Preview

Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar
To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant. Julius Caesar had been a part of many battles and wars, in which he has come out victorious. Colombia Electronic Encyclopedia points out that “He excelled in war, in statesmanship, and in oratory”(Colombia Electronic Encyclopedia 16). In the war against Gnaeus Pompeius, Julius came out quite victorious. In fact, Anderson notes “On August 9, 48 BC Julius Caesar defeated Gnaeus Pompeius on the plains of pharsalus”(Anderson 1). Anderson also stated “ Caesar destroyed another Pompeian …show more content…
Julius was not selfish in any way. During his reign he helped many find homes, with taxes, and many more. Miola and Bloom stated “ His generosity United all Romans as familial Lagatees, and though he shows superbial , he places self last and others first” ( Miola and Bloom 1). Julius showed qualities that a good leader should always have. All in all, the assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader. Although others believe that he wa a tyrant, they were still

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Back when the Roman Empire was still in one piece; a man named Julius Caesar, set out to rule it all. The senate of Rome saw Caesar as a threat to their power in the Roman government and, seeing that Caesar was about to become Emperor, they killed him. One question still stands “would Julius Caesar become a ruthless tyrant, or a great ruler of Rome?” , Caesar was a great man. Caesar had a heart for the people of Rome, Providing them with food, jobs, sanitation, and water, as is stated in “Killing Caesar” written by Jon Herman, “The hungry hordes of the city were now given bread.”…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DBQ On Julius Caesar

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gaius Julius Caesar was a brilliant general, a great politician, and a powerful dictator of the Roman republic. He was born on July 17, 100 BC and he was assassinated on March 15, 44…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a great debate to decide whether Caesar was a tyrant or hero. Based on the information from the passage “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, Caesar is more a hero then tyrant. The average citizen of Rome felt that Caesar was a blessing.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The majority of the conspirators decided to assassinate him while the Senate sat in session. Because Julius Caesar and the conspirators would be the only ones inside the Senate building this created a perfect opportunity to carry out their dastardly plans. Hidden beneath their togas, the conspirators wielded their daggers and surprised Caesar with their mutiny.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar happened on March 15th of 44 B.C. It was a conspiracy by many Roman senators and was led by Marcus Brutus, Caesar's best friend, and Gaius Longinus. At this time, Caesar was the leader of the Roman Republic and had been declared the dictator perpetou. Several senators feared that Caesar wanted to overthrow the senate for tyranny. As Caesar entered the theatre ofPompey, he was intercepted by several senators who led him to a room next to the east portico. Once the meeting started, Caesar was approached by Tillius Cimber to present a petition on behalf of his exiled brother. Cimber grabbed and pulled Caesar's toga off his shoulder. This was the signal to start the attack. Caesar was attacked by over 60 members…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar in the play "The tragedy of Julius Caesar" was a in line to be the next ruler of Ancient Rome. Caesar becomes drunk in power as most people would when there are roughly a million people adoring you. The people of Ancient Rome truly liked Caesar, in fact in Act 1 Scene 1, a commoner says "..we are taking holiday for Caesar's arrival.." In this act the reader gets a sense on how much the people like Caesar. However it is also shown to the reader how much noblemen do not like or trust Caesar to be a good leader. Throughout Act 1 and 2 Cassius is trying to convince Brutus, one of Caesar's good friends, to help them murder Caesar so he could take the crown. Brutus and his followers believe they are doing a service to the people. That in some way sacrificing Caesar is for the better good. However this being said Caesar's death was not a sacrifice it was a butchery, there is no need to go out and kill someone.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar was a strong, brave military leader. When Caesar left Rome to fight a war against his once great friend Pompey, he wasn’t defeated and came back to Rome victorious (Act I, scene i, line 32-39). In Rome or any great empire, a leader must be a fearless military warrior and Julius Caesar is one of the best when it comes to being victorious.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everybody "[bows] to Caesar", and they love Caesar, and even offer him the crown (Parenti 5).…

    • 2644 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many say Caesar was courageous until he was killed, which resulted in him expanding Rome during his military career. He was an overall fair general that gained respect and did whatever it took to gain victories. Plutarch, a historian, once said “he gained so much upon the people, that everyone was eager to find out new offices and new honors for him in return for his munificence.”…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar, son of Gaius and Aurelia Caesar, became dictator of the Roman empire in 44 B.C.. Being named ‘Dictator for life’ did not come easy. Caesar had shown the Roman Empire that he was dependable enough to make the right decisions at the right time, especially in the military. In fact, Caesar is often remembered as one of the best military minds in history. He was a very successful man when it came to government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is because he created the 10th Legion and proved himself to be an adept military leader (Biography.com Editors 14). Also, Caesar reformed the Roman calendar and greatly increased the size of the Roman Senate (Biography.com Editors 14). However, everything Caesar did was only to increase his influence with the people of Rome so that he could become more powerful. For instance, the only reason Caesar expanded the Roman Senate, was so that he could fill it with allies who would later advocate for him. Moreover, Caesar ruled as dictator for only a year before his assassination, the majority of his actions that took place beforehand that are often seen as good were only a campaign that Caesar was a part of in an attempt to gain popularity, one in which he succeeded. Overall, everything Caesar did was for himself, although he was an innovative think as well as an adept military leader, he had a blatant disregard for the prosperity of all of his people, even the ones that he viewed as being…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was Saturday night and Julius Caesar was sitting on his recliner chair and suddenly there was a loud “Knock Knock”. Julius walked to the door opened it and then ‘Bang!’ Julius…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The meaning of assassination is restore the Republic, but the Republic had been composed by Caesar. He settled works for governors and senators for many years before his death. “Caesar that benefited individuals and groups could not be rescinded” (159 Mackay). Caesar was intelligent leader that organized his country well so even the after death, Republic could have a straight drive on the road base on Caesar’s plans. “They completely miss lead situation” (159 Mackay). Even after death of Caesar the Republic ran well; the Conspirator did kill tyrants but the outcome was idleness. “The conspirators expected the republic simply to start functioning again”(159 Mackay). They simply thought restoration is not a problem but worstly Roman didn’t…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays