Preview

18e Key Question Answer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
505 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
18e Key Question Answer
18-2 (Key Question) Describe the major provisions of the Sherman and Clayton acts. What government entities are responsible for enforcing those laws? Are firms permitted to initiate antitrust suits on their own against other firms? Sherman Act: Section 1 prohibits conspiracies to restrain trade; Section 2 outlaws monopolization. Clayton Act (as amended by Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950): Section 2 outlaws price discrimination; Section 3 forbids tying contracts; Section 7 prohibits mergers which substantially lessen competition; Section 8 prohibits interlocking directorates. The acts are enforced by the Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission, and state attorneys general. Private firms can bring suit against other firms under these laws.
18-5 (Key Question) How would you expect antitrust authorities to react to (a) a proposed merger of Ford and General Motors; (b) evidence of secret meetings by contractors to rig bids for highway construction projects; (c) a proposed merger of a large shoe manufacturer and a chain of retail shoe stores; (d) a proposed merger of a small life insurance company and a regional candy manufacturer; and (e) an automobile rental firm that charges higher rates for last-minute rentals than for rentals reserved weeks in advance. (a) They would block this horizontal merger (violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act). (b) They would charge these firms with price fixing (violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act). (c) They would allow this vertical merger, unless both firms had very large market shares and the resultant merger substantially lessens competition. (d) They would allow this conglomerate merger. (e) They would not interfere with this price discrimination.
18-10 (Key Question) What types of industries, if any, should be subjected to industrial regulation? What specific problems does industrial regulation entail? Industries composed of firms with natural monopolies conditions are most likely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Clayton Antitrust Act, It was passed in 1914, proscribes certain additional activities that had been discovered to fall outside the scope of the Sherman Antitrust Act. For example, the Clayton Act added certain practices to the list of impermissible activities: a. Price discrimination between different purchasers, if such discrimination tends to create a monopoly b. Exclusive dealing agreements c. Tying arrangements d. Mergers and acquisitions that substantially reduce market competition. EUROPEN UNION COMPETITON LAW: Article 82 of the EU competiton law also deals with the aspects of abuse of dominant position and predatory pricing.it states that “any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What are the differences among horizontal, vertical, and conglomerate mergers? What does the U.S. government hope to achieve through the use of its antitrust policy? How do the resolutions of the IBM®, ATT®, and Microsoft® antitrust cases differ? How does international competition affect domestic antirust policy?…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Median Income Case Study

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Why do the United States, and many other counties, have antitrust laws on the books? What's so harmful about oligopoly that warrants an entire body of law?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    finance manamgement

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Industry A is dominated by 10 large firms each with sales of approximately $500 million per year. A proposal to merge two of these firms was approved by the Justice Department as not violating the antitrust laws. Industry B is locally defined and much smaller. It is dominated by three small firms, each selling about $50 million per year. A merger between two of these companies was prohibited under the antitrust laws. Explain the logic under which the merger of two $500 million giants can be allowed while the relatively insignificant…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bmgt Quiz

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Which type of merger is likely to receive the closest examination by the Federal Trade Commission?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antitrust act hasn’t changed since it has been created, however the advancement of technology has made it difficult to establish which company would fall under the antitrust act. Older industries are easier to deal with because they are most likely to have a line of cases. Railroads industries for example, have been around for a long time now, which means there has been judges deciding things about it for more than a century. The problem are the technology companies, those are very contemporary making it more difficult for economists and lawyers to decide what is going against the antitrust laws and what isn’t. Furthermore, the advancement of technology has drastically increase deals between different countries. Considering this, before a deal gets approved, it has go through all the antitrust acts from all the countries involved in the deal. A very challenging and long lasting process. Antitrust acts have been around for more than a century, however it has been going through some changes to keep up with the advancements of…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EGT1 Task3

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Industrial Regulation is a type of regulation where the government concerns itself with public services such as public utilities and how much the consumers are charged by companies for the services provided. Industrial regulation is very important and was created to serve in the public's interest. Industrial regulation exists to moderate public services and govern control over prices for those services. “Industrial regulation comes from the theory of regulation of public interest which states that a natural monopoly must be regulated in order to prevent it from becoming a regular monopoly that charges monopoly prices, which harms society and consumers”(William D. Cohan, March 2011).…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sherman Act of 1890 states that trade restraints and monopolies are illegal. The Clayton Act of 1914 was put into place to further outline the illegal activities stated in the Sherman Act, and to outlaw ways that companies may try to develop monopolies. It was later amended by the Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950, which kept a company from merging with it’s competitor to acquire their stock. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 created the Federal Trade Commission, which has 5 members and works with the Department of Justice to regulate the antitrust laws. The Wheeler-Lea Act of 1938 was created as an amendment to the Federal Trade Commission Act. It made the FTC independent from the Department of Justice and also made unfair and deceptive sales illegal.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics Study Guide

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Regressive taxes hit the poor harder; progressive taxes very with a persons ability to pay.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the words of one critic, Isabel Paterson, "As freak law, the antitrust laws stand alone. Nobody knows what it is they forbid." In 1914 Congress legislate the Clayton Act, which forbidden particular trade actions if they significantly reduced competition. Simultaneously Congress initiated the FTC (Federal Trade Commission), who’s judicial and business specialists could pressure business to agree to "consent decrees", which gives a substitute instrument to guard antitrust.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pepsi and Quaker Merger

    • 7234 Words
    • 29 Pages

    This case talks about the latest trend of mergers and acquisitions and the ensuing fallout. The concern here is about the $14 billion merger of PepsiCo and Quaker Oats. After a long delay with regards to granting permission for this merger, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finally gave the go ahead after it realized that there was a split in the opinion of its members. 50 percent of the members voted in favor and the rest against the decision for the merger. This committee was set up to investigate the fairness of the deal with respect to the marketing principles commonly followed. Due to the split in decision, the entire investigation was called off, allowing the deal to proceed.…

    • 7234 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss the antitrust law, specifically the Sherman Act of 1870. A claim was filed against the NCAA by the Governor of Pennsylvania for reasons that violate this act. It will also discuss monopolies and oligopolies, given an example of how they can be good and bad for the economy.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective enforcement of the antitrust laws in order to eliminate restrictions on competition is the prime objective for every competition authority. Our focus is continuously on the most serious violations, such as horizontal agreements and concerted practices between competitors. The harm done to consumers and society of such activities is undisputable which need to be curbed.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although some economists and businessmen believe that the economy should be allowed to move freely based on the laws of supply and demand without government intervention, government involvement is necessary to ensure a competitive market and help prevent market failure. Ever since the Clayton Anti-trust Act was passed in 1890, government has regulated and broken apart monopolistic businesses. Since businesses are constantly moving towards a monopoly or oligopoly, government regulators must be increasingly vigilant in regulating monopolistic businesses to prevent a non-competitive market. If the government did not regulate businesses to prevent monopolies, then those corporations would become too politically powerful, decrease total output, and increase their prices. An example of the harmful effects a monopoly can have on politics is when a monopolistic company threatens to raise the price of a good or service that is important to the government in order to bring about a desirable result. Another reason government must stop monopolistic companies is because they artificially raise their…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anti-Trust Law

    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Americans have long loved free market system and the competition that it fosters. Competition among businesses has been regulated by anti-trust acts recently; however they help to maintain a fair and equitable system where the small business is able to compete with the big business. The anti-trust laws enable the consumer to purchase a quality product at an affordable price due to the competitive market that it sets in place between the businesses. Anti-trust laws are needed to continually handle the companies that would get out of control if not for regulations and rules. This paper will discuss the impact of the anti-trust laws that govern competitive business and how they protect the consumer and business from monopolies,…

    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays