Preview

What Is Hobbes View On Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Hobbes View On Human Nature
I agree with Hobbes point of view because I believe human nature is naturally “evil”, he states “Civil society is the application of force by the state to uphold contracts and so forth.” He’s saying, without the social contract that people are morally obligated to withhold, we would follow our human nature to simply do as we please.

The definition of human nature is “The general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, shared by all humans.” Hobbs had a negative point of view on human nature, he believed our natural human tendency is to be “nasty and brutal…” He believed “without subjection to a common power, men are necessarily at war”. For example, without the guidelines of government telling us how we
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    Sadly, I think Hobbes is correct, though clearly he was writing in the abstract. While all people do have within them elements of both good and bad, as The Osmond Brothers said so succinctly in the 1970's, "one bad apple can spoil the whole darn bunch." Even if 99.99% of the population was good, pure, philanthropic, and just, it only takes one "evil" individual to upset everything. As Hobbes pointed out – everyone must make a singular commitment to have freedom from the natural condition.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Debate on Human Nature and How it Should Play in This Role- Hammurabi
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Debate on Human Nature and How it Should Play in This Role- Hammurabi

    -Human nature refers to the distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling and acting that humans tend to have naturally, independently of the influence of culture.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Leviathan: the Fear That Keeps Government in Place
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Leviathan: the Fear That Keeps Government in Place

    In Leviathan, Hobbes attempts to explain how civil government came to be established. He begins his argument at the most logical place; the fundamental basis of mankind, and makes several key steps in the development of human nature to reach the implementation of a sovereign ruler. Hobbes believes the foundation of mankind is motion. Man is in constant motion and the instability that forms from the collisions that ensue from the constant motion form the state of nature. The state of nature is an inherently dangerous lifestyle, where all members live in a state of constant fear. This fear drives man to consent to a social contract, which establishes a peaceful existence. The social contract is ultimately enforced by the sovereign ruler who uses fear of punishment to ensure man follows the laws created. Man essentially gives up one type of fear for another in an attempt to better human life.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Simulation Analysis
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitution Simulation Analysis

    “according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Enlightenment And Thomas Hobbes
    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Enlightenment And Thomas Hobbes

    Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally selfish, in which he believed that lead people to greed and the ugly human nature of jealousy.“The condition of man . . . is a condition of war of everyone against everyone”.(Thomas Hobbes , https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/10122.Thomas_Hobbes) Also in following the greed, he believed that if there were to be no government, there were aslo to be no peace within the people, athough there were no peace with the neighboring countries.“Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry... no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”(Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan) The social contract was the agreement by in which the people define and limit their individual right;creating an organized society. The social contract was based on an absolute monarchy in which the people would later disagree to and make their revolution. The claim made by Thomas Hobbes, had a major influence on the American Democracy and the French Revolution because of the fears that the people had during this time of…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato - Ideal of the Examined Life
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato - Ideal of the Examined Life

    Human nature is the distinguished characteristics, ways of thinking, feeling and acting that each human has. These characteristics are shaped by the people and environment surrounding us and they are what completely prevent us from following one model or one concept of perfection.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes vs Locke

    Thomas Hobbes believed mankind good and evil depended on what the individual loved and hated. He believed that life in the state of nature is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." (119) Mankind was naturally equal in power of mind and body so no individual was capable of dominating another. In a strictly natural condition there was no justice or injustice because everyone had their right to seek and take whatever is good and dispose of whatever was bad for them. He was for absolute monarchy. Thomas Hobbes believed that “authoritarian governments were necessary to keep human beings’ worst impulses under control.”(119) He did not believe that a large group of men would agree with one and other and peacefully run a country. Hobbes opposed constitutionalism because of his pessimistic view of human nature. The passages in Hobbes writings show that he did not desire the possibility of anything like modern totalitarianism. For Hobbes, any division of power was an invitation to chaos.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature in the Great Gatsby
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature in the Great Gatsby

    Human nature refers to the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. F. Scott Fitzgerald with the use of selection of detail, selective diction, and imagery, portrays both condescending and bona fide aspects of human nature.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crash Human Nature
    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crash Human Nature

    * Human nature is The general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioural traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Individual Rights and Freedoms
    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Individual Rights and Freedoms

    The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract

    According to Rousseau, the civil society is what represses people’s freedom who argues that people’s freedoms are better secured in the state of nature. This point of view sharply contrasts with that of Hobbes who sees the state of nature as one of constant battles. Hobbes sees a civil society as the most ideal way of ensuring that collective freedoms are preserved.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes View Of The State Of Nature
    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes View Of The State Of Nature

    Hobbes credits to each person in the state of nature a liberty right to preserve herself, which he terms “the right of nature”. This is the right to do whatsoever one sincerely judges requiring for one's protection; yet because it is at least possible that virtually anything might be judged necessary for one's protection, this hypothetically limited right of nature becomes in practice an unlimited right to potentially anything, or, as Hobbes puts it, a right “to all things”. Hobbes further assumes that people should accept what they see to be the necessary means to their most important ends.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics