The Role of Just-in-Time Implementation in Relation to Performance: an Exploratory Study
THE ROLE OF JUST-IN-TIME IMPLEMENTATION IN RELATION TO PERFORMANCE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
By Che Ruhana Isa (PhD)* Tay Yew Keong Faculty of Business & Accountancy University of Malaya
ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between the level of just-in-time (JIT) implementation and performance. The study employed self-administered questionnaire survey to collect data from Malaysian manufacturing companies. The statistical tests provide empirical evidence to support the predictions that the level of JIT implementation is related to perceived performance. The results reveal that the level of JIT implementation is positively related to both financial and non financial performance.
*Corresponding author email: cruhana@um.edu.my
1
THE ROLE OF JUST-IN-TIME IMPLEMENTATION IN RELATION TO PERFORMANCE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
1.
INTRODUCTION
Over the last two decades, firms globally are facing increasing pressures to attain and sustain their competitive position and performance. To survive in in today’s dynamic and competitive markets, firms need to come up with strategies consistent with its environmental demands for efficiency, effectiveness and customer responsiveness. In view of the escalating threats from global players, especially those from China, Malaysian manufacturing firms are compelled to continuously review their strategies and devise plans to improve their operations if they were to survive and prosper. Currently, products from China have flooded the Malaysian market at very competitive prices and for the Malaysian manufacturers to counter the impending threats successfully; they need to be more efficient in their operations so that their manufacturing performance could be improved. One of the strategies to improve manufacturing performance is adoption of worldclass, lean and integrated manufacturing strategies such as just-in-time (JIT) system (Fullerton & McWatters, 2002). Some of the benefits of JIT would allow companies to
By Che Ruhana Isa (PhD)* Tay Yew Keong Faculty of Business & Accountancy University of Malaya
ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between the level of just-in-time (JIT) implementation and performance. The study employed self-administered questionnaire survey to collect data from Malaysian manufacturing companies. The statistical tests provide empirical evidence to support the predictions that the level of JIT implementation is related to perceived performance. The results reveal that the level of JIT implementation is positively related to both financial and non financial performance.
*Corresponding author email: cruhana@um.edu.my
1
THE ROLE OF JUST-IN-TIME IMPLEMENTATION IN RELATION TO PERFORMANCE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
1.
INTRODUCTION
Over the last two decades, firms globally are facing increasing pressures to attain and sustain their competitive position and performance. To survive in in today’s dynamic and competitive markets, firms need to come up with strategies consistent with its environmental demands for efficiency, effectiveness and customer responsiveness. In view of the escalating threats from global players, especially those from China, Malaysian manufacturing firms are compelled to continuously review their strategies and devise plans to improve their operations if they were to survive and prosper. Currently, products from China have flooded the Malaysian market at very competitive prices and for the Malaysian manufacturers to counter the impending threats successfully; they need to be more efficient in their operations so that their manufacturing performance could be improved. One of the strategies to improve manufacturing performance is adoption of worldclass, lean and integrated manufacturing strategies such as just-in-time (JIT) system (Fullerton & McWatters, 2002). Some of the benefits of JIT would allow companies to
References: Ansari, A. and Modarress, B., (1990), Just-In-Time Purchasing, The Free Press, NY. Foster, G. and Hongren, C.T., (1987), “JIT: cost accounting and management issues”, Management Accounting, (June) 19-25. Johnson, H.T. and Bröms, A. (2000), Profit Beyond Measure, The Free Press: New York. Nakamura, M., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R., (1998), “Adoption of just-in-time manufacturing methods at US- and Japanese-owned plants: some empirical evidence”, IEEE Transactiobs on Engineering Management, Vol. 45, 230-240. Mia, L. and Clarke, B. (1999). Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance. Management Accounting Research. 10, 137 – 158. Khandwalla, P.N. (1972). The effect of different types competition on the use of management controls. Journal of Accounting Research,10, 275-285. Khandwalla, P.N. (1977). The Design of Organizations, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanivich. Govindarajan, V. (1988). A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 828-853. Govindarajan, V. and Fisher, J. (1990). Strategy, control system, and resource sharing: effects on business unit performance, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 259-285. Chenhall, R.H. and Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: An Australian study. Management Accounting Research, 9, 1–19. Kaplan, R.S. (1984). The evolution of management accounting. The Accounting Review, July, 390-418. Cooper, R., (1995), “JIT: cost accounting and cost management issues”, Management Accounting, Vol. 6, 19-25. Balakrishnan, R.Linsmeier, T.J., Venkatachalam, M. (1996), “Financial benefits from JIT adoption: effects of customer concentration and cost structure”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 183-205. Cobb, I., (1993), JIT and the Management Accountant: A Study of Current UK Practice, CIMA, London. Fullerton, R.R. and McWatters, C.S., (2002), “The role of performance measures and incentive systems in relation to the degree of JIT implementation”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27, 711-735. 18 Fullerton, R.R., McWatters, C.S. and Fawson, C., (2003), “An examination of the relationships between JIT and financial performance”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21, 383-404. Huson, M. and Nanda, D., (1995), “The impact of just-in-time manufacturing on firm performance in the US”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 12, 297-310. Inman, R.A., and Mehra, S., (1993), “Financial justifications of JIT implementation”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 32-39. Johnson, H.T. and Kaplan, R.S., (1989), Management by accounting is not management accounting”, The Accounting Systems Journal, Fall, 14-17. Kinney, M.R. and Wempe, W.F., (2002), “Further evidence on the extent and origin of JIT’s proftability effects”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 203-225. Ptak, C., (1987), MRP and Beyond: A toolbox for Integrating People and Systems, Irwin, Chicago, IL. Ramsay, J and William, T., (1990), “Sourcing/contracting strategy selection”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 10, No.8, 1928. Shannon, P., (1993), “Push/pull manufacturing simulation: a hands-on training experience”. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1st Quarter, 13-17. Stevenson, W.J., (1996), Production/Operations Management, Irwin, Chicago, IL. 19