Preview

Thomas Paine vs. Edmund Burke

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
855 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Paine vs. Edmund Burke
Two men, both fighting for the same cause during the American Revolution took different sides in the French Revolution because of their political views. Thomas Paine took the side of the French, opposing his own country, because he believed in a system where people can govern themselves. Edmund Burke took the side of the English because he was supporting his country and believed in a system where there needs to be a higher power to keep people in their place. Thomas Paine was a radical in the way he thought and believed in a total reform of the way people were living at that time. Burke was a Conservative and believed that things were fine just the way they were. Paine also believed in Thomas Jefferson’s statement all men are born equal and people should be able to make something of themselves. Burke believed that there should be a strict class system in which people could not move between one another. Although these men have two completely different political views, they both have positions that are well respected by society today. The first contrasting point between Paine and Burke’s political views is that Paine believed in a system where people can govern themselves and Burke believed that there still needed to be a higher power to tell people what to do. Paine thought that people should be able to tax themselves, therefore saying that people can fend for themselves. He did not think that all the power should rest in a center government. He thought maybe there could be a central government so things did not get out of hand, but it would not have much executive power. His encounters with the indigenous peoples of the Americas made a deep impression. The ability of the Iroquois to live in harmony with nature while achieving a democratic decision making process, helped him refine his thinking on how to organize society. On the other hand, Burke still believed in a monarchy system. He thought that there needed to be a king and a queen to rule over the nation. All

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Edmund Burke was a British statesman, parliamentary orator, and political thinker who played a significant role in all the major political issues of his time. Writing about a year after the French revolutionaries attacked Bastille, the "Reflections on the Revolution in France" by Burke was widely known for its attack on the principles that motivated one of the most remarkable events in western history. He became an important influence on classical conservatism since its creation in the year 1789. He was a firm believer of conservatism, even became an important influence on classical conservatism since its creation, and used this to support his claims in his critical analysis of the French Revolution.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason Paine stated for breaking ties with England is that it would help us avoid war with Europe because every time a war commences among Britain and whichever nation, the trade of American gets crumbled. Another reason is that Thomas Paine believed that while the government remained in the custody of the king, it would result in ruining the legislation of Britain. Paine also thought that having a king was sinful and unnatural. The last reason Paine thought that people should break free from Britain was because Britain would not protect America. Britain would basically let America get destroyed instead of…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry two well known rebel scums in their time, both realized a problem with Britain's current rule over America. After the two were fed up with the constant bashing of the British rule, they decided to write speeches giving their point of view. Patrick Henry’s, “Liberty or Death”, and Thomas Paine's, “the Crisis”, both do a magnificent job of demonstrating the oppression Britain had on America through humanity.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rights of Man is a collection of several articles which insights radical political revolution when a country’s current government is not maintaining and protecting the rights of its society. The book was widely accepted, reprinted and distributed in support of the French revolution and was read aloud in coffee houses and inns in the newfound ‘coffee house culture’. The document states that ‘every age and generation must be as free to act for itself, in all cases, as the ages and generations which preceded it’. This extract therefore opposes the idea that government is hereditary and current society should be entitled to choose their own laws which to be governed by. It was due to ideas such as these that Paine was eventually tried in…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It all started with a propagandist writing one pamphlet that was made by an anonymous English man. This person didn’t just make the revolutionists more boastful and proud of themselves and made the bestseller of the 18th century, but he ignited them to split away from England and persuaded them to go on the road to freedom. This man was Thomas Paine, one of the most famous writers and founding fathers of this country. Thomas Paine was a founding father who has contributed to the war by writing two pamphlets, Common Sense and The American Crisis, writing articles, and donating money. Even thought he is an English Quaker, he still believes in the cause. As Thomas Paine writes in Common Sense, “In England…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The demise of the Whigs was rather a consequence of the ideological homogeneity that had escaped them. Portland was driven away from Fox because their priorities did not allow common ground. He was to become aligned with Pitt because theirs did. Whilst Fox valued liberty above all else, Portland did not; he was anxious for the maintenance of social order. The French Revolution made this impossible to go on ignored for, in the face of the tumult over events in France, the new political scene, as set by Burke’s Reflections, was rapidly drawn into an ordered spectrum of radical and conservative thought.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Paine figured that America would gain many advantages if they were to seek independence that would help the country in the long run. He starts off in why Britain is not right for America anymore in the way of its government. He stated the Britain’s government was too complex for the colonies and that it contradicted itself with different policies. Paine also said that the government had too much power and that nothing was put in place to balance that power out. The colonies would be better off without the rule of the British monarchy and that they have evolved into a relatively independent nation. They no longer had only reason to give their allegiances to Britain and that the colonies were only taken care of by the government to…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paine claims that the only end for a government or any kind of political association is to serve the people. This service that the government gives the people is national security, and protection of liberty, property and against any oppression. According to Paine, these are the only roles that a government should take. I thought that this particular point by Paine was especially interesting given today's modern thought by some that we need a bigger government that has more control of things. When the founding fathers formed this country, they intentionally made the government as small as possible so as not to infringe on human…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution instigated further inconsistencies between the two factions. Many American’s welcomed the French Revolution because it resolved feudalism and established a constitutional monarchy. However, as the French Republic rose and initiated the “Reign of Terror”, many Federalist condemned the new French government beliefs. While the Republicans proclaimed “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!” In relation to the British, the relationship was extremely important regarding mercantilism, so the Federalists commenced to pro-Britain foreign policies.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s and Alexander Hamilton’s views and opinions endured most saliently in disagreement. Jefferson, along with the Republican Party viewed the “American revolution as a liberation movement … a break from not just from English domination but also from the historic corruptions of European monarchy and aristocracy” (Ellis 13-14). This philosophy is known as the “Jeffersonian interpretation” (Ellis 14). Whereas Hamilton, a man of the Federalist belief, subscribed more to the belief that “the core revolutionary principle … is individual liberty” (Ellis 14) and…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry, Paine, Freedom

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lastly we can see by reading those speeches that Henry and Paine wrote their works at different times. Henry using war while Pain is using the history of their ancestors, but both reached their single goal that is freedom.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The two essays, "Civil Disobedience," by Henry David Thoreau, and "Letter From a Birmingham Jail," by Martin Luther King, Jr., effectively illustrate the authors' opinions of justice. Each author has his main point; Thoreau, in dealing with justice as it relates to government, asks for "not at once no government, but at once a better government. King contends that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Both essays offer a complete argument for justice, but, given the conditions, King's essay remains more effective, in that its persuasive techniques have more practical application. Both essays extensively implement both emotional and ethical appeal to give their respective ideas validity.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    histroy

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paine presented multiple arguments in his pamphlet, Common Sense. One of his arguments that stood out to me the most is that regarding the monarchy and hereditary succession. Paine describes how nobody chooses to live poorly and cannot choose the status of their descendants and the importance and idea of equality. He describes the difference between Kinds and subjects as being unnecessary and unethical. Everyone is equal at creation. People of the colonies could relate to this on a religious aspect as well, because the Bible supports his statements. Paine supported the beliefs of freedom of property to all men and freedom on religion. Paine also discussed America and the relationship with Great-Britain. Paine stated that America had become dependent on Great-Brittan and that success and happiness should not be reliant on another country. He wrote that Great-Britain had nobody’s interest in mind but their own. Paine also pointed out the unnecessary quarrels with other countries such as France and Spain, due to the fact that we were involved with Great-Britain and pictured them as the parent country. He introduced the idea of having each colony be independent and have representatives chosen by the people.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written in 1776 by Anonymous, Paine tried to explain to the Americans why they should come together in unity and revolt against the tyrannical power of Great Britain. Paine uses an argumentative style of writing in his work. He tries to establish a point by providing sufficient evidence to support it. Paine goes further in supporting his argument by explaining both sides of the argument. In other words, he not only tries to appeal to those Americans that want independence, but also with those that want to reconcile with Great Britain. "I have heard it asserted by some, that as America has flourished under her former connection with Great Britain, the same connection is necessary towards her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing can be more fallacious than this kind of argument. We may as well assert that because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat...."(Baym 694). Paine states that there are some Americans' that feel that America has flourished as a country, and in order to continue to flourish we (referring to the Americans) must not revolt but we have to continue to have Britain's control over us. However since we have flourished because of their control, it doesn't mean that we can't flourish on our own. One can see that Paine is attempting to address any counterarguments that may be posed against the point he is trying to establish. By addressing these counterarguments he can try to show those who want to reconcile with Great Britain that his point of view is right.…

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He claimed that the country was one peacefully cohesive body. One major difference that breaks Thomas Paine’s claim is the fact that the “United” States of America are not really united together anymore. Americans have created distinct divisions between themselves causing frequent turmoil and crises. Aside from the racial and religious divisions that Americans created, there are several other divisions that are causing conflict. For instance, the separate political parties are most definitely contributing to America’s de-unification (Thomas). The heated controversy concerning the Democratic Party and the opposing Republican Party not only separate public officials making politics more challenging, but they also divide the regular citizen population based on how they choose which side they favor (Thomas). Favoring different political parties leads to many problems in the long run. Another cause for division is different views of political power. Some states, such as Texas have even threatened to secede from the union because of conflicting views on political issues, such as the level of power of the state government has versus the federal government (Thomas). The opposing views on politics and power have caused obvious separation in American…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays