The Government Should Regulate School Lunches
School lunch may not be every students favorite part of the day, but lunch can make a big impact on a child. Study shows that,” a change in lunch can make an effect on the obesity rate”(Walshmedpagetoday). The gov’t should control school lunches to reduce the obesity epidemic and health risks.
School Lunch has been around for a long time in fact school lunch was started by President Harry Truman in 1946. School lunch is offered to all students to provide a nutritionally balanced meal everyday for low or free cost.Over the years obesity rates have highly risen which first lady Michelle Obama wanted to make a change in the obesity rates of our kids , Michelle established Healthy Hunger Act in 2010. It was reported that , “The bill …show more content…
It is not just this but students are not getting healthy food. We need to get rid of processed food and get organic meals. Most schools are only serving foods that can just be heated up and the served to students. We need to regulate what kids eat they can't be eating a cupcake just for lunch.” The meals can be healthy and still have a good taste to it the cafeteria management of all participating schools open their sources and stop the heat and serve method . Students that eat unhealthy foods at home could be very beneficial to the regulations because they would be having grains fruits and vegetables at school and they would balance a healthier diet , especially with low-income families. Another, anonymous user stated a very important opinion , “First of all, it's not that ridiculous for a school to require children to eat fruits and vegetables. The processed foods that poison our bodies are not healthy! It's that simple! Teaching children to eat healthy food is in no way detrimental. It's not like schools will begin forcing children to eat only approved foods; schools will be regulated so that the lunches provided are made with healthier ingredients. And for those griping about how nasty the food is: if we all give up a decent sum of money now, we will not have to pay slow steady taxes for the regulations, and with a decent amount of money something beneficial can actually be done. Taking out this problem with one swift swing would make it efficient, beneficial (unlike many other government programs), and increase our childrens' health. Also, children will be allowed to take food to school. Regulation does not mean communism! Our children are the future, and have you seen the effects that obesity has? If these obesity concerns
School Lunch has been around for a long time in fact school lunch was started by President Harry Truman in 1946. School lunch is offered to all students to provide a nutritionally balanced meal everyday for low or free cost.Over the years obesity rates have highly risen which first lady Michelle Obama wanted to make a change in the obesity rates of our kids , Michelle established Healthy Hunger Act in 2010. It was reported that , “The bill …show more content…
It is not just this but students are not getting healthy food. We need to get rid of processed food and get organic meals. Most schools are only serving foods that can just be heated up and the served to students. We need to regulate what kids eat they can't be eating a cupcake just for lunch.” The meals can be healthy and still have a good taste to it the cafeteria management of all participating schools open their sources and stop the heat and serve method . Students that eat unhealthy foods at home could be very beneficial to the regulations because they would be having grains fruits and vegetables at school and they would balance a healthier diet , especially with low-income families. Another, anonymous user stated a very important opinion , “First of all, it's not that ridiculous for a school to require children to eat fruits and vegetables. The processed foods that poison our bodies are not healthy! It's that simple! Teaching children to eat healthy food is in no way detrimental. It's not like schools will begin forcing children to eat only approved foods; schools will be regulated so that the lunches provided are made with healthier ingredients. And for those griping about how nasty the food is: if we all give up a decent sum of money now, we will not have to pay slow steady taxes for the regulations, and with a decent amount of money something beneficial can actually be done. Taking out this problem with one swift swing would make it efficient, beneficial (unlike many other government programs), and increase our childrens' health. Also, children will be allowed to take food to school. Regulation does not mean communism! Our children are the future, and have you seen the effects that obesity has? If these obesity concerns