that the overall goal of the book is to give a complete history, like never told before, of how it came to be. Due to the ambiguous nature of the exact founding and development of the game, the author gives other historical versions that would influence the game we know today, and key players that made Monopoly what it is.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Anti-Trust Act

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was initiated as the, “Protect[ion of] trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies”. The he federal government was allowed to get involved with this issue was because it was an interstate matter. The Sherman Act prohibits anticompetitive conduct on all American soil. Later, in 1914, the Clayton Antitrust was passed. This act was passed because congress was dealing with matters that fell right outside the scope of the Sherman Antitrust Act . This act extended the jurisdiction of congress by adding some key elements. One, it is unlawful to “discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities, which commodities are sold for use… within the United States or any Territory…, where the effect of such discrimination may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce”. Two, “that discrimination in price between purchasers of commodities on account of differences in the grade, quality, or quantity of the commodity sold, or that makes only due allowance for difference in the cost of selling or transportation, or discrimination in price in the same or different communities made in good faith to meet competition”. The Clayton Act has over twenty sections and each section contains the words “Action done to prevent or lesson competition” numerously in various ways. America wants…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The DOJ filed suit on Aug. 13, arguing that the merger is anti-competitive and would hurt consumers. A trial is scheduled for Nov. 25 in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Competition laws often forbid private cartels. Identifying and breaking up cartels is an important part of the competition policy in most countries, although proving the existence of a cartel is rarely easy, as firms are usually not so careless as to put collusion agreements on paper.[2][3]…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: United States. U.S Department of Justice. Competition and Monopoly: Single-Firm Conduct Under Section 2 of The Sherman Act. 2008. Web.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays