It is diverse, both, racially and religiously. The Electoral College accepts people who are Hindi, Christian, African American, Chinese and etc. Thanks to the fifteenth amendment, everyone can vote for equality. Without the Electoral College, the votes of urban and rural areas would not be accounted for the same way. People wouldn’t care if a small town in the middle of nowhere voted. But, they would if say, NYC voted. There are fewer mistakes with the Electoral College, too. Let's say that it's snowing, are people going to go more on a sunny or snowy day? Sunny, so they would have fewer votes. But, the Electoral College always comes no matter what. Sunshine or rain they come, meet and vote …show more content…
The Electoral College wins are bigger than the popular vote. This should not be the case. Actually, it should be the other way around. There have been Presidents in the past, that have won without the majority popular vote and this is just bogus. In fact, five times this has happened. John Quincy Adams, Benjamin Harrison, George Bush and even Donald Trump have failed with the popular vote but won the Electoral side. The Electors are good at their job, however, there are people that strategically keep up with the Presidential Election. I know that the Electoral College major in the Presidential Election, but the people should be the majority national vote. This argument definitely has some vast points and very true altercations. However, I am still for keeping the Electoral College. There are some citizens that go with the more popular candidate and are totally ignorant about him/her that they are voting for. So, because of these kinds of people who just say “Oh, I do not care about who's running I'm just going to wing it”. This is where the Electoral College is a tremendous advantage because it actually specializes in the candidates that are running. Yes, the Electoral College has outdone the popular vote five times. Who would someone rather vote for a person who specializes in the Presidency or a citizen who is ignorant on the subject of