Preview

Socrates Good Life

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1152 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Good Life
What makes a person’s life good? Is it virtue? Pleasure? Power? In Plato’s Gorgias, though didn’t end up with a mutual agreement, Socrates and Callacles fight each other’s views and quarrel to come to a conclusion of the meaning of a good life. What is a good life in Socrates’ perspective? In order to get his point across, Socrates first phrases the question of what is more shameful - doing what is unjust or suffering what is unjust. For him, doing what is unjust is more shameful than suffering it. Even Polus, another philosophical figure that often clashed views with Socrates, ended up agreeing with him. However, Callicles did not. Callicles counter-argues that what Socrates is saying is only true “by law” and not “by nature.” Of course …show more content…
What Callicles views as a happy and good life seemed “insatiable [and] undisciplined,” like a leaky jar. Just like it is better for a jar to be faultless, one’s soul should be faultless also because isn’t one better off with “the orderly life, the life that is satisfied with its circumstances”? Socrates states that the leaky jar equals a life that is not orderly. He says that a good life is when one has a comfortable amount of content in one’s jar, an amount that one can handle. A bad life is when the content spills, overflows, or leaks because of the lack of discipline and restraint. A bad life is when one cannot restrain oneself from getting more than one can comfortably handle. As an analogy, he talks about two men with jars full of things that scare and difficult to come by. Man #1 doesn’t put anything more into his jars and relaxes. Man #2 has jars that are leaky and rotten, so he must constantly fill them if he does not want to suffer pain. To this, Callicles says he would rather be Man #2 because since Man #1 has filled himself up, he will experience neither joy nor pain, which is a life of a stone. For him, living pleasantly isn’t being full or content; one can experience pleasure “as much as possible flow in”, because any pleasure, even scratching an itch, is pleasure. And of course Socrates disagrees saying that it isn’t right to say all pleasure is good because pleasures can be good and bad, no matter how enjoyable …show more content…
Callicles fails to see what Socrates sees as good, and Socrates fails to see what Callicles sees as good. There is no definite answer to this question. However, I cannot help but listen to Socrates more. Maybe it was the way Callicles argued, how he attacked Socrates’ character - “…aren’t you ashamed, at your age…?” - instead of what Socrates was saying, but Callicles seemed more emotional and biased compared to Socrates’ stable and factual responses. But once I put aside the two people’s tone and choice of words, I agreed with everything that Socrates said; especially that being disciplined and law-abiding is good for the soul. Because that is truth, nothing good comes to those who disobey the law, it’s better to follow it than ignore it. However, what Socrates’ thinks is a good life seems impossible. Aren’t we all leaky jars? Aren’t we all faulty in our own ways? I feel like even if we were man #1, the one who just relaxes over his full jar, we will someday later want more or get tired of the substance in that jar and want a different substance. So is it really a good life if it’s not attainable? What Callicles sees as good is the more realistic view of this world. We are constantly working to be happy, working to be good; and sure, some people do fall in the wrong path. However, experiencing the bad in life makes you appreciate the good in life more than before. So in a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates beforehand disproving Gorgias and Polus in The Gorgias, now takes on a rival who he deems qualified enough: Callicles. Here, they discuss the value of temperance and the indulgence of pleasures. Callicles remarks to Socrates, “In the rightly-developed man the passions ought not to be controlled, but that we should let them grow to the upmost and somehow or other satisfy them, and that that is virtue” (Plato 74). Callicles says that to allow growth and indulge in your desires is real virtue. A man who is slave of his own restraint cannot be happy. According to him, satisfying longings is natural and even noble, but because the weaker cannot attain this and are ashamed of their own weakness, they reprimand intemperance and instead praise…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athenians live as the society tells them to live, and they follow their own traditions, customs, and morals of the rest of the people. Socrates has never forced Athenians to follow his teachings, on the contrary he lets them do it without getting anything in return. He states “And I cannot justly be held responsible for the good or bad conduct of these people, as I never promised to teach them anything.” (33a-b) He doesn’t directly influence society, he tries to make them aware of their lack of knowledge; it then becomes their responsibility to fill the void exposed by Socrates. Therefore, he believes they have not examined their own lives. Socrates believes an examined life is one that is reflective, where we examine actions on the basis of…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On theme with this shift, the men are arguing about whether is it good for a man to be take what he wants regardless of whether it is just or not. Polus and Gorgias are, for all intense and purposes, on the same side of the arguments, and, as such, Polus often steps up to continue the arguing without Gorgias chiming in. Such is true for the sections 468e6-470c3 of Gorgias, which begins with Socrates and Polus locked in a heated discussion about whether or not one should envy the man who was doing whatever he pleases, whether it be killing or stealing or anything else. Polus asserts that he is enviable as he is getting whatever he wants, while Socrates argues that one should actually pity this man as he is “unenviable” and “wretched” (469a3-4). As per usual, Polus is flabbergasted with Socrates’ position and goes to question him further.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because people only live once, they desire a happy and successful life, in other words, a “good life.” To complete this goal of a good life, a majority of society will do nearly everything possible to be comfortable and be happy. The extremes, which people go to in order to achieve what they think is necessary, are merely shadows, or illusions of reality that are believed to lead people to a good life. However, according to the prominent Greek philosopher, Plato, the good life is one in which individuals are not entirely comfortable and happy. The good life is one in which they are finding the ultimate truth and becoming open-minded, sometimes forcing them to oppose the norms of society, and escape the shadows. Though it is hard to do, people who abandon the “cave” of false reality and misinterpretation will live a true good life. The people who have escaped the cave have enlightened themselves by thinking…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is in this phase that one begins to understand the origin of their actions. One may think they are pursuing something for one reason, when really there is an unconscious desire that is the true cause of the action. In Plato’s Gorgias (488B-491A), Socrates uses his question and answer technique to the extreme. Socrates continuously asks Callicles, in what may seem like a redundant process, to further explain his idea of the terms ‘better’ and ‘superior’. It is clear through this questioning process that Callicles has many discrepancies in his understanding that weaken his overall…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and a fellow interlocutor, Callicles of Acharnae, fervently discuss the relationship between pleasure and good. It is in this philosophical debate that Callicles states a good life as one that consists of having as much unrestricted pleasure as possible; therefore, implying that the pleasant and the good are identical. However, Socrates contends otherwise, and attempts to convince Callicles of the error in his ways by proving that good is ultimately not the same as pleasure. Socrates does so by employing two key arguments that render Callicles case unsupported and fallacious.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What did it mean for a man in Ancient Greece to lead a good life, according to Platos’s four dialogs in the Trial and Death of Socrates?…

    • 1014 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s writings on happiness are seen as a representation of Socrate’s view since Plato was his student, and presents his writings on happiness in three dialogues, namely Euthydemus, The Symposium and The Republic. As to necessary conditions for happiness in the Euthydemus, he argues first that happiness is what everybody desires; it is the end or goal of all our activities, unconditional good; secondly, he says that happiness does not depend on external things but rather how those things are used. For instance, one cannot claim that money brings happiness, but rather how money is used is what determines happiness. An ignorant person will waste away the money and end up worse than before, but a wise person will use the money well for his own good, and the same applies to external things, such as looks or even…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He supports this claim by asking Polus what it is about certain things that makes them admirable. Together they come to the conclusion that what is admirable is defined as what is good and pleasurable; consequently, what is shameful is that which is painful and evil. Using this definition, Socrates questions whether or not it is more painful for a person who acts unjustly than for one who suffers injustice. Polus quickly denies this, and so Socrates is able to say that doing what is unjust is more shameful and evil than suffering from it.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his writings he has describes two contrasting views of the important issue that is ultimately asking the question, why be moral? Plato and Thrasymachus represent the different and some-what opposing ideas on this topic of morality and self interest. Thrasymachus believes that the right thing to do is act unjustly or unmorally because one should always proceed to act in one's own self interest. He states, "Why should I be moral when it is not in my interest to be so?" This is called egoism proper. In his mind the perfect life would be to have a great reputation for living in perfect justice while being completely unjust. This would constitute a life of benefits, pleasure and rewards of injustices while still maintaining the reflection of a good…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates viewpoint about remaining in jail and being executed is all based on the idea that if he breaks out of jail he would be unjust, and just in general goes against his beliefs. “ Socrates wants to abide by the law because he respected the city as well as the laws that governed Athens. Living by such laws allowed Socrates to lead what he perceived to be the just life, therefore the good life. For Socrates “it is never right to commit injustice or return injustice to defend one self against injury by retaliation. “ “ Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him.” If Socrates would to escape, then it would be breaking the law. Even if he felt that the jury was wrong for convicting him, his intention is not to return a wrong for another wrong. Socrates can’t escape if he thinks that doing that action is unjust, he has personal principles which is that just action is the right action and going against that principle would be unjust. To do an unjust action ruins one soul and life isn’t worth living with a ruined soul. Socrates believed that there was no point in living, if his life was not moral and just. To him quality of his life is more important than the quantity of it. In addition, Athens protects him with right and laws and he feels that in return he has to obey them by being just.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the central claims of Plato’s Republic is that justice is not only desirable for its own sake, but that it maximises the happiness of those who practice it. This paper examines Plato’s arguments in support of this thesis to determine (a) what he means by happiness, (b) to what extent it exists in his proposed ideal state, and (c) whether this in any way substantiates his claims about the benefits of justice. In particular, I will argue that there are two different conceptions of happiness at play in The Republic, and two methods of achieving its highest form, namely the pursuit of justice and philosophy, before arriving at a final definition of the Platonic Form1 of happiness—a matter that Plato touches on only briefly in the text, but that is nevertheless central to his thinking on the subject.…

    • 2738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Socrates, there are common practices and contracts people enter into in order to live in a society. A good life is inherently virtuous and, according to Socrates, there are certain rules to follow in order to attain virtuosity. Socrates believed that virtue was knowledge. His mission was to encourage people to think for themselves and thus become more virtuous. One example of Socrates devotion to rules and regulations is cited in the Crito. Socrates ' word choice including words such as "never" and "always," suggest stern, unbreakable rules. "It is never right to commit injustice or return injustice" (Plato 89). In Athens, Socrates believes, the laws reign supreme and according to the law, Socrates was justifiably guilty. Socrates was sentenced to death based on a conviction of a court upheld by the laws. The finality of the decision of the laws vis-à-vis the court became the final answer regarding Socrates guilt and impending death. When a comrade of Socrates came to visit him in prison with the hope of convincing him to run away, Socrates stood firm in his…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays