Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Good Samaritan Laws

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
462 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Good Samaritan Laws
The article from Newsweek, A Doctors Dilemma, describes a story which indicates a very clear sign of how we as a society, have become aware of the possible negative outcomes from being a good Samaritan and helping others in need. “Good Samaritan laws generally provide basic legal protection for those who assist a person who is injured or in danger. In essence, these laws protect the “Good Samaritan” from liability if unintended consequences result from their assistance” (Morris). The majority of people want to help others, however in this day and age we must first look at the situation from a legal standpoint and know what the law is in the state a person resides in, when contemplating performing a good Samaritan act. This is evident from the young doctor’s hesitancy to help the victim in the story whom he knew was in dire need of medical attention. In the Newsweek article, the doctor immediately thought to help the man who had sustained life threatening injuries at the scene of an automobile accident. The doctor knew if he did not help the victim right away he would probably die before any medical help arrived. Not only did he consider the possibility of being sued, he also knew that if he transported the man who sustained life threatening injuries, he could cause more trauma …show more content…
We are left to assume the laws in this state did not consider the doctor a typical Samaritan, because since the accident and after speaking with one of his professors, the doctor decided that he would just “drive on” anytime there was an emergency situation that wasn’t in the hospital (Dillard). This was disheartening to say the least, but it was not a surprise. It is sad when a doctor cannot risk his career to provide medica attention because of the laws in a state that will not protect him from a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case presented for discussion described above, it was imminent that Dr. Yarnell had a justifiable medical history that supported his symptoms. Nonetheless, it can be argued the way PA Brian decided to evaluate and treat Dr. Yarnell was biased or based on personal interests. PA Brian’s medical judgment was compromised. Mutual personal motivations existed between Dr. Yarnell and PA Brian. However, as a clinician PA Brian should have impartially evaluated Dr. Yarnell by properly and examining and documenting his findings or properly redirecting Dr.Yarnell to a different clinician. If the patient (Dr. Yarnell) was never appropriately examined, how can PA Brian as a health care provider substantiate that the medication prescribed was adequate and beneficial for the…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the defendant, Fernando Maldonado, sued the plaintiff, Gateway Hotel of St. Louis for negligence after having received a knockout that interfered with his cognitive and motor functioning. Later, Gateway appeals the jury verdict in favor of the appellee on his negligence claims. Maldonado claimed the idea of negligence based on the piece of evidence that hotel had failed to provide an ambulance as well as an immediate medical monitoring team when he became unconscious. There are notable core legal issues in this case. To begin with, it is notable that the defendant cited the idea that delay of the ambulance had caused his condition to worsen, although he was later transferred to a hospital through an ambulance. In a huge way, he…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One similarity between this case and the client interview facts is that due to misconduct, both Zelma Mitchell and Natalie Attired were terminated from their jobs.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence the hospital owes certain “duties” directly to the patient, which cannot be delegated to the medical staff. Under the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence Misericordia Community Hospital, owes a duty to its patients to refrain from any act which will cause foreseeable harm to others even though the nature of that harm and identity of the harmed person or harmed interest are unknown at the time of the act (westlaw citation). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Thompson v. Nason Hospital classified the hospital’s duties into four categories. 1) a duty to use reasonable care in the maintenance of safe and adequate facilities and equipment; 2) a duty to select and retain only competent physicians; 3) a duty to oversee all persons who practice medicine within its walls as to patient care; and 4) a duty to formulate, adopt and enforce adequate rules and policies to ensure quality care for the patients. The hospital also failed to adhere to its own bylaw provisions and to the Wisconsin statues related to medical…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Case Study Hcs/335

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I will call Dr. Williams right away to inform him about your situation. I will call you back as soon I get a response from him. I think the easiest way to pick the right decision is by thinking in the consequences. For example, If Jerry decides to call in the prescription for the patient and something happen to him; Jerry will get in serious trouble, he will have to live responsible for a tragedy that he could prevent for the rest of his life, getting fire and thinking how unfair the whole situation was for Dr. Williams only because he decided to make the call. While if he uses my advice the worst thing can happen is that Dr. Williams do not call back to the office before the patient live the state, making the patient…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, Dr. Alexander’s way of treating the patient is a great example of medical malpractice. Although the failure to follow the adequate standard of care might have been unintentional, it resulted in a very significant and permanent damage to the patient. When a patient chooses to go to a hospital to seek medical attention, he or she expects the facility to treat him with excessive care. In this case, the jury found negligence by both Dr. Alexander as well as in the nursing staff in regards to the follow ups as the medical record supported the evidence. I strongly believe that both the physician as well as the hospital (unless the physician was an independent contractor) are both responsible…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conversely, they acted in a careless and negligent way which cost the life of an individual. We live in a society that does not care to help one another in times of need. If the United States required bystanders to simply act in a situation, it could influence morality and basic human decency. Some would argue that they could be sued for providing aid to a victim. For example, an article by Carol J. Williams “Good Samaritans Get No Aid From High Court” explains how someone who is a Good Samaritan might be sued for their actions and states, “It was also thought to be the first ruling by the court that someone who intervened in an accident in good faith could be sued.”…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our first questions and issue discussed deals with the subject “Good Samaritan.” We as a team had to decide should jurisdictions have a “Good Samaritan” law requiring an individual to help another if he or she is able. Without thought or time wasted debating one another, we all agree (except Frank) that no there should not be “Good Samaritan” law. We believed that if individuals want to assist when someone is in distress he or she would do so no matter what. Also our team (except Frank) feels if it were a law that would promote vigilantism. Frank believes if individuals knew there was a law that allows them to help others in a time of need, perhaps more people would get involved when witnessing someone in need of help. Within our team, individually we have done numerous things that are considered acting as a Good Samaritan. Such as helping out car accident victims, helping mom change her tire and lending money to our friend to catch up on some bills.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many lives have been lost due to the physician’s negligence. The physician that saw Abigail Williams, Betty Parish, Betty Hubbard and Anne Putnam Jr. and made an incorrect…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article is trying to reach out to the paramedics and to the people. When the people can not get help from the paramedics because they are too scared to come save someone life the people have to take matters into their own hands to save lives. For example, when people were getting shot the police was taking people in their police cars and regular people was taking injured people in their pickup…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cantway was faced with the difficult task of treating the victim and the attacker. Unbeknownst to him at the time, the two men were only a few hospital beds apart. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath which states in part, “Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty” (“Hippocratic Oath”, 2016). Dr. Cantway knew that although one man was responsible for the other one being there, he had an obligation to treat both to the best of his ability. He may have been tempted to “let” Aaron McKinney die in his care, but his professionalism allowed him to separate his personal feelings from the situation. Karmen (2013) attributes this attitude to avoid burnout. This “protective coating of emotional detachment” (p. 173) that professionals wear, allow them to remain objective and treat many patients without becoming emotionally overwhelmed. Dr. Cantway unselfishly tended to the victims while he, himself was…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics of Emergencies

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethics of Emergencies “The Ethics of Emergencies” explains Ayn Rand’s radical and unique view of altruism. She believes that there are 4 consequences of altruism, all of which are negative. These, simply put, are lack of self-esteem, lack of respect for others, a pessimistic view of life, and an indifference to ethics. She says that altruism hinders acts of true benevolence, and instead people act out of an obligation to others that has been internalized over time. Rand then argues that one should only volunteer to help strangers in emergency situations, and even then, only when the risk to one’s own life is less than the risk to the stranger’s. Rand advocates action in such emergencies because of the high value of human life. But Rand does not believe that assistance should not be given in non- life threatening situations. She views hunger, illness, and poverty as part of the experience of human life and not a threat to human life. Rand also analyzes the motives of those who risk their own lives to save a loved one’s. She denies an altruistic motive and instead cites selfishness as the cause. Rand says the Altruist’s favorite argument is that of the downing man. She disagrees with the notion of saving the man and recommends the contrasting view: "If the person to be saved is a stranger, it is morally proper to save him only if the risk to one's own life is minimal; when the danger is great, it would be immoral to attempt it; only a lack of self esteem could permit one to value one's life no higher than that of any random stranger." I was shocked when I first read her rationale. If you endanger your life to save a stranger, you are immoral! But not just immoral, also psychologically damaged, in that you lack self-esteem! Now imagine the downing man incident occurring in a world where almost everyone has adopted Rand’s moral code. A lone young man is swept out to sea on a dangerous beach. The crowd stands by, doing nothing, as they have too much self-esteem to…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mandatory Reporting Law

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The role of the doctor has been clear and distinct in my life. I have always looked at my doctor as a person who assists me with health issues. But somewhere down the line, the role of the doctor has changed. Doctors are taking on the decision making of the patient. In a recent bill that was passed, practitioners are required to report any physical injury that is due to firearm, assault, or abusive conduct. This law is called, “The Mandatory Reporting Law”, in which it aids victims of domestic violence. However the word “aid” has speculated through many people in examining this law. Mandatory Reporting has become a big controversial topic, in which people…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indeed, accountability and accountability standards are a crucial component of each and every discipline, especially in the field of health care. Health care is a unique business in that; the industry has a fiduciary duty to federal, state, and local governments. Not only do professionals employed within the industry have different professional and ethical…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good Samaritan; Is the person who help others, without asking asking for something. They help because it touches the pain of others. The term comes from a Bible Parable. A good Samaritan risk his life to help others. The story talks about a man who was beaten and robbed in the roads of Jerusalem. And a good Samaritan had compassion of him and he help him.(source 1) In “ If Decency Doesn’t, Law Should Make Us Good Samaritans” (source 1) and “Good Samaritans U.S.A. Are Afraid to Act” (source 2) They have similarities and differences in their main ideas, Different arguments, and discussion of laws.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays