The Relationship Between Leadership and Personality
The Relationship
Between Leadership and Personality
Andrew J. Marsiglia, PhD, CCP
People that have task-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on details. They are not comfortable initiating an action-plan until they are satisfied they have all the necessary facts. On the other hand, people who have relations-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on the result and are comfortable initiating an action plan when they have just the essential facts.
Therefore, it is important for a leader to understand personality and accurately adjust leadership style to the management situation.
www.lead-inspire.com
August 2005
The Relationship between leadership and Personality
Andrew J. Marsiglia, PhD, CCP
August 2005
People who have task-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on details.
They are not comfortable initiating an action-plan until they are satisfied they have all the necessary facts. On the other hand, people who have relations-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on the result and are comfortable initiating an action-plan when they have just the essential facts (Blake & Mouton, 1982). Therefore, it is important for a leader to understand personality and accurately adjust leadership style to the management situation. Bass
(1990) states,
Personality theorists tended to regard leadership as a one-way effect: Leaders possess qualities that differentiate them from followers. But these theorists did not acknowledge the extent to which leaders and followers have interactive effects by determining which qualities of followers are of consequence in a situation. (p. 12)
Personality predicted leadership emergence across a variety of people and settings. Lord (1986) states, “In short, personality traits are associated with leadership emergence to a higher degree and more consistently than popular literature indicates” (p. 407). In addition, Barrick and Mount
Between Leadership and Personality
Andrew J. Marsiglia, PhD, CCP
People that have task-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on details. They are not comfortable initiating an action-plan until they are satisfied they have all the necessary facts. On the other hand, people who have relations-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on the result and are comfortable initiating an action plan when they have just the essential facts.
Therefore, it is important for a leader to understand personality and accurately adjust leadership style to the management situation.
www.lead-inspire.com
August 2005
The Relationship between leadership and Personality
Andrew J. Marsiglia, PhD, CCP
August 2005
People who have task-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on details.
They are not comfortable initiating an action-plan until they are satisfied they have all the necessary facts. On the other hand, people who have relations-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on the result and are comfortable initiating an action-plan when they have just the essential facts (Blake & Mouton, 1982). Therefore, it is important for a leader to understand personality and accurately adjust leadership style to the management situation. Bass
(1990) states,
Personality theorists tended to regard leadership as a one-way effect: Leaders possess qualities that differentiate them from followers. But these theorists did not acknowledge the extent to which leaders and followers have interactive effects by determining which qualities of followers are of consequence in a situation. (p. 12)
Personality predicted leadership emergence across a variety of people and settings. Lord (1986) states, “In short, personality traits are associated with leadership emergence to a higher degree and more consistently than popular literature indicates” (p. 407). In addition, Barrick and Mount
References: Aczel, A. D. (1996). Complete Business Statistics (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and organization. New York: Harper. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the Big-Five personality dimensions and job performance Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland 's occupational types Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill 's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.) Behling, O., & Rauch, C. F. J. (1985). A functional perspective on improving leadership effectiveness Bernardin, J. H., & Alvares, K. M. (1976). The managerial grid as a predictor of conflict resolution method and managerial effectiveness Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. (1966). Managerial Facades. Advanced Management Journal, 31(3), 30-33. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. (1982). A comparative analysis of situationalism and 9,9 management by principle Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. (1985). The managerial grid III: The key to leadership excellence. Blake, R. R., Mouton, J., Sloma, R. L., & Loftin, B. P. (1968). A second breakthrough in organization development Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1976). When scholarship fails, research falters: A reply to Bernardin and Alvares Blake, R. R., Mouton, J. S., Barnes, L. B., & Greiner, L. E. (1964). Breakthrough in Organization Development Blanchard, K. (2001a). Situational leadership and situational leadership II: Comparing the two models (White Paper) Blanchard, K. (2001b). Situational leadership II: Developing competence, gaining commitment, retaining talent (Company Report 13526) Blanchard, K. H., & Hersey, P. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Life-cycle theory of leadership. Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, S. (1985). Leadership and the one-minute manager: Increasing effectiveness through situational leadership Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Bryman, A., & Stephens, M. (1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership Chan, K. Y., & Drasgow, F. (2001). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: understanding the motivation to lead Chemers, M. (1997). An integrated theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chemers, M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 4(1), 27-43. (2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. Cowley, W. H. (1928). Three distinctions in the study of leaders. In B. M. Bass (Ed.), Bass & Stogdill 's handbook of leadership: Theory, research & Managerial applications (3 ed., pp. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research Day, D. R., & Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: A comparative study Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior Dhar, U., & Mishra, P. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: A study of constituent factors. Journal of Management Research, 1(4), 254-266. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the big-five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246-1256. Farren, C., & Kaye, B. (1996). New skills for new leadership roles. In F. Hesselbein & J. Fernandez, C. F., & Vecchio, R. P. (1997). Situational leadership theory revisited: A test of an across-jobs perspective Fiedler, F. E. (1967). Theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fiedler, F. E. (1971). Personality and situational determinants of leader behavior (Technical Report) Fiedler, F. E. (1976). The leadership game: Matching the man to the situation. Organizational Dynamics, 4(3), 6-16. Fiedler, F. E. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 4(1), 27-43. Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). Improving leadership effectiveness: Cognitive resources and organizational performance Fielder, F. E. (1998). The leadership situation: A missing factor in selecting and training managers Forum, P. o. t. t. C. I. E. (2004). Proceedings of the third Construction Industry Executive Forum (Report) Furnham, A. (2001). Vocational preference and P-O fit: Reflections on Holland 's theory of vocational choice George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behaivior in groups. Journal of Applied