Preview

The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Qualities Of A Prince Rhetorical Analysis
Aristotle’s Rhetorical Appeals Aristotle came up with a persuasive pattern we see in media all over called, rhetorical appeals. Ethos, logos, and pathos are seen in various types of media, ads, magazines, and many more. In “The Qualities of a Prince” an excerpt by Niccolò Machiavelli, he informs us about how a prince is able to hold his title and position and how to maintain the power that he has over the people. He uses past experiences for examples on how to maintain power. In Capitalism: A Love Story by Michael Moore, he tries to incorporate the rhetorical appeals into his argument about power. In order to use these appeals he shows how the government has abused capitalism and gains the viewers trust by using persuasive patterns. Each …show more content…
Ethos being the first of the three rhetorical appeals is very important when trying to maintain your audience’s interest. Machiavelli does a great job of persuading his audience with the ethos appeal. An example Machiavelli uses to persuade his audience with ethos is found in “The Qualities of a Prince”, “If we examine this carefully, we shall see that he was more merciful than the Florentine people, who in order to avoid being considered cruel, allowed the destruction of Pistoia” (Machiavelli, 43). Ethos is presented here by showing an example from past history on how someone in power had messed up by being too merciful than the Florentine people. By using these examples Machiavelli uses ethos to show the past history and he is able to gain the trust from his audience because of the knowledge he demonstrates on different instances that have happened in other ruler’s pasts. Michael Moore is able to appeal to his audience by using ethos as well as …show more content…
This appeal draws the audience in with emotion and makes the audience feel empathy and sympathy for the issue. Machiavelli is able to get through to his audience using pathos by bringing up the issues of whether or not it is better to be loved or feared as well as despised and hated. These two examples and the way Machiavelli writes about them gives the audience a chance to think about what they would want if they were trying to be a ruler; also what they would want as a citizen (Machiavelli). By reaching out to his audience Machiavelli is able to emotionally persuade people that it is best for a ruler to chose whether he wants to be loved by his people so he can stay in power. The other idea Machiavelli brings up is to be feared in order to gain respect and to make sure that no one tries to overrule. In the film by Michael Moore the way he uses pathos is a different way than Machiavelli. Instead of giving the audience a chance to think about what they would want Moore shows horrible things that have happened to people because of capitalism. This includes the people in the beginning of the film who are being evicted from their homes that they have grown up in and have always lived in (Capitalism: A Love Story). While using pathos he also manages to slip in ethos by showing that two different people in opposite situations are going through the same thing because of capitalism. Moore shows the person in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff’s. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff evaluate the Neo-Aristotelian style by stating, “The importance of this principle can scarcely be exaggerated; without it, modern speech criticism would not have been possible.”(464) They go on to explain that without this style speechmaking wouldn’t be as exceptional today and would be much like ancient rhetoric. They say, “The problem in the traditional system appears to be an omission rather than an inherent defect the genre and remain consistent with Aristotelian principles. Finding Rosenthal’s analysis of ethos suggestive, we approached the campaign oration as an instance of “personal persuasion.”(464) Where the crowd and audience act more or less like a judge of future events similar to that of an election. The speaker must be prepared to embrace the crowd while giving their speech. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff compare a variety of speech analyzation styles throughout their article however coming to an ultimate conclusion of the ability to critique comes strictly from the critic…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effect of Eighner’s attention to language in the first five paragraphs shows the audience how knowledgeable he is. Most people have the common idea that homeless people have a high illiteracy or a lack of education, but Eighner is different from most homeless people. Eighner states that he, “wrote the Merriam-Webster research service to discover what [he] could about the word “Dumpster.” [He] learned from then that “Dumpster is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempster Dumpster company” (Eighner 107). His familiarity with this information establishes ethos. Throughout these five paragraphs it is revealing Eighner’s character as someone who is drawn well to his intellect and it stabilizes his credibility as a character.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the tragic novel Into the Wild, author Jon Krakauer provides an in depth analysis of the life and lonely death of Christopher McCandless. McCandless was a young man straight out of college, looking to find himself while hitchhiking alone in the bush of Alaska. Unfortunately for Chris his well anticipated venture turned fatal after a hundred some days alone in the wilderness. Jon Krakauer uses rhetorical methods for the duration of the book, which allows him to speak of Chris’s life with a sense of certainty. The reader thus trusts Krakauer’s narrative and somewhat understands why a man like Chris could head into unknown territory without a second thought. The author shows his qualification for writing about Chris by making comparisons with his own life and interviewing those close to Chris…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethos is basing arguments based on one's character through trust. The three main elements of ethos is trustworthiness/credibility, authority, and clear motives. An example would be turning to a dactor's help and advice because of their knowledge of health and medicine. People will turn to doctors because they know that doctors have experiences in the health and medical field. They would much rather listen to a doctor than a random people they do not trust. One may use this rhetorical appeal in a persuasive essay because the information given is true statements that come from experienced people or credibility. In a persuasive essay, one can give the true statements instead of giving their views and opinions. This kind of information will make…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical analysis attempts to show how the author of a piece uses persuasion. The piece may play on the emotions to persuade, may use logic, or it may rely on the audience’s ethics. Sometimes a combination of these may be used. The rhetorical analysis essay examines the methods used and their effectiveness.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethos is the ethical appeal of the speaker or author. It is used to make the speaker seem more credible or humble. An example of this in Henry’s speech is seen in the quote, “No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house” (Henry 187). By beginning his address this way, Henry makes himself seem respectful and gains the trust of the audience. However, Franklin uses ethos more often and more effectively. Franklin’s use of ethos is evident in the quote, “Sir, I am not sure I shall never approve of it; for, having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change my opinions even on important subjects, which I once thought right, but now found to be otherwise” (Franklin 191). In the quote, Franklin is saying that although he does not fully believe in the current condition of the Constitution, he is realizing that as he grows older, his opinions are changing and he is seeing that he is not always correct. This is a well executed example of ethos because by admitting that he is not always right, Franklin makes himself seem more human and less…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In South Central, Los Angeles, there is a food epidemic taking place among the population. For miles and miles, the only easily attainable food source is fast food; causing the overconsumption of un-nutritious, greasy, and fattening food. This is the problem brought to the public’s attention by speaker Ron Finley in his Ted Talks speech, “A Guerilla Gardener in South Central L.A.” Finley explains how everywhere he looks in his native South Central, all he sees are fast food chains and Dialysis clinics opened due to the lack of nutritious food. Finley views the lack of a healthy food source as a serious problem, and brings up his point; there are miles of vacant lots throughout Los Angeles, all of which could be used for the cultivation of healthy fruits and vegetables to better the urban community’s diet and health.…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the rhetorical strategy of narration is both seen differently in the article, “Unnatural Killers”, by John Grisham and the article, “The Case Against College Athletic Recruiting” by Ben Adler. Both appeal emotionally to the reader but one is a lot more logical in its approach then the other.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article, “Miss G: A Case Of Internet Addiction,” New York Times writer Virginia Heffernan addresses the issue of Internet addiction. Heffernan’s purpose is to inform her readers that an Internet addiction might not apply to those who use the Internet for good. She uses authoritative figures and proves her research. She adopts an objective tone in order to prove to Internet users that Internet addiction is not always the case.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prejudice is an issue that has been around for hundreds of years. It has become a part of natural human behavior. Two sides divide prejudice at the present: one fighting to eradicate prejudice and the other in defending it and claiming it can be socially productive. Most people choose the side of eradicating prejudice from society, but Jonathan Rauch has chosen the side with less support. In his article, In Defense of Prejudice: Why Incendiary Speech Must Be Protected, he supports the intellectual pluralism opinion of how to make best of prejudice and rejects the purism view of trying to eradicate prejudice by using the rhetorical techniques of ethos, logos, and pathos rhetoric. Rauch explains that intellectual pluralism is the idea that society can make the best of prejudice if intellectual freedom, the progress of knowledge, the advancement of science, and all those good things are the goals of society. Purism is the antipluralsitic idea that “society cannot be just until the last trace of invidious prejudice is scrubbed away” (Rauch 3). Throughout the article, Rauch gets his thoughts across to the reader clearly by using rhetoric to capture his readers.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical analysis

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Beverly Gross’s "Bitch" first appeared in the Salmagundi, a humanities and social sciences-based magazine in 1994. In this essay Gross mainly discussed about the meaning of the word “Bitch” changed across time. She analyzed the word in different perceptive, its offensive meaning, its contemptuous meaning and its literal meaning. As the meaning of the word “Bitch” is changing over time, it actually represents the women’s roles in the society is changing as well. Gross illustrates the word “Bitch” as a demeaning word, she claimed, “A word used by men who are threatened by women”. (Beverly Gross, P.628) It shows that men are willing to be the dominant of the society, and the word “bitch” is an ultimate weapon men have to humiliate women. Anecdotes, contrast and comparison are techniques Gross used to create a strong, powerful and persuasive essay.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reading the books of Machiavelli’s: The Prince and The Discourses I noticed there are many similarities to one another. Machiavelli explains the concept of an ideal ruler that he thinks would be able to govern with great power and adversity from his observation of previous rulers. The Prince is a book written about Tyrants while The Discourses is a book written by lovers of liberty (The Prince, Introduction- pg XXIII).…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics