Preview

Founding Brothers Dichotomy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Founding Brothers Dichotomy
The modern American public often views the Founding Fathers of the United States as level-headed, well-intentioned, diplomatic, successful statesmen. Upon further investigation and analysis, a clear discordance in the men’s visions of the American Spirit shows its face. Some founders strived for a strong centralized federal government while others desired a union of essentially independent states. This dichotomy reveals the schism of understanding amongst the “Founding Brothers” as illuminated in the historical analysis by Joseph Ellis. Thomas Jefferson’s and Alexander Hamilton’s views and opinions endured most saliently in disagreement. Jefferson, along with the Republican Party viewed the “American revolution as a liberation movement … a break from not just from English domination but also from the historic corruptions of European monarchy and aristocracy” (Ellis 13-14). This philosophy is known as the “Jeffersonian interpretation” (Ellis 14). Whereas Hamilton, a man of the Federalist belief, subscribed more to the belief that “the core revolutionary principle … is individual liberty” (Ellis 14) and …show more content…
Jefferson—from Virginia, one of the most slavery-supporting states—owned many slaves and did not believe in the “incorporation” of African Americans into an equal society (Ellis). Even Hamilton, a “staunch antislavery advocate,” did not appreciate the time spent addressing and debating the inhumanity of slavery, for he felt it “stymied his highest priority, which was approval of his financial plan” (Ellis 113). Though both men believed in different levels of equality, neither of them supported the action, resulting in the Silence elucidated in Founding Brothers. Their view of the revolutionary spirit was split on this time spent in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book consists of three parts and covers many events and issues of the young American Republic. It is not set of biographies but detailed review, critique and analyses of several seminal occurrences, mainly duel between Alexander Hamilton and the Governor of New York, Burr (part 1).…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton (2004), Ron Chernow tackles the errand of depicting America's most questionable Founding Father. The book gives an expansive perspective of the scene of early America, with unique accentuation on Hamilton's accomplishments and his relationship to certain Founders.Before understanding this book, my contemplations concurred with the prevalent picture of Hamilton as a splendid however tyrannical man who was as often as possible required in outrages or in clashes with different Founders. I heard that he pushed government, protectionism, mercantilism, a solid government, and a national bank. I additionally realized that he had something to do with the Constitution and thought of a portion of The Federalist Papers. I realized…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book Founding Brothers was written in a way that anyone could read. Even people who are unfamiliar with the American Revolution would feel comfortable reading this book and have a good understanding of what happened during that time period. The author, Joseph Ellis, explains throughout the book the conflicting interpretations of the meaning of the American Revolution as well as the influence it had on the early history of the United States of America.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton's Vision

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jefferson’s views differed substantially from Hamilton’s. As Hamilton went on his quest for economic development and superiority of the U.S, Jefferson always dreamed of a society ran by independent yeoman farm families. Jefferson attracted members of the south as southern society relied heavily on farming as opposed to the industrial north. Jefferson’s perspective may differ from Hamilton’s but that doesn’t mean Jefferson’s perspective was wrong. During the turmoil in Europe with the French Revolution, and the First French Republic’s war against the British-led coalition of monarchies, European farming was heavily disrupted and called for the importation of American crops. In addition, with the invention of the cotton gin, American cotton production skyrocketed as production efficiency increased substantially. This division between Hamiltonian Federalists and Jefferson’s Democratic Republican will lay the foundation of a 2 party dominant political system in the U.S for generations to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The subject of Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation focuses on the lives of the Founding Fathers and how they affected America then, and today. Ellis’s thesis is that there has always been turmoil when it comes to states’ rights and the balance of power, but the American Revolution was ultimately successful due to the bonds between the founding brothers. His motives for writing the book is to show why, “these events and achievements are historically significant because they shaped the subsequent history of the United States, including our own time” .…

    • 873 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    1” by voicing his beliefs that the U.S. will only survive with the creation of a Constitution. Without it, the country will not grow nor become the independent nation it strives to be, “The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the union, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the father of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world” (Hamilton). Hamilton displays that the nation will only stand with a Constitution and it is the obligation of its citizens to form a government based on reason. Each society will choose to create a government that derives from fact or from force. Hamilton works to depict that the people of the United States are unlike any of their predecessors due to the ability to form a country that stems from logic and reason, “[T]o decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” (Hamilton). It is due to their unique and crucial position which enables them to make decisions from reason, that the U.S. citizens must recount all information from both sides of the governmental…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hofstader Analysis

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In The American Political Tradition by Richard Hofstadter, the article, “Founding Fathers: An Age of Reason,” talks about the founding fathers’ views of the American people. From what is printed in textbooks, people give the founding fathers too much esteem, when they really held none for the people. Hofstadter makes the point that the founding fathers had a very negative view of the common American citizen.…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the term “Founding Fathers” ring a bell? Warren G. Harding was the first man on record to refer to the first statesmen of America as the “Founding Fathers;” over fifty years after the last American Revolutionary soldier had died (Bernstein pg. 4). How interesting that this common term that we associate George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, just to name a few, was not such a common term. R.B. Bernstein’s The Founding Fathers Reconsidered, gives us a different view of what we associate “Founding Fathers” to be. All of the founders showed an outstanding ability to adapt not only to unstable environments during the birth of a nation, but to their political environment as well. The author's primary argument was in fact that all the "Fathers" did not get along and share the same views.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights Activist, Julian Bond, wrote about Thomas Jefferson and the question of his hypocrisy in his introduction to Slavery in Monticello. “If we view Jefferson from today’s perspective, his ownership of slaves is at best an embarrassment, and at worst, participation in a crime on the level with the Nazi Holocaust,” (Bond 1). It is conspicuous that the perspective of slavery has changed between revolutionary times and modern day. Today, slavery is seen as a lurid and appalling embarrassment on American history to numerous people. It has entrenched the mentality of racism and white superiority into America and can also be considered the incentive of endemic discrimination seen even in modern day news. However, slavery was not only prevalent, but was a social prerequisite even before the colonization of America. Bond addresses both of these points that state Jefferson participated in one of the most horrid phenomenons in world history , but that he was also an average white man living in a place where freeing slaves was not accepted. Bond continues to address Jefferson’s ownership of slaves and whether this proved his hypocrisy or not. “...his writings show a man who was aware of and wrestled with the moral complications of slavery and the inherent contradiction of American slavery and American freedom,” (Bond 1). This quote could be interpreted in multiple ways. For one, it could be argued that Jefferson was an exceptional man for recognizing the malfeasance of slavery and writing publicly about the matter. On the other hand, Jefferson’s awareness of the depravity of slavery only made his participation in it that much worse. Most white Americans at this time were raised to view slaves and minorities as menial and property. Because of this, many white Americans grew up to be cruel masters to the slaves they inherited and purchased, but some slave owners realized that slavery was essentially wrong. Jefferson was…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Founding Brothers

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Why were major accomplishments of the Founding Brothers during the Revolution unprecedented? (3 Reasons)…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Founding Brothers

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My favorite chapter was the chapter about the duel. The duel was my favorite chapter because the duel seemed never ending and exciting. The chapter began with background information about Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr family lives. After the background information is passed, the chapter goes into great detail about the duel. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton were not friends. Hamilton helped Thomas Jefferson defeat Burr in the Presidential election. later on when Burr was Vice President, he ran for governor in New York. Hamilton had such a great influence on his home state that Burr lost the election to be governor. Burr had challenged Hamilton to a duel because of some offensive comments from Hamilton. Ultimately, Burr had severely wounded Hamilton, who died days later. According to the chapter, two shots were heard, Hamilton died but Burr claims he never shot at Hamilton. So because Burr denies shooting at Hamilton, it makes you think what really happened? This chapter was my favorite because it actually forced me to think about what really happened with the two shots heard.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The Founding Fathers and Slavery (Founding Fathers)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. .…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Founding Brothers

    • 3082 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. Which “founding brother” instructed his wife to start saving all his letters in order to record “the great events which are pressed, and those greater which are rapidly advancing”?…

    • 3082 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founding Brothers Essay

    • 2612 Words
    • 11 Pages

    There were several things that were phenomenal about the founding of the United States. Every event leading up to the founding of the young nation was “unprecedented”. This means there had been no examples previously set to help the founders follow a correct path toward creating a striving nation. Ellis points out that it is easier to look back on what has already happened than to figure out a problematic situation on one’s own. A republic had never been developed amongst a nation as large as the original thirteen colonies. It would be extremely difficult to control especially when the land had no history of cooperating with each other, other than to defeat the British. This is demonstrated by the natives and explorers during the late fifteenth century.…

    • 2612 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Founding Brothers

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The chances of the United States of America surviving as a country were very slim during the revolutionary generation. After winning an almost impossible war it still seemed doubtful that our country would survive. But in the end the people who helped build our country pulled it off. So how did they do it? In the book Founding Brothers Joseph Ellis attempts to answer that question. He does this by giving four main reasons. First, the founding bothers had different personalities and opinions from each other which created multiple solutions to a problem. Second, they all knew each other on a personal level so they were able to work things out face to face. Third, slavery was put aside by the founding brothers so they could focus on keeping the country alive. Finally, they didn’t hide the fact they knew they were going down in history. I felt that Ellis best supported his answers through three chapters.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays