Virginia Supreme Court Case Study
The United States v. Virginia court case was debated on Jan 17, 1996 at Virginia Military Institute. The advocates involved were Paul Bender, who argued the case for the United States and Theodore B. Olson, who argued the case on behalf of Virginia. The U.S was the petitioner, while Virginia was the accused. According to "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court Case and Opinions.” the case was about Virginia Military Institute violating the fourteenth Amendments of Equal Protection by maintaining a public founded Virginia Military Institute as an all-male institution. According to "United States v. Virginia 518 U.S. 515 (1996)." Justia Law, the intention of the VMI was to create “citizen soldiers”, men who are prepared for leadership in civilian life and in military service. The VMI was trying to train male leaders of the future excluding the females.
Also, according to "Supreme Court Rules in VMI Case” The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, there was a dissenting opinion by Justice Scalia:
"Today the Court shuts down an institution that has served the people of the Commonwealth of Virginia with …show more content…
The Supreme Court ruled that the Commonwealth of Virginia violated the Equal Protection Clause by a 7-1 vote maintaining the publicly funded Virginia Military Institute as an all-male institution. The Court reasoned that Virginia did not show an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for excluding all women from the citizen-soldier training. The district court ruled in favor of VMI so I think Virginia won. The court rejected the equal protection challenge pressed by the Unites States. Virginia proposed a parallel program for women known as the Virginia Women’s Institute for Leadership (VWIL), located at Mary Baldwin College a private liberal arts school for women to remedy the constitutional violation. The district court later decided that the plan met the requirements of the Equal Protection
Also, according to "Supreme Court Rules in VMI Case” The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, there was a dissenting opinion by Justice Scalia:
"Today the Court shuts down an institution that has served the people of the Commonwealth of Virginia with …show more content…
The Supreme Court ruled that the Commonwealth of Virginia violated the Equal Protection Clause by a 7-1 vote maintaining the publicly funded Virginia Military Institute as an all-male institution. The Court reasoned that Virginia did not show an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for excluding all women from the citizen-soldier training. The district court ruled in favor of VMI so I think Virginia won. The court rejected the equal protection challenge pressed by the Unites States. Virginia proposed a parallel program for women known as the Virginia Women’s Institute for Leadership (VWIL), located at Mary Baldwin College a private liberal arts school for women to remedy the constitutional violation. The district court later decided that the plan met the requirements of the Equal Protection