Preview

What Is The Relationship Between Edmund Burke And The American Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
620 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Relationship Between Edmund Burke And The American Revolution
Edmund Burke Throughout history philosophers have attempted to explain the ins and outs of human society. These explanations have helped shape our perception of the world and the society we live in. One such philosopher is Edmund Burke, the father of modern conservatism. Considering Burke's stance on the American Revolution, it is quite surprising that he strongly opposed the French Revolution. In his most well known work, Reflections on the revolution in France, Burke argued that the revolution went against the rights of all the people involved and against the conventions that held their society together. Burke believed that living in a society, people have an equal opportunity to do anything for their self preservation and happiness as long as it does not interfere with that of others, and ‘‘in this partnership all men have equal rights, but not to equal things''. He also believed, however, that people have no right to that which can hurt them or is beyond reason. This is how he felt about the French revolution because he believed that it wouldn't lead to peace or democracy but to self destruction and anarchy. …show more content…
They need to adopt a lifestyle of moderation, because releasing these passions/desires would have a catastrophic effect on society. Therefore men need an outside power to judge their actions in a fair and balanced way as possible by that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Edmund Burke was a British statesman, parliamentary orator, and political thinker who played a significant role in all the major political issues of his time. Writing about a year after the French revolutionaries attacked Bastille, the "Reflections on the Revolution in France" by Burke was widely known for its attack on the principles that motivated one of the most remarkable events in western history. He became an important influence on classical conservatism since its creation in the year 1789. He was a firm believer of conservatism, even became an important influence on classical conservatism since its creation, and used this to support his claims in his critical analysis of the French Revolution.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burke’s protest of the revolution does not come from his estimates of its “extremist nature”, because he does not appreciate the extremities that are involved. He said that he was “incapable” of being in touch with those “who profess principles of extremities and who, under the name of religion, each little else than wild and dangerous politics.” That being said from what I have read about Burke, was that he was a religious man who believed that a man’s right was not an abstract principle, meaning that it was always development and it was not part of the first set of knowledgeable principles. He did not appreciate the extremist nature because he did not believe that there are rights and reasons to justify violence.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Reflections of the Revolution in France, Edmund Burke intellectually attacks the French for the occurrences that took place in their country during the late 1700s. Burke was strongly opposed to immense political reform. In this book, he voices his belief that it is counteractive to try new types of government because it can lead to the loss of the progress achieved by the past generations. Thus, he argues that all men are subject to a generational contract that embodies beings from the past, present and the future. This is where I begin to have a problem with Burke’s argument because, as stated in Paine’s book The Rights of Man, old forms of government cannot keep up with new elements that come about with changing times; thus, civilians…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution was a revolt against the taxation that Britain imposed upon the colonist and how the stamp act and the Townsend Act which increase the tax burden on the colonist, and they revolted. Rousseau spoke of direct democracy which sounded like a good idea to the colonist and Voltaire talked of being able to think freely and self-governing. Locke spoke of the rights of citizens and the power of government not ruling and depriving their colonist. Montesquieu spoke of separation of power.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What cause Burke to enumerate in his speech is to explain the “fierce spirit of liberty” in the colonies. This was due because of separation, not conciliation. His beliefs were that it was achievable to form a legislation that would put an end of the mistrust of the American colonist and make peace between the colonies and Britain. America was treated unfairly by the Britain’s government having denied it of its self-government, the right to conduct trade, to have the right to just taxation and representatives. He cared deeply about liberty, and he understood this and the likelihood for violence that it implies. He notes that he is not looking for anything other than simple peace, and that he is truly speaking from his heart and his intentions are good and genuine.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution was very attention-grabbing to me. The American patriots and the British chose to fight for land. They really wanted to rule the New World! I couldn’t believe that the Americans was having trouble fighting that war. When Thomas Paine wrote the American Crisis book it perhaps enlightened the Americans. Barnet Schechter said “This was really the low point for the Americans, Washington’s reputation was at stake. So it was really doing or die”. I feel that it gives Washington the feeling that he had to take control and find a means to win the combat. To me when he decided to go back to New York in the blizzard I said to myself this man foolish. Outside was too cold to fight a war or even stand. Bruce Chadwick…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the Enlightenment, many western political and economic philosophers attempted to describe the transition of mankind towards modernity. Specifically, Edmund Burke (1729-1797) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) were both heavily influenced by the American Revolution (1775-1783) and French Revolution (1789-1799), which compelled each to write about the existence of inequalities in society and transformations that aim to address these inequalities. Burke and Rousseau differed in their interpretations of why inequalities exist within society and had diverging views on radical transformation within society. These differences stem from their conflicting ideology pertaining to the role of the government, private property, liberty and notions of sovereignty. It is imperative to discuss each philosopher’s competing ideological framework of inequality and analyze each philosopher’s assessment regarding the desirability of radical transformation.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He also thinks citizens should have the right to revolt and government should always give and protect our rights. However, the Enlightenment thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau, feels we protect our own rights by working together. In class we discussed how his belief is similar to the phrase: If we all have superpowers the no one has superpowers. We considered this phrase because if everyone were to have superpowers, then we wouldn't wish to have them anymore since everyone has them. Rousseau also stated we must use reason to give the individual rights of life, liberty, and property. Locke shows his views on liberty by inferring one should have the ability to choose who governs them, as well as having their freedom of religion protected. Rousseau expresses his conception toward liberty by explaining whatever the majority of the people want should become law and rules should be strictly enforced if the people are in…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American Revolution was a major change in our history. Many things have happened to show this major change in our history such as, The Boston Massacre, The Tax Act, Boston Tea Part, and The Battle at Saratoga. These are just some of the things that happened during the American Revolution. The American Revolution was mostly a radical change because of the extreme changes in political, social, and economical areas.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the year of 1776, the United States became an independent country. At that moment, the great men who fought for its independence began to create the government and shape American politics. In Richard Hofstadter's The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It, he identifies twelve of the most influential men and the political traditions they created, including the Founding Fathers who started it all. Additionally, Hofstadter informs the reader of other significant government officials including Andrew Jackson and his democracy, the progressive, trustbuster Theodore Roosevelt, and ending with Franklin D. Roosevelt and his programs of the New Deal. Richard Hofstadter's ideas are brilliantly elucidated with his stunning choice of words and information. He begins the background with none other than the original American politicians - the Founding Fathers.…

    • 7032 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Burke spoke to the origin of human rights, the slippery slope human rights creates, and the changing of government. Burke does not believe in rights endowed by a creator. However, he does agree with Stanton that natural law does exist. It is disagreed upon, on how it can be interpreted and applied to the human rights question. Stanton uses the concept of natural law as another justification of human rights, while Burke believes that rights cannot be derived from it (Lauren, Paul Gordon. 1998. P.25). Burke stated that public affirmation of human rights would lead to political and societal upheaval. The equality being promised through human rights is false, and can never…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The French Revolution and the American Revolution, had many similarities and differences. The major similarity they both shared were that the Revolution for both occurred in instances of the civilians rebelling against their government. Which then the rebellion led to violence amongst the government and the people. The French Revolution and the American Revolution were both made up of ordinary citizens taking up arms and attacking their governments for their rights, and freedom. They both occurred in the later eighteenth century.They were different mostly because of their situation before the wars, the French was under monarchy as the Americans were not. The French had to fight off a ruler, to earn their freedom, and the freedom of their country.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two men, both fighting for the same cause during the American Revolution took different sides in the French Revolution because of their political views. Thomas Paine took the side of the French, opposing his own country, because he believed in a system where people can govern themselves. Edmund Burke took the side of the English because he was supporting his country and believed in a system where there needs to be a higher power to keep people in their place. Thomas Paine was a radical in the way he thought and believed in a total reform of the way people were living at that time. Burke was a Conservative and believed that things were fine just the way they were. Paine also believed in Thomas Jefferson’s statement all men are born equal and people should be able to make something of themselves. Burke believed that there should be a strict class system in which people could not move between one another. Although these men have two completely different political views, they both have positions that are well respected by society today.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His ideas explain the human tendencies behind many of the ideological beliefs that Burke and other conservatives take. In fact, many of Burke’s ideas can only stem from the conservative disposition that Oakeshott outlines in this essay. For instance, through his expression that enjoyment includes the acceptance that the current moment was given to us by the past, and specifically by past society’s actions and institutions, Oakeshott makes a direct explanation of Burke’s social contact which puts the people of the present in a contract with the past and the future. The third section of Oakeshott, where he applies the conservative disposition to government, is in direct concordance with Burke’s and the general conservative’s idea of practically as the soil in which policy ideas flourish or die, i.e. historical traditions must serve as the anchor for political activity. This fact supports Oakeshott’s end argument that an awareness of the world, which happens as the result of a conservative disposition, is a necessary for someone to work in politics, as it anchors them as they make new policies. As Oakeshott also grew up during the era of welfarism and the growth of the welfare state, his essay supports the stark transition from the older styles of conservatism, especially De Maistre, which often supported aristocracy and established class…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Traditional conservatives place an emphasis on tradition as they believe, according to Edmund Burke that traditional customs and practices in society is 'God given'. Burke thus believed that society should was shaped by the 'law of the Creator', or what he called the 'natural law'. If human beings tamper the world they are challenging the will of God. Burke further described tradition as a partnership between 'those who are living, those who are dead and those who are to be born'. Tradition is also revered as it could be argued to proven to work as it has been 'tested by time', and therefore be preserved for the benefit of the living and for generations to come. Tradition reflects a Darwinian belief that those institutions and customs that have survived have only done so because they have worked and been found to be of value. They have been endorsed by a process of 'natural selection' and demonstrated their fitness to survive. Conservatives also respect tradition because it generates, for both society and the individual, a sense of identity. Established customs and practices are ones that individuals can recognize; they are familiar and reassuring. Tradition also generates social cohesion by linking people from the past and providing them with a collective sense of who they are. Change, is unknown and therefore it creates uncertainty and insecurity, and so endangers our happiness. Tradition, therefore, consists of rather more than political institutions that have stood the test of time.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays