Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Radioactive Waste

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
821 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Radioactive Waste
Radioactive waste is the material that nuclear fuel becomes after it's used, thus, creating radioactive waste. Most is Uranium, containing around 90%. Meaning it is still usable fuel. Used nuclear fuel is extremely hot and radioactive. It is usually handled by storing it under water with a dense material such as concrete or steel. The waste ranges from low to high-level, High-level wastes are cooled and shielded while the low-level waste is handled easily with minimum protection. It is unsure on what to do with it in the aftermath. The nuclear power industry has used the ocean as a dump site before. Facilities are built to control the waste but have a problem storing all of it away. Radioactive leftovers have piled up for decades and it is clear that it is a problem that has to be taken care of. Nuclear power plants can generate electricity simply by splitting uranium that produce heat. After a couple of years, uranium is considered used, or “waste” and is replaced by new fuel. However, if the waste is stored and recycled over time, it can be used to generate electricity. All of this can benefit everyone in the United-States in many ways. A major obstacle to nuclear waste recycling is that it's not cost-effective. Around 12% of the world's electricity is generated by …show more content…
There are ideas burying it deep within Yucca Mountain but, it is not a permanent solution. There will have to be a decision made and action has to be taken. The government has already spent billions building a kind of reverse mine, a shaft into the side of the mountain. It is in stainless steel to bury the waste. To fully complete the repository would cost around $80 billion total, this is according to Bush administration estimate. Nuclear waste can be used many ways in the end. Countries around the world use it to their own benefit such as electricity through a process called

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Yucca Mountain

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The amount of nuclear waste produced every year is too much to deal with but there has to be a way to store it. Most countries store their waste in insoluble glasses and put them in stainless steel containers and place them deep underground in a stable rock structure away from…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We should store nuclear waste in the mountain because there are nobody living near Yucca Mountain,so nobody can’t be affect to the nuclear waste. There is not a lot of rainfall near Yucca mountain,so that mean that the water can’t interact with the nuclear waste. Also there was only one tremendous earthquake and that was about 50,000 years ago. Then, there is 1% that a tremendous earthquake could happen. But,that will never happen. Additionally to my decision is we could stop earthquake by to absorb contaminants.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yucca Mountain Case Study

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Safe and permanent disposal of highly radioactive wastes in the United States has been sought after since radioactive materials first came about. In 1982, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) created a procedure for establishing a lasting, underground repository for high-level radioactive waste. Congress assigned responsibility to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to site, construct, operate, and close a repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Ten sites were chosen by DOE for potential consideration and in 1987, Yucca Mountain in Nye County, Nevada was selected as the lone site to be studied.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard A. Muller, an awardee of the MacArthur Fellowship and physics professor at UC Berkley, states in his 2008 essay “Nuclear Waste”, that Americans and the rest of the world are overly concerned with radioactive debris and the possibility of nuclear contamination. Muller first brings to light the most common fears of storing nuclear waste; volcanic activity in the Yucca Mountains, the area where the waste is stored, and the possibility of radioactive particles contaminating the water supply. Muller then goes on to entertain opposing viewpoints on how the waste should be disposed of. Muller then goes on to support his own claim by providing statistical data and explanations of radioactive…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the imminent license renewal of the majority of US nuclear power plants and the insistence of the Bush administration to build additional plants, the need for long-term storage of nuclear waste is greater than ever. Current estimates have the nation's 103 nuclear reactors producing 84,000 metric tons of waste by 2035 (Hansen, 2001). With the current containers either close to or completely filled, the Department of Energy has chosen the Yucca Mountains as the permanent repository for nuclear waste. A seemingly ideal location, Yucca Mountain is 100 miles outside of Las Vegas, with the nearest humans 15 miles away (Hansen, 2001). However, many environmentalists and Nevada residents have grave reservations about putting the permanent storage at Yucca Mountain, citing concerns such as waste transportation dangers, geological instability, and the inability of the site to store all of the United States waste. They feel this is a hasty decision that is political in nature (Hansen, 2001). While the storage of nuclear waste is not an ideal situation, America's current reliance on nuclear power makes it a necessity. The Yucca Mountain repository is currently the best option for long-term storage because of its relative isolation from human settlements, natural geological features, and its large storage capacity.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Concentrates hazardous ash for burial o Sale of energy can reduce cost • Cons o Expensive to build o Produces hazardous/toxic ash (lead, cadmium, mercury, dioxins) o Emits air pollution (dioxin, mercury, CO2) o Does not encourage waste reduction • Waste reduction: produce much less waste and pollution and the potential wastes we do create can be reused, recycled and/or composted. o Not “trash cans” but “resource containers” Recycling • Recycle: separate and recycle paper, glass, cans, plastic, metal and other items and buy products from recycled materials o US: 34% of MSW is recycled and 8% is composted • So, 54% landfill (decreasing), 13% incinerator (decreasing), 25% recycled (increasing) and 8% composted (increasing) • Two types of recycling: • • Closed-­‐loop recycling: recycling post-­‐consumer waste into same product it came from (aluminum cans into more aluminum cans) Open-­‐loop recycling: recycling waste into different product (office paper into toilet paper or plastic bottles into fleece jackets) Reduce: consume less and live a simpler lifestyle Reuse: Rely more on items that can be used repeatedly instead of throwaway items, and buy necessary items secondhand, and borrow or rent them.…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, nuclear reaction can generate radioactive waste. These wastes are very dangerous, and have very high radiation. Moreover, radioactive waste is hard to recycle and store. Radioactive waste are usually buried in the deep ground or seabed. Not only such, these wastes are hard to degrade. For example, uranium-235 needs 7 hundred million years to degrade.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prions Research Papers

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are multiple benefits that come from this application. It reduces our climate impact, the U.S. EPA has estimated that about 42% of all the greenhouse gas emissions are caused by the production and use of goods, including food, products and packaging. Reducing, reusing and recycling will conserve that energy and can drastically reduce our carbon emissions. It also conserves resources and minimizes pollution. Extracting raw materials from natural spaces requires huge amounts of energy, and causes pollution, whether it is logging a forest, mining for minerals or drilling for oil in the bay. Processing these materials requires more energy, and causes more pollution. Once they’re used, the goods are simply dumped in a landfill or destroyed in an incinerator. Which only makes the matters worse because incinerators let out toxic fumes that only go straight into the atmosphere, and will only continue to add to the ever-growing amount of carbon dioxide emissions. Dumping everything in a landfill sounds like wonderful idea, but that requires acres of land that must be cleared out for said trash. All of the habitats, and trees will be replaced with a landfill that will only collect garbage instead of life. Juxtapose to the zero waste approach which conserves natural resources and reduces the pollution from extraction, disposal, and manufacturing…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This powerful energy was found by William Rontgen in 1895. The energy released by the nucleus is used in the production of nuclear reactors which perform variety of functions. The nuclear reactors are used to boil water at a very high temperature within a specified period of time to use for industrial and production purposes. That water is also used to activate the turbine that is present in the shaft of a generator. The nuclear energy is powerful because helps in production of heat and electricity is larger quantities. It is a form of energy that does not directly create air pollution like combustion of coal or release of petroleum products produces. Nuclear energy is a source of power and may be used in the future as a means of substitute because it is free from pollution. There are many advantages of nuclear energies which the other form of energies cannot provide. Although it releases energy it does not inject any harmful gases like carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide , carbon monoxide etc that is hazardous to environment. It does not constitute in the rise of global warming which the other form of energies do. When nuclear energy is being produced many area of the land is not occupied. Many natural resources are not exploited while producing the power. The energy is released by radiation does not specifically cause any harm to the environment and living creatures…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of radioactive waste is still an unsolved one. The waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerous and it has to be carefully looked after for several thousand years (10'000 years according to United States Environmental Protection Agency standards).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckiibben Waste

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays