The Rise Of Nature Vs. Nurture Debate
Carl Jung once said, “I am not what has happened to me. I am what I choose to become.” The “Nature vs. Nurture” debate has been in question for a long time. Many have wondered what drives one’s behavior. While psychologists have developed many theories to suggest the higher influence, society hasn’t come to an agreement on the matter. The history of the rising of the nature vs. nurture debate, studies done due to this controversy, and evil beings in history significantly show that nurture overpowers the effects of nature. Some people believe that genes determine behavior while others think environment does, and while some disagree, nurturing and caring for an individual affects them more.
To understand the objective of the debate, one must …show more content…
“It is a fact that we have traits that are predetermined by our genes, but we can still choose who we want to be as we travel through our lifetime”(“Nature vs. Nurture Debate”). Even the cruelest people in history demonstrate that being evil isn’t born, it is developed. They had to have been surrounded by extreme environments to believe that the way they were acting was the right choice to make in life. Many like to acknowledge Adolf Hitler in this situation. Famous for initiating World War II, he is considered to be very vile and wicked. However, even though some might believe that he was destined to be villainous, he was not born this …show more content…
Nurture” issue seems to be very unlikely to happen in the near future. There will always be different opinions as to which is the higher influence in one’s demeanor. Numerous people like to look at the science of it all and say that genes tell us who we are, and nothing can change that. Using this research, they then choose to come to the conclusion that nature is the higher influence in this situation. However, the real answer comes from looking at the facts and studies. Throughout life, people choose who they are and who they want to be. The meaning behind the nature vs. nurture argument, along with studies and stories of evil figures indicate that nurture is the higher authority. Many feel that genes predetermine your successes and who you grow up to be. However, the way one is nurtured and brought up is much more impacting on their
To understand the objective of the debate, one must …show more content…
“It is a fact that we have traits that are predetermined by our genes, but we can still choose who we want to be as we travel through our lifetime”(“Nature vs. Nurture Debate”). Even the cruelest people in history demonstrate that being evil isn’t born, it is developed. They had to have been surrounded by extreme environments to believe that the way they were acting was the right choice to make in life. Many like to acknowledge Adolf Hitler in this situation. Famous for initiating World War II, he is considered to be very vile and wicked. However, even though some might believe that he was destined to be villainous, he was not born this …show more content…
Nurture” issue seems to be very unlikely to happen in the near future. There will always be different opinions as to which is the higher influence in one’s demeanor. Numerous people like to look at the science of it all and say that genes tell us who we are, and nothing can change that. Using this research, they then choose to come to the conclusion that nature is the higher influence in this situation. However, the real answer comes from looking at the facts and studies. Throughout life, people choose who they are and who they want to be. The meaning behind the nature vs. nurture argument, along with studies and stories of evil figures indicate that nurture is the higher authority. Many feel that genes predetermine your successes and who you grow up to be. However, the way one is nurtured and brought up is much more impacting on their