Preview

Legal Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Brief
United States V McClatchey
217 F3d 823 Cir., (10th , 2000)

I. Background
This case of U.S government versus defendant McClatchey involves hospital CEO, two physicians, and Mr. McClatchy who is a part of the administrative staff at Baptist Medical center. Two physicians involved in the case worked together in a group practice called BVMG that provided care to the nursing homes. In 1984, they brought a proposal to the Baptist Medical Center to have them buy the practice and in return physicians were to refer their patients from other hospitals to Baptist medical center. This proposal was rejected; however, some negotiation of this plan took place and Baptist medical center agreed to pay a fee of 75,000 dollars to each doctor for providing some services to the medical center. The doctors and the medical center stayed in contract until 1993 and it was told in the testimony that contract was still kept even after learning that the doctors were not providing the services that they promised to provide in that contract.

II. Procedural History.
A jury convicted McClatchey of conspiracy to violate the Medicare Anti-Kickback Act by offering and paying remuneration to the two doctors involved in the case. Hoping or maintaining a purpose for doctors to refer their nursing home patients to Baptist Medical Center was a violation; moreover, he was also violating or aiding and abetting violations of the Act by knowingly and willfully offering and paying remuneration in return for such referrals. The district court granted Mr . McClatchey 's motion for judgment of acquittal , finding that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support a conviction for either offense. The judge stated that to convict McClatchy of both the conspiracy charge and the substantive charge of violating the Act, the government needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that McClatchy knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy with the specific intent to violate the Act.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gahsa Rjewrj Wv

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Potterschmidt wants the court to permit him to pierce the veil of both Thomas J. Klosterman, M.D. and Klosterman Family Practice, Inc., to hold Dr. Klosterman directly liable for the money?…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: In December 1973 Robert Steinberg, the plaintiff, applied for admissions to the Chicago Medical School. He paid an application fee of $15, but his application was rejected. After being rejected he filed against the school, claiming that they did not evaluate his application according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school’s bulletin. Steinberg argues that the school based its decision primarily on nonacademic consideration such as family connections between the applicant and his family to donate large sums of money to the school. Steinberg assets that by evaluating his application to these unpublished criteria, the school breached the contract it had created when it accepted…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suit was filed in May 2014 [Doc. #1] by Jackson HMA (the “Hospital”), seeking to recover damages from Physician…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Neither party attempted to terminate the contract and Dr. Dominy was also paid for his work at MHM. Dr. Dominy was also granted other benefits from NES, which were listed in the arrangements of the contract until its contract was terminated by the hospital with NES. The contract was also not considered overly restrictive because the time and areal outcome of the contract prevented Dr. Dominy from becoming a big competitor of the NES Company immediately after his termination of contract with MHM (Pozgar & Santucci, 2015, p. 137, para. 7). I agree with the court’s decision because the noncompetitive clause protected the lawful concerns of the employer, it did not institute any unreasonable adversity on the employee, and the contract was not conflicting of the public’s…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On September 11th,2012 Alexandra Anderson made an appointment for September 15th, 2012 with the Apple Genius Bar at their Woodland Hills location in Tulsa, Oklahoma.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75,000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70,000 cash for the property which Mr. Potbelly immediately accepts the offer. Mr. Slim Jim informs Mr. Potbelly that he will be back in one hour with a cashiers’ check made payable to Mr. Potbelly. Mr. Potbelly says “Great!” and that while Mr. Slim Jim is getting the money that he will find a box in his basement for the pottery.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “a charitable institution is not responsible for its torts” (McDonald v. Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts)…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Case Brief

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Statement of Facts: On 8 May 2015 David Smith drove his car through a red light. Afterwards, he then plowed into Ms. John Doe’s car, mangling it beyond repair. Fortunately, Ms. Doe escaped with minor scratches and bruises, even though she was seven and one-half months pregnant. Four days later she delivered a stillborn infant. The operating physicians concluded the unborn baby had died from injuries sustained in the accident. Ms. Doe had seen Dr. Horace Mann at her regularly scheduled check-up approximately two weeks before the accident. His records show Ms. Doe was in good health and the child’s condition was “normal” for one conceived about seven months earlier. Dr. Mann thinks the baby was probably capable of a separate existence outside the womb.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal summary

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    Facts: the case between the two cases were intense, Lionel was trading Mikes Trains House Secrets, Once Mikes Train House Inc. found out in they began arguing in court on June, 7th 2006. The court took almost 6 months to come to the ruling. Defendant Lionel, L.L.C., is found guilty and liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and the use of blueprints, awarding the Plaintiff, Mike's Train House Inc., over $40 million in damages and $11 million in lost profit. MTH identified its "trade secrets" the joint and liability of the amount of the damage awarded. Lionel also appeals the court, granting MTH's request for order, Because Lionel argues that the court admitted expert testimony.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case

    • 5575 Words
    • 23 Pages

    PUSEY, EXR., APPELLANT, v. BATOR ET AL.; GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Pusey v. Bator (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 275.] Torts — Wrongful death — Employer hires independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property — Inherently dangerous work exception — If someone is injured by weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence, employer is vicariously liable even though guard responsible is an employee of the independent contractor. (No. 00-1787 — Submitted October 30, 2001 — Decided February 27, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 98 C.A. 55. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT When an employer hires an independent contractor to provide armed security guards to protect property, the inherently-dangerous-work exception is triggered such that if someone is injured by the weapon as a result of a guard’s negligence, the employer is vicariously liable even though the guard responsible is an employee of the independent contractor. __________________ DOUGLAS, J. At all times relevant herein, defendant-appellee, Greif…

    • 5575 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article is about settlement of $238 million for the kickback allegations which commences from a whistle-blower lawsuit. It stated that four Georgia Hospitals, namely, the Atlanta Medical Center, North Fulton Hospital on Roswell, Spalding Regional Hospital on Griffin and Hilton Head Hospital on Hilton Head Island knowingly infringed the False Claims Act or FCA. Cleverley, W.O., Song, P.H., and Cleverley, J.O., (2011) defined the False Claim Act (FCA) which is the federal government’s primary civil remedy for improper or fraudulent claims. This article fit the description that the four Georgia hospitals committed fraud by illegally acquiring kickbacks from referrals by “contracting with a clinic operated by Hispanic Medical Management for prenatal care provided to uninsured patients.” According to Cleverley, W.O., et al, “Qui tam actions are also known as “whistleblower” suits. In a Qui tam action a relator with personal knowledge of a fraud brings a suit against a defendant on behalf of the government.” The discovery was made due to the suspicious amount “the company reported $97 million net loss for the fourth quarter of 2015 compared with a $61 million net profit in the same quarter of 2014.” In addition, “the company reported a $140 million net loss for the full year, compared with a $12 million profit in 2014.”…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advanced Directives

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Miller, Robert D., Hutton, Rebecca C. Problems in Health Care Law (8th Ed.). (2000). Gaithersburg: An Aspen Publication.…

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emtala

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was enacted in 1986 as a part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) of 1985. EMTALA was enacted to prevent hospitals with Emergency Departments from refusing to treat or transferring patients with emergency medical conditions (EMC) due to an inability to pay for their services. This act also applies to satellite locations whom advertise titles such as “Immediate Care” or “Urgent Care,” and all other facilities where one-third of their patient intake are walk-ins. Several rules and regulations to this act have been established and it has become a very serious piece of legislation and health care regulation, as it is enforced by several government entities. Originally known as the “anti-dumping act,” EMTALA has saved the accreditation of health care today as it was quickly in transformation to becoming an unreliable, acquisitive practice, rather than a dependable source of care.…

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics