Preview

Systems and Operations Management Mercedes Benz

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Systems and Operations Management Mercedes Benz
Systems and Operations Management
Mercedes Benz
Analysis of the competitiveness of operations management

Abhijeet Ghosh, A4060514, MBA Intake 14 (Group B)
London School of Business and Finance

Table of Content

Executive Summary & Introduction 3
Product and Services 3
Task 1: Operations Management 4
Operations Strategy 4
Process Design 4
Body Shop 5
Paint Shop 6
Assembly 7
Just in Time 8
Quality Management 8
Innovation and Improvement 9
Supply Chain Management 10
Task 2: Integration of Information system 12
Business Integration Server 13
Task 3: Job Design 14
Lean Manufacturing 14
Conclusion 15
Appendix 16
Reference 18

Executive Summary and Introduction
Mercedes-Benz is a division of the German manufacturer Daimler AG, and the brand is used for automobiles, buses, coaches, and trucks. Mercedes-Benz is headquartered in Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. The name first appeared in 1926 under Daimler-Benz but traces its origins to Daimler's 1901 Mercedes and to Karl Benz's 1886 Benz Patent Motor-wagen, widely regarded as the first automobile.
Part of Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA) is responsible for the distribution and marketing of Mercedes-Benz, May Bach, smart, and Sprinter products in the United States. In 2011, the company sold 264,460 passenger vehicles in the US, representing 17.5% year-over-year growth, in addition to 16,577 Sprinters.
Although MBUSA was founded in 1965, importation of Mercedes-Benz vehicles actually began in 1952 under Max Hoffman. Mr. Hoffman was a driving force behind the car that cemented the identity of Mercedes-Benz in America: the iconic 300SL Gullwing.
By 1957, Mercedes-Benz was in a position to expand its reach in the United States and entered into a distribution agreement with Studebaker-Packard Corporation. Eight years later, the company struck out on its own, forming Mercedes-Benz USA. (Mercedes-Benz USA 2013)
Products and Services
The main products manufactured in Mercedes-Benz,



References: Abdi, F., Shavarini, S., & Hoseini, S. (2006). Glean lean: How to use lean approach in services industries. Journal of Services Research, 6, 191–206. Adler, P. S. (1990). Shared learning. Management Science, 36, 938–957. Adler, P. S., & Cole, R. E. (1993). Designed for learning: A tale of 2 auto plants. Sloan Management Review, 34, 85–94. Ahls, B. (2001). Advanced memory and lean change. IIE Solutions, 33, 40–42. Al-Ahmadi.H, (2009), ‘Factors Affecting Performance of Hospital Nurses in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia’, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp.40-54. Alavi, S. (2003). Leaning the right way. Manufacturing Engineer, 82, 32–35. Anderson-Connolly, R., Grunberg, L., Greenberg, E. S., & Moore, S. (2002). Is lean mean?: Workplace transformation and employee well-being. Work, Employment & Society, 16, 389–413. Aswathappa.K, (2006), ‘Job Analysis and Job Design’, Human Resource and Personal Management, 4th Edition, pp.93-125, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands–resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104. Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274–284. Bakker, A. B., van Emmerik, H., & van Riet, P. (2008). How job demands, resources, and burnout predict objective performance: A constructive replication. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 21, 309–324. Bakker, A. B., van Veldhoven, M., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2010). Beyond the demand- control model thriving on high job demands and resources. Brown, C. B., Collins, T. R., & McCombs, E. L. (2006). Transformation from batch to lean manufacturing: The performance issues. Engineering Management Journal, 18, 3–13. Bruno, R., & Jordan, L. (2002). Lean production and the discourse of dissent. Working USA, 6, 108–134. Campion, M. A. (1988). Interdisciplinary approaches to job design: A constructive replication with extensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 467–481. Campion, M. A., & McClelland, C. L. (1991). Inter- disciplinary examination of the costs and benefits of enlarged jobs: A job design quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 186–198. Campion, M. A., Mumford, T. V., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Work redesign: Obstacles and opportunities. Human Resource Management, 44, 367–390. Cappelli, P., & Rogovsky, N. (1994). New work systems and skill requirements. International Labor Review, 133, 205–220. Conti, R., Angelis, J., Cooper, C., Faragher, B., & Gill, C. (2006). The effects of lean production on worker job stress. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 1013–1038. Conti, R., & Gill, C. (1998). Hypothesis creation and modeling in job stress studies: The effects of just-in-time and lean production. International Journal of Employment Studies, 6, 149–173. Conti, R., & Warner, M. (1997). Technology, culture and craft: Job tasks and quality realities. New Technology Work and Employment, 12, 123–135. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848. Cua, K. O., McKone, K. E., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 675–694. Delbridge, R., & Lowe, J. (2002). Workplace relations and the new shop floor: Introduction. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36, 161–162. Delbridge, R., Lowe, J., & Oliver, N. (2000). Shop- floor responsibilities under lean team working. Human Relations, 53, 1459–1479. Delbridge, R., & Turnbull, P. (1992). Human resource maximization: The management of labour under a just-in-time manufacturing sys- tem. In P. Blyton & P. Turnbull (Eds.), Reassessing human resource management (pp. 56–73). London, UK: Sage. Delbridge, R., Turnbull, P., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). Pushing back the frontiers: Management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM regimes. New Technology Work and Employment, 7, 97–106. de Menezes, L. M., Wood, S., & Gelade, G. (2010). The integration of human resource and operation management practices and its link with performance: A longitudinal latent class study. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 455–471. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands– resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006). Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 99–123. Edwards, J. R., Scully, J. A., & Brtek, M. D. (1999). The measurement of work: Hierarchical representation of the multi-method job design questionnaire. Personnel Psychology, 52, 305–334. Fried, Y., Grant, A. M., Levi, A. S., Hadani, M., & Slowik, L. H. (2007). Job design in temporal con- text: A career dynamics perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 911–927. Fullerton, R. R., McWatters, C. S., & Fawson, C. (2003). An examination of the relationships between JIT and financial performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 383–404. Fullerton, R. R., & Wempe, W. F. (2009). Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 29, 214–240. Garg.P & Rastogi.R, (2006), ‘New Model of Job Design: Motivating Employees’ Performance’, Journal of Management Development, Vol 25 no 6, pp.572-587. Graham, L. (1995). On the line at SubaruIzuzu: The Japanese model. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press. Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., Parker, S. K., & Frese, M. (2010). Putting job design in context: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 145–157. Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317–375. Greller, M. M., & Herold, D. M. (1975). Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 244–256. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279. Hakanen, J. (2009). Do engaged employees perform better at work? The motivating power of job resources and work engagement on future job performance. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers. Hakanen, J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands–resources model to predict engagement: Analysing a conceptual model. In A. Bakker & M. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 85–101). Ivancevich.J.M,(1998), ‘job analysis and job design’, Human Resource Management,7th edition, pp.168-195,Irwin McGraw-HILL. Jackson, P. R., & Mullarkey, S. (2000). Lean production teams and health in garment manufacture. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 231–245. Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Martin, R., & Davids, K. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 753–762. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408. Kahya.E, (2007), ‘The Effect of Job characteristics and working conditions on job performance’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, PP(515-523). Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308. Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work. New York, NY: Basic Books. Ketchen, D. J., Combs, J. G., Russel, C. J., Shook, C, Dean, M. A., Runge, J. . . . Lamoureux, S. (1997). Organizational configurations and perfor- mance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 223–240. Kollberg, B., Dahlgaard, J. J., & Brehmer, P. (2006). Measuring lean initiatives in health care services: Issues and findings. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56, Landsbergis, P. A., Cahill, J., & Schnall, P. (1999). Lewchuk, W., Stewart, P., & Yates, C. (2001). Quality of working life in the automobile industry: A Canada–UK comparative study. New Technology Work and Employment, 16, 72–87. MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197–221. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149–171. Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2002). Minimizing tradeoffs when redesigning work: Evidence from a longitudinal quasi-experiment. Personnel Psychology, 55, 589–612. Morgeson, F. P., Dierdorff, E. C., & Hmurovic, J. L. (2010). Work design in situ: Understanding the role of occupational and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 351–360. Mathis.R.L and Jackson.J.H,(2003), ‘Individual Performance and Retention’, Human Resource Management, 10th Edition, pp.66-99, Thomson Publication. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2008). Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 27, pp. 39–92). Brighton, UK: Emerald. Mullarkey, S., Jackson, P. R., & Parker, S. K. (1995). Employee reactions to JIT manufacturing practices: A two-phase investigation. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15, 62–79. Niepce, W., & Molleman, E. (1998). Work design issues in lean production from a sociotechnical systems perspective: Neo-Taylorism or the next step in sociotechnical design? Human Relations, 51, 259–288. Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463–479. Oliver, N., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). The Japanization of British industry. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Parker, M., & Slaughter, J. (1988). Management by stress. Technology Review, 9, 37–44. Parker, S. K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 447–469. Parker, S. K. (2003). Longitudinal effects of lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 620–634. Parker, S. K., & Wall, T. D. (1998). Job and work design: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Sage. Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 74, 413–440. Perry.J.L, Mesch.D and Paarlberg.L, (2006), ‘Motivating Employees in a New Governance Era: The Performance Paradigm Revisited’, The Premier Journal of Public Administration, Vol 66, pp.4. Pruijt, H. (2003). Teams between neo-Taylorism and anti-Taylorism. Economic and Industrial Democ- racy, 24, 77–101. Rinehart, C., Huxley, C., & Robertson, D. (1997). Just another car factory? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–13. Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engage- ment to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227. Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross- national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 116–131. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 293–315. Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology-an International Review, 57, 173–203. Schonberger, R. J. (1982). Production workers bear major quality responsibility in Japanese industry. Industrial Engineering, 14, 34–40. Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 129–149. Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 785–805. Spear, S., & Bowen, H. K. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review, 77, 97–106. Sprigg, C. A., & Jackson, P. R. (2006). Call centers as lean service environments: Job-related strain and the mediating role of work design. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 197–212. Staats, B. R., Brunner, D. J., & Upton, D. M. (2011). Lean principles, learning, and knowledge work: Evidence from a software services provider. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 376–390. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘‘interpretive’’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful