Preview

Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital Case Study
In the Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, Dr. Alexander’s way of treating the patient is a great example of medical malpractice. Although the failure to follow the adequate standard of care might have been unintentional, it resulted in a very significant and permanent damage to the patient. When a patient chooses to go to a hospital to seek medical attention, he or she expects the facility to treat him with excessive care. In this case, the jury found negligence by both Dr. Alexander as well as in the nursing staff in regards to the follow ups as the medical record supported the evidence. I strongly believe that both the physician as well as the hospital (unless the physician was an independent contractor) are both responsible

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Health Care Event

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through the many events that have taken place in the health care industry one that comes to mind is how excessive litigation affecting health care today. Litigation has become so broad that it has become a specialized department in the law industry. When one watches television, listens to the radio, browses the Internet, or looks at other media outlets he or she is bound to come across some advertisements for litigations against health care facilities and professionals at frequent intervals. It is not unexpected to see or hear several of them throughout the day. Law firms have even become specialized in health care related cases and focus on specific conditions caused by some sort of illness, medication, or even procedure. The result of this is that health care facilities close due to the financial burden of payments resulting from litigations, in the long run the amount paid for malpractice insurance rises, insurance premiums rise, and costs of health care increases because of the additional procedures ordered to try to prevent litigation (Satiani, 2004). The practice of defensive medicine is estimated to cost two and a half times average coverage cost and the estimated savings in tort reform is passed in 50 billion dollars…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case presented for discussion described above, it was imminent that Dr. Yarnell had a justifiable medical history that supported his symptoms. Nonetheless, it can be argued the way PA Brian decided to evaluate and treat Dr. Yarnell was biased or based on personal interests. PA Brian’s medical judgment was compromised. Mutual personal motivations existed between Dr. Yarnell and PA Brian. However, as a clinician PA Brian should have impartially evaluated Dr. Yarnell by properly and examining and documenting his findings or properly redirecting Dr.Yarnell to a different clinician. If the patient (Dr. Yarnell) was never appropriately examined, how can PA Brian as a health care provider substantiate that the medication prescribed was adequate and beneficial for the…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why talk about Anderson v GMC or even Keck v Wesley Medical Center? Because staffing is still an issue. It will become more of an issue as reimbursement continues to be curtailed. Moreover, as patient ratios are increasingly mandated, and studies of the impact of nurse staffing on patient outcomes are providing a growing body of knowledge, it is not only possible but likely that now that we can know what is safe hospital leadership will be held liable if they do not maintain safe staffing levels. Indeed, in the Keck case, it is important to note that Keck never filed a suit or even a claim against the nurse assigned to her care. Making a profit at the expense of human life and well-being is and always will be an issue that is directly impacted…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Briefly, the summary judgment facts of St. John v. Pope (1995) noted that Pope, who had recently undergone back pain surgery and epidural injections at Round Rock Hospital, went to the Central Texas Medical Center emergency room in San Marcos for back pain and fever. The emergency room physician, at Central Texas Medical Center, telephoned St. John, the on-call physician, who recommended Pope be referred to the Round Rock Hospital, where his surgeon was on staff. However, when Round Rock Hospital’s emergency room refused to accept Pope, he went home. The following day in a hospital in Austin, a lumbar puncture revealed Pope was suffering from meningitis, which resulted in permanent disabilities (St. John v. Pope, 1995).…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spence case, both parties were in a lawsuit about informed consent. The physician failed to tell the patient of the risks that can happen while going into surgery and any risks that can happen after the surgery. The patient was told of the surgery but did not ask for any additional information. For my personal choice in this case i would find both sides responsible for some of the factors that has happened in the decision making of the physician and the patient. I believe that if the patient has a well grounded mind then the physician should tell them about all the risks for the precare, the surgery itself, and the postoperative care. All of this information can help to save the hospital from a lawsuit. Also, when the patient is presented with an illness that can be helped with an operation they should always do some research about it. This includes being able to ask additional questions and concerns to the…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the dual sovereignty doctrine, is it legally permissible for two states to prosecute the same defendant for the same offense without committing Double Jeopardy?…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Snow Storm Lawsuit Summary

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The scenario made it perfectly clear that the hospital was severely understaffed to accommodate the medical needs of the patients. Malpractice occur when medical professionals act improperly or unethically (Baker, 2006, p.120). This legal issued can be determined when patients died as a result of wrong medications being administered during their visit. “Sometimes the wrong medication is given because the nurse was in a hurry and didn’t double check, the medication was shelved wrong, the doctor prescribed the wrong medication, or the patient was given another patient’s medication” (Pritzker, 2012). Incidents as such, have a higher possibility of taking place when health care staffs are overworked. According to the scenario, the patient units were understaffed, and health care personnel on day shift had to stay until they were relieved from their duties, and this causes fatigue which causes an increased risk of negligence that leads to…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Law / Emtala

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The article I chose to discuss was a court case involving the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). A Dickinson County hospital violated EMTALA for failing to provide emergency care for a patient who was transferred to a different hospital without being completely stable enough for transfer. In 1985, Congress passed the law of “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act” also known as (EMTALA) to ensure public access and treatment to emergency services regardless of race, ability to pay, or legal status (U.S. Dept. of Health, 2010). This act states that all individuals needing emergency medical support should never be discharged or transferred until their condition is stable. This act also states that hospitals should then provide stabilizing treatment for patients with emergency medical conditions. If a hospital cannot stabilize a patient within its capability, the hospitals duty is then to treat the patient’s condition and in the event the patient needs to be transferred to become stable then a risk and benefit consent form needs to be signed by the patient. The transferring physician must also sign a certificate that explains the transfer outweighs the risks of not being transferred. In this paper I will examine the court case and convey how this case relates to the nature, sources, and functions of the law.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    difffrence

    • 2773 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Hapless Hospital is concerned about fulfilling its obligations under JCAHO to adequately evaluate applicants for Medical Staff Privileges. Dr. Goody, a board certified surgeon, was appointed by the hospital's credentials committee to be a proctor for (observe) a surgeon who had applied for staff privileges. In accordance with the hospital bylaws, Dr. Goody was asked to observe ten (10) surgeries performed by the applicant and then submit a written report to the credentials committee. The patient in one of those surgeries sued the surgeon and Dr. Goody claiming that the surgeon committed malpractice and Dr. Goody failed to intervene.…

    • 2773 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Health care is a vast ever-changing demand in the United States. Because of that high demand, quality has been a concern for many patients. Each day patients put their health and trust in the hands of health care providers. Unfortunately, there have been times when the treatment provided, whether accidental or intentional, has caused harm to the patient. Patients who have experienced injury have the right to file a civil complaint against that provider that caused the injury. Some possible reasons for civil complaints are that personal information for a patient was shared without proper consent, negligence, or assault. These injuries are covered under Tort Law. This essay will identify a civil complaint process that patients may follow in the event of misconduct or incompetence by a provider. The role of the regulatory agencies to investigate the allegations of the misconduct will be discussed along with how they apply disciplinary actions if warranted. Potential criminal liabilities, risk management strategies, quality assurance programs to reduce the risk of liability and the process to follow in the event that charges are filed against a provider will all be identified.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Apology

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When they see the physician being apologetic, this need is met. This calms the sufferers and their family’s anger. As a result, there is less number of litigations. For example, the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky, adopted the policy that they will take responsibility for their mistakes and apologize. In next ten years, they had a significant decrease in the net legal cost for the hospital (Jonathan R. Cohen, May 21, 2010).…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I felt this case was of negligence and malpractice, how can someone complain about their discomfort, provide relevant medical history and not get the proper diagnosis. They could have provided a more I depth diagnosis or allowed for a longer observation period. Hospitals often struggle to find a balance between profit and patient care. If the profit margin was not the first priority, then maybe we can avoid similar cases like this. It seems that the struggle for tort reform in finding a good balance between protecting healthcare institutions and at the same time allow for patients the opportunity to pursue compensation when malpractice does occur is…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This case of U.S government versus defendant McClatchey involves hospital CEO, two physicians, and Mr. McClatchy who is a part of the administrative staff at Baptist Medical center. Two physicians involved in the case worked together in a group practice called BVMG that provided care to the nursing homes. In 1984, they brought a proposal to the Baptist Medical Center to have them buy the practice and in return physicians were to refer their patients from other hospitals to Baptist medical center. This proposal was rejected; however, some negotiation of this plan took place and Baptist medical center agreed to pay a fee of 75,000 dollars to each doctor for providing some services to the medical center. The doctors and the medical center stayed in contract until 1993 and it was told in the testimony that contract was still kept even after learning that the doctors were not providing the services that they promised to provide in that contract.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays