Preview

Thucydide vs Plato on The Good Life

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1929 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thucydide vs Plato on The Good Life
Thucydides Versus Plato: Differing Views of the Good Life What is the true nature of the Good Life? Is it living life with concern for only oneself despite the possible consequences of one's action on others? Or might it involve self-sacrifice in effort to do what one feels is right or just? Is it descriptive, or perhaps prescriptive? Two prominent Greeks, Thucydides and Plato, began providing answers to these questions over 25 centuries ago as they analyzed and wrote critically about life's ethical implications. They shined contrasting light on what is right, just, and good; as well as ways to achieve true happiness. In short, each gave an opinion on how to garner the Good Life. Let's start by taking a look at Thucydides, a general in the Athenian army. Thucydides, one of the earliest true historians, chronicled the Peloponnesian War. Being scientifically-oriented, his descriptions of the lengthy war between Athens and Sparta were empirical. His account of events raised questions: What actions are justified to achieve happiness? Does justice fluctuate between times of war and peace? He seems to indicate might makes right, at least in times of war. In conflict, acting from a position of strength may be the best route leading to the Good Life. A clear example exists when he recalls interaction between Athens and Melos in the Melian Dialogues. As we enter Thucydides' chronicle, the Athenian army is squaring-off against the small island territory of Melos following Melian refusal to succumb peacefully to the larger, stronger force. Athenian leaders have dispatched representatives to speak with the leaders of Melos, but by now Athenians are determined to take over the small island at all costs. However, the Melians think they may be able to avoid war with the Athenian army since Melos is affiliated with Sparta via heritage and has been neutral in the confrontation between Athens and Sparta. During their meeting the Athenians inform the


Cited: "2B - Ethics in America: The Traditions of Ethics", courtesy of Thomas Edison State College YouTube.com, n.d. Web. Newton, Lisa. Ethics in America Source Reader. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc., 2004. Print. Newton, Lisa. Ethics in America Study Guide. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc., 2005. Print. Wicander, Reed, et al. Historical Geology. California: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, 2010. Print. Total word count for title and body is 920.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Borgmann, A. (2006). Real American Ethics: Taking responsibility for our country. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greeknon Swot Analysis

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An empire might, for instance, use its military power to acquire strategically placed territories. "By conquering you," proclaimed the Athenian ambassadors, "we shall increase not only the size but the security of our empire." For Athens there were obvious geostrategic advantages to wresting Melos from its inhabitants. The island was ideally positioned off the southeast coast of the Peloponnesus. Operating from bases on the island, the formidable Athenian navy could conduct operations along the Spartan periphery, amplifying the already dominant seapower of…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Athens’ quest for a great empire, they planned to dominate their lesser foes, add to their empire, and show their strength; these pursuits brought them to the city of Melos. Melos was a small island in the Aegean Sea and a colony of Sparta, but they where a neutral state; they were not allied with either side. They had not been involved in the Peloponnesian war as of yet, and did not plan on getting involved. Then, Athens came, demanding surrender and tribute, but Melos chose to resist, rather than submit. Athens believed that because they had might on their side, that they also had the right to conquer weaker city-states (“The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”).…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi-286 Mod 3 Wa 1

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Newton, L. (2004). Ethics in america source reader. (2nd ed., pp. 96-97, 101-110, 119-120). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thucydides vs Plato

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare and contrast Thucydides’ and Socrates’ analyses of the fate of Athenian democracy in war, of why the Athenians went to war, and of how and why they failed.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Waller, B. (2008). Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydides vs Plato

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thucydides and Plato had contrasting ways in their approach on the good life. Thucydides displays empirical thinking in his studies of human nature and behavior during the Peloponnesian War and Plato displays normative thinking in his books and dialogs in particular "The Republic"…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    melian dialogue

    • 3061 Words
    • 13 Pages

    THE next summer Alcibiades sailed with twenty ships to Argos and seized the suspected persons still left of the Lacedaemonian faction to the number of three hundred, whom the Athenians forthwith lodged in the neighbouring islands of their empire. The Athenians also made an expedition against the isle of Melos with thirty ships of their own, six Chian, and two Lesbian vessels, sixteen hundred heavy infantry, three hundred archers, and twenty mounted archers from Athens, and about fifteen hundred heavy infantry from the allies and the islanders. The Melians are a colony of Lacedaemon that would not submit to the Athenians like the other islanders, and at first remained neutral and took no part in the struggle, but afterwards upon the Athenians using violence and plundering their territory, assumed an attitude of open hostility. Cleomedes, son of Lycomedes, and Tisias, son of Tisimachus, the generals, encamping in their territory with the above armament, before doing any harm to their land, sent envoys to negotiate. These the Melians did not bring before the people, but bade them state the object of their mission to the magistrates and the few; upon which the Athenian envoys spoke as follows:…

    • 3061 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Athens Vs Melians

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page

    2. The Melians do not trust Athens. They say that their military is too powerful for them to trust. They say that it is best for them not to get involved with Athens for the sake of the countries safety. They think that Athens is making it too obvious that they want to destroy the Melians since Athens is risking their safety to try and unite with the Melians. The Melians want to trust the gods instead of trust Athens. They believe that the gods will help them and if anything goes bad, Sparta, out of sympathy, will help them.…

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The course of history has shown that during times of confusion or disaster, people's true human nature emerges. Unlike the view of Gandhi, in these moments humans behave violently and are concerned with self-interest, supporting the Athenian's view of human motivation. In the History of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides gives ample support of this view of human nature. Generally regarded as one of the first true historians, he wanted to view the world as it really was and firmly insisted on sticking to the facts. Thucydides subjected human nature to an extremely cold and reductive analysis, which could be regarded as pessimism, but he considered to be realism. Generally people want to maintain a positive self-concept of themselves which causes them to agree with the overly idealistic views of human nature, such as that presented by Gandhi.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Good Life

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What makes a person’s life good? Is it virtue? Pleasure? Power? In Plato’s Gorgias, though didn’t end up with a mutual agreement, Socrates and Callacles fight each other’s views and quarrel to come to a conclusion of the meaning of a good life.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Dating in the Workplace

    • 3723 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Landensen, Robert F. (2008 Feb 21). Ethics Bowl . Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.iit.edu/ Web site: http://ethics.iit.edu/eb/index.html…

    • 3723 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition Of Victory

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consider the Athenians’ actions after their victory at Pylos. A humbled Sparta sued for peace. This peace would have secured the Athenian “war objectives”, but because of the damage inflicted on Attica by the Spartan Army, the Athenian leaders rejected the offer to pursue greater “war objectives”. This shift in objectives led Athens to ultimate humiliation and ruin. (Thucydides p 549)…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book two of Plato’s Republic identifies the differences between and defines what it means to live a just life and an unjust life. This provides us with specific details of which life is actually the better life to live. I believe that in our society today, the unjust life can have many consequences where as the just life does not truly have many benefits like it should. Because of this, I think it leads people to be more inclined to do more unjust acts more often than just, but only if they think they could get away with it. If a person had the opportunity to commit an unjust act and knowingly get away with it, or live an unjust life, I believe that numerous individuals would commit the unjust act over the just…

    • 2067 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays