Preview

This Essay Is Compared Nuclear Power Against Fossil Fuels . in This Essay , I Will Show Efficency of the Nuclear Energy Compared to Fossil Fuels.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
This Essay Is Compared Nuclear Power Against Fossil Fuels . in This Essay , I Will Show Efficency of the Nuclear Energy Compared to Fossil Fuels.
This essay is compared Nuclear power against Fossil Fuels . In this essay , I will show efficency of the Nuclear energy compared to Fossil Fuels.
First of all , Nuclear power is the use of sustained nuclear fission to generate heat and electricity. Nuclear power plants provided about 5.7% of the world's energy and 13% of the world's electricity.The IAEA( International Atomic Energy Agency ) reported there were 439 nuclear power reactors in operation in the world, operating in 31 countries. According to Ewan McLeish in "The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power," a pellet of nuclear fuel weighs approximately 0.1 ounce (6 grams). However, it can yield the amount of energy equivalent to that generated by a metric tonne of coal, which makes it much more efficient.
Secondly ,Fossil fuels were formed from the organic remains of prehistoric plants and animals. These remains, which are millions of years old, were converted by heat and pressure in the earth's crust into carbon-containing fuels.Both nuclear and fossil fuel power plants produce electricity the same way. The heat generated in these plants is used to generate steam. This steam drives a turbine, which powers a generator that converts mechanical energy to electrical energy.The costs of the production are different. Nuclear takes 1.92 cents to produce one kilowatt-hour of nuclear power. For coal powered plants, it takes 1.88 cents; for natural gas power plants, it takes 2.68 cents; and for oil powered power plants, it takes 3.77 cents to generate the same amount of power.
In conclusion , Nuclear energy is much more efficient than energy from Fossil fuels but the cost of nuclear energy not so low . Coal is the cheapest way to produce power . In my view , people need to improve alternative resources of production an electrisity

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With nuclear power came what was thought to be a more clean alternative to burning coal and other fossil fuels; Nuclear power does not produce nearly as much of the greenhouse gases as coal produces. People and society have given nuclear power a bad name, considering the amount of accidents that have happened. Although when you look at statistics it’s not as many as you would believe, or expect. When nuclear power is put head to head with coal power, nuclear power is the more efficient, and the safest way of power production. There are several reasons for this like the amount of fuel burned, pollution levels, and the effect it has on the environment.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Exploration

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear energy can be very dangerous but can also be cleaner than other energy sources by creating less pollution than fossil fuels. It is an advanced form of energy that has only been available for the past 50 years. It is very similar to fossil fuel in that it uses steam turbines to produce electricity. It uses uranium to produce heat in a process called nuclear fission where neutrons are smashed into the nucleus of atoms splitting them and releasing heat energy.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear fission is used to produce the energy provided by nuclear reactors in nuclear power stations. There are over 400 power plants in more than 30 countries worldwide, 100 of which are situated in the United States. "The energy produced by these power stations generates 17% of the world's electricity." Nuclear fission reactors have proven to be a practical energy source, "the fission of an atom of uranium produces 10 million times the energy produced by the combustion of an atom of carbon from coal." It has been saving money and making effective use of uranium for years.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is stated that almost two billion people on this planet still live without the having to life enhancing energy services like heat and light. But it does not mean that we should start using dirty and harmful nuclear energy rather than safe and efficient renewable energy. Though it is true that renewable resources are difficult to extract but it also true and is proved fact that nuclear resources contain carbons which is harmful for the climate and if the world has to come up from this climatic crisis then renewable energy is the right tool.Moreover,solar energy,biomass,geothermal should be replace by the nuclear energy. This would not only help the world come out of the climatic crisis but also will help world come out of the poverty, widespread hunger and all other problems that the world has facing for years now. Moreover, Sailor.C argues that decarbonised fossil fuels can be used to lower the damaging effect of nuclear energy. But he mentions that this also requires a lot of capital. But if investment has to be done on decarbonised fossil fuels then why not to do the investment on the renewable energy which is far better and safe then the nuclear…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, nuclear power is a clean and low-carbon power. Nuclear power generation does not directly release carbon dioxide or air pollutants, thus will not cause air pollution. Instead of burning fossil fuels, using nuclear power is more efficient in alleviating global warming. From the successful example of France, we can see that countries with high population density…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CAE Writing help - essay

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fossil fuel energy sources, such as oil and coal, are often labeled as bad for the environment, and as unsuitable for long-term energy supplies. The current debate centers on whether to replace fossil fuels with nuclear energy, or with non-nuclear alternatives, such as solar power and wind power. In your opinion, should governments encourage nuclear or non-nuclear energy sources? Give reasons to support your views.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human beings have been using fossil fuels for hundreds of years, satisfying the demand of industrialization. The behavior of using fossil fuels, on the other hand, causes huge pollution, such as soil, water and atmosphere contamination. In addition, fossil fuels, such as solid, liquid and gas, are all facing on the exhaustion. It is evidential that the situations need to be checked or repressed. However, the solutions should satisfy the urgent requirement of energy as well. Nuclear and solar energy are two clean, practicable solutions for human beings. Because they have been tested and been put to use since the mid twentieth century. On the surface, nuclear and solar energy seem absolutely different in other aspects except for low direct pollution and practicability. In fact, they share some significant similarities while they are totally different in other aspects. This essay will concentrate on comparing and contrasting nuclear and solar energy by discussing the similarities in gas emissions, high expend in increasing efficiency and electricity price, and the differences in safety and equipments.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Electrical power can be generated many ways, Coal, Natural Gas, Hydro Dams, Oil, Solar, Wind, and Nuclear are the major options. All of these choices have advantages and disadvantages regarding the impact to our environment. Considering all of the options for generating power and the implications to our environment, nuclear power may be the safe, environmentally friendly, responsible way to power our future.…

    • 2467 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear power generation provides people a way to achieve the goal of lowercarbon which makes power generation more environmentally-friendly.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    About Myself Short Essay

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear Power is produced when a nucleus absorbs a neutron and splits into two lighter nuclei. This releases enormous amounts of energy which in turn produces heat. In fact the Uranium, which is the most common element used to produce nuclear power today, has an energy content about 3 million times greater than that of fossil fuel. Consequently 1 gram of Uranium is equivalent to approximately 3 tones of coal. Nuclear reactors harness the heat which is produced from the energy released when the atom splits and convert it into electrical energy. Current Nuclear Power plants require the the use of the rare Uranium isotope U-235 and consequently only use one fifth of the total energy content. Next generation reactors forecast to be available in 2020's will use all the energy in Uranium or the more abundant Thorium.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays