Preview

The Electoral College Should Be Abolished

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Electoral College Should Be Abolished
The Electoral college is a very controversial subject that has a big impact on American history. Every four years, people vote for the president… Or do they? You actually vote for electors that represent your state, and the bigger states get more electors. Sounds perfect right? Wrong. The way the electors are distributed is not perfect, and three times in American history, the person who won the popular vote did not win the electoral vote. That happened in 1888, 2000, and 2016. Because of this, electoral college should be abolished because it is outdated, it does not always reflect the popular vote, and it causes candidates to only campaign in certain states.
The electoral college does not always reflect the popular vote. The popular vote is …show more content…
It is called faithless electors. Now there are tons of arguments against the electoral college, but this one is by far the strongest. In most elections, the person who wins the electoral vote wins the popular vote. But it is actually possible to win the presidency with zero percent of the popular vote. Even though the 21.8% was mentioned earlier in this essay, that number is gotten is assuming all the electoral voters vote for who they are supposed to be voting for. According to Tyler Lewis, “While electors are generally extremely loyal to the party they align with, they don’t have to vote the way the people of their state instructed them to. In other words, just because a candidate won the popular vote in your state does not mean that your electors have to cast a vote for said candidate themselves.” What Tyler Lewis is stating there is that electors can vote for whoever they want! So one person can override the decision made by thousands, if not millions, of people! A person who does not vote for their states candidate is called a faithless elector. Sure, this rarely happens because some states have penalties if you do this and it has never happened enough to directly affect the results of the election, but the plain fact that this can even happen in the first place is a threat to America’s …show more content…
After all those reasons so far, these reasons they present make no sense whatsoever. According to USA Today, “If the national popular vote were the ultimate decider, candidates would gravitate toward the voter-rich big cities and their suburbs and ignore everyone else.” Well, USA Today, I know this outdated system will help your precious evil crazy republican Trump dude become president, but it is not democratic. I’m sorry farm guys, but if cities make up the majority, then the interests of the cities will be followed. That's what democracy is all about! And they also say that candidates will only campaign in suburbs and cities. Well, under this current system, they only campaign in swing states! Man, this article is just a bunch of excuses. And there are more examples.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College System
    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College System

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Electoral College
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Electoral College

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College: A Trouble Prone And Undemocratic System
    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Electoral College: A Trouble Prone And Undemocratic System

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College
    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay
    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Should The Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

    A vote in Wyoming is worth 3.6x as much as a vote in California. Besides that, the candidates only focus on a small number of states.. In fact, Politico states “Today, roughly two-thirds of the states are written off as the province of one party or the other before the first primary votes are even cast. ”5 Later on in the same article, only 11 states are mentioned as “battleground states” for the 2016 election (Battleground states are states where there is not a clear winner based on past trends.) Basically, if you don’t live in the 11 states that are battlegrounds, people in those states will have their opinions and needs put before…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

    Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons For Electoral College
    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons For Electoral College

    The Electoral College always has it’s print on the elections and more importantly on the very close elections. It has done it’s job the over 200 plus years and throughout fifty presidential elections. So the electoral college is promising and durable. Both parties Republican and Democrat candidate feel at times as if they win the popular vote they win the election, but that’s when the electoral votes play their part. The electoral votes are combined by states…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Reasons Why The Electoral College Should Go
    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three Reasons Why The Electoral College Should Go

    In my opinion, the Electoral College should go. I have three reasons why the Electoral College should be either get rid of. My reasons are that it focuses more on smaller states than big states, Hamilton had other intentions for the Electoral College, and the Electoral College was meant to be for small states so it would be more equal.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of An Electoral College
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of An Electoral College

    The system of electing our president has been fairly consistent throughout the past 50 years and one thing that has not changed since our constitution was written is the use of an electoral college to elect the president. By using an Electoral College voters do not directly vote for their next president, instead they submit a vote that is then tallied by the electors and whichever party has the most votes at the end gets all of the Electoral College votes from that state. The use of an Electoral College has been the topic of a lot of debate in recent years, especially after the election in the year 2000 in which Al Gore won the popular vote, but failed to become president because George W. Bush won the electoral votes. There are people whom favor the use of an electoral college and there are people who think that it should be abolished and that voters should be able to directly vote for their president. For my paper I want to present both arguments, each side’s pros and cons, and ultimately whether or not I think we should or should not change the use of an electoral college.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College Should Not Be President-Elect
    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Electoral College Should Not Be President-Elect

    The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College for reasons that are no longer relevant in the election process. The Founding Fathers created the Electoral college to prevent the direct election of the President and to make sure the President-elect is qualified. Electors used to be seen as “free from any sinister bias” (Hamilton), but are now chosen by their political parties and expected to vote accordingly, regardless of their own opinion. Many laws, that have limited or prevented direct democracy, have been changed, so why shouldn’t the electoral college be…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Should Electoral College Be Abolished
    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Should Electoral College Be Abolished

    The Electoral College should not be abolished, because if it is then the election process would collapse. The Electoral College was created because “normal citizens” were not deemed worth of voting because they would not know what or who they were voting for. The system is built in a way that is complicated, but it works, here is how it works: all US states and DC get one electoral vote for each of their US Senators and Representatives. The Representatives’ votes are determined by the decennial census, and the US Senators have 2 per state. There are 538 votes in the Electoral College and all the candidate needs to get to win is 270 votes. This is a system that has been around since the Constitutional Convention, so why is there any reason to change it. The reason that it has been around for so long is because the Electoral College was made so that the two major political parties would have an advantage against the minority or third parties. They did this because the third parties focus too much on one issue and that would be disastrous for our government. But third parties do deserve to still be in the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College Should Not Be Abolished
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Electoral College Should Not Be Abolished

    Two hundred and seventy votes to win the president of the united states. The nation’s most protected person. The electoral college has the power to vote one of two candidates the president. The electoral college has overpowered the popular vote of the people in many cases. The electoral college should not be abolished for the main reason that the people who have the position to cast one of the votes know what's best for our country.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of The Electoral College
    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Benefits Of The Electoral College

    The Electoral College wins are bigger than the popular vote. This should not be the case. Actually, it should be the other way around. There have been Presidents in the past, that have won without the majority popular vote and this is just bogus. In fact, five times this has happened. John Quincy Adams, Benjamin Harrison, George Bush and even Donald Trump have failed with the popular vote but won the Electoral side. The Electors are good at their job, however, there are people that strategically keep up with the Presidential Election. I know that the Electoral College major in the Presidential Election, but the people should be the majority national vote. This argument definitely has some vast points and very true altercations. However, I am still for keeping the Electoral College. There are some citizens that go with the more popular candidate and are totally ignorant about him/her that they are voting for. So, because of these kinds of people who just say “Oh, I do not care about who's running I'm just going to wing it”. This is where the Electoral College is a tremendous advantage because it actually specializes in the candidates that are running. Yes, the Electoral College has outdone the popular vote five times. Who would someone rather vote for a person who specializes in the Presidency or a citizen who is ignorant on the subject of…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics