Preview

Violence And Bloodshed In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
164 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violence And Bloodshed In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
Violence and bloodshed can never have morally good results is the best way to describe William Shakespeare's Tragedy of Julius Caesar. When the conspirators decided not to kill Marc Antony they would regret that because, after the murder of Caesar; Antony want revenge of the fallen leader. After Burtis explain why they killed Caesar to the plebeians then they allowed Marc Anthony to say his peace but he started a rebelling against the conspirators, on the way to kill the conspirators the angry plebeians killed Cinna the poet just because he had the name name as one of the conspirators. Battle of Philippi was a battle of Mark Antony and Octavian forces against Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus forces in the end Brutus and Cassius

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The killing of Julius Caesar was not so much an act of simple brutality as it was a significant turning point in history. The play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare depicts various members of Roman society conspiring to and eventually killing Julius Caesar; subsequently causing chaos to spread in Rome. During their orations, Brutus and Antony employ various strategies in order to receive the crowd’s support in their respective causes.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thus, by concentrating on the main levers of government in his hands, Caesar was able to control all the main spheres of life of the Roman society. He expanded the social composition of the ruling elites, integrating almost all the available layers of Roman society into it, and he solved a number of vitally important social issues that helped him to restore peace in the…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everybody "[bows] to Caesar", and they love Caesar, and even offer him the crown (Parenti 5).…

    • 2644 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos, Pathos, and Logos are modes of persuasion often used to convince audiences. Ethos pertains to the speaker’s expertise, credibility, and honesty. Pathos relates to the speaker’s feelings and emotions, while logos is an appeal to reason and logic. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony uses these elements to nullify the effect of Brutus’ convincing explanation of Caesar’s murder and to change the minds of the plebeians. Antony’s speech had an immense impact on the minds and opinions of the plebeians for he was able to turn the crowd against Brutus.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” a group of conspirators plot to kill the ambitious Caesar. Their plot is successful and Caesar is murdered in the Capitol while his right-hand man, Mark Antony, flees. Antony returns and asks the conspirators if he can speak to the public about Caesar’s death. Brutus grants Antony’s request, but on the requirement that Brutus gives a speech first. Brutus uses Ethos to make the Romans believe he’s one of them, Logos to give reason for killing Caesar, and Pathos to show he did love Caesar. Meanwhile Antony uses Ethos the same as Brutus, to convince the people he’s one of them, Logos to show Caesar wasn't ambitious, and Pathos to portray his true liking for Caesar.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, it is argumentative that Julius Caesar appears to fit the definition of a tragic hero, however it is also believed by a large sum of individuals that Marcus Brutus is found to be a more fitting character to the definition of a tragic hero. Written by William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is based upon a plot which revolves around the common theme of a tragedy, which can be perceived as a dramatic composition that often involves verses as well as a death of a high class individual, during the Elizabethan era.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus has a very strong desire to serve the people of Rome, and does not care much for himself. Brutus sees the good in all of his ‘friends’ even after it has become transparent that they have manipulated him for their own personal gains. After the war, before killing himself, Brutus proceeds to say, “I shall have glory by this losing day. More than Octavius and Mark Antony.” Brutus says he has the most glory out of all the leaders, even though he has lost the battle, creating a sense of catharsis within the readers. Despite losing the war, he has remained a noble and moral leader. Even Antony, who turned against him, after winning the war, acknowledged how righteous and honest Brutus was, and thus Brutus died an honorable death.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, honor and betrayal are a huge factor. A lot of times, different characters make it seem like it’s ok to betray one another to either keep a secret or defend their honor. In my opinion, it seems very selfish, but in the play they do it because everyone else does it. It’s kind of like a natural habit like it’s no big deal. Throughout the play, I learned why and about the reasons they all betray each other, all about honor, and both their roles in the play.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Et tu Brute?” Caesar sputtered before falling into the darkness known as death. But this was not the end of Caesar however. Caesar returns to this world as a “shade” or ghost form. In fact, in this form he exerts more influence over Brutus than he ever did in mortal form. “Caesar is more powerful in his spirit for to affect Brutus than in his mortal form. It is in this ghost form, Caesar full-fills his revenge on Brutus.” (netessays.net) Revenge did not occur in the ancient world only in plays and stories. Revenge was a way of life, an every day belief of the ancient times.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus only has two choices in act II of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, to kill caesar or to let the roman republic fall under caesar. Brutus decides to kill Caesar under the manipulation of Cassius. But to be able to make that decision he had to be under a certain mindset which involved many different things. In the beginning of act II Brutus decides that he must kill Julius Caesar but, with that he must have been under a certain mindset which was contributed to by many things.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays