Preview

The Deception Of Well-Educated Scientists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
371 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Deception Of Well-Educated Scientists
There is a common underlying theme among these readings. Humans can sometimes have thinking patterns that can lead their thoughts down deceptive paths when trying to think analytically. One that was brought up in several readings and was also pointed out in class, was the deception of authority. People have been primed to believe what they are told by authority figures and to not ask questions.
Realizing this and fighting against this habit, is a key part in being a well-educated scientist. The main idea here is that we have many pre-dispositions of thought that can be harmful when it comes to making logical choices. In order to continue to improve the scientific world around us we must be aware of these biases’ and look to improve upon these faults.
…show more content…
It seems weird that I didn’t realize it before but there is no such thing as a “fact” in science, in the way that the rest of the world views the word fact. For instance nothing can be proven in science. There is always a chance that is it wrong. The world views the word fact as something that cannot be wrong, that it is an irrefutable claim. Where as in science the word fact is simply an observation that has been made. The problem with this I realized is that the word fact is interpreted differently by the public compared to the way scientists use is. Creating a rift in the way the science world is proceeded and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this essay, John M. Barry uses antithesis to display a contrast in his thoughts and the assuming thoughts of the readers. In doing this, the author is not only able to show the readers the different sides of how scientists are perceived by people, but as well as how they actually are in the world of scientific research. The author collates certainty and uncertainty as an example for the readers to view that scientists of the world are just like them. Scientists contain “certainty, [which] creates strength, and uncertainty, [which] creates weakness” (Barry). In using these disparities, Barry is showing the readers that “science teaches us to doubt” (Barry). By elaborating on the concepts of certainty and uncertainty, readers are able to see…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During a passage from the Great Influenza, author John M. Barry discusses the qualifications a scientific researcher must yield in order to be efficient to the field and perform intelligent guesswork. Appealing to inspiring scientists, Barry insists that they have to “manipulate and even force experiments to yield and answer.” Without the ability to work with uncertainty, no work done will be enough to illuminate the subject. Through juxtaposition uncertainty and certainty in this professional field, Barry showcases the classifications of scientists with analogies and metaphors in a catalogue form. Barry begins by promptly identifying the counter argument; how uncertainty is a weakness for a scientist.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barry presents rhetorical strategies as a means to characterize scientific research. He thinks that being a “scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” Scientific research can be courageous and dangerous. In science, people tend to doubt scientists because their discoveries it seems unreal. Even scientists such as Einstein probably doubted his own theory until his predictions were tested.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article,"Why do many Reasonable People doubt Science?", the writer, Joel Achenbach, asserts that people disbelief science for a variety of reasons. He first described dogmatism and naive beliefs, which are subconscious intuitions that people cling to, to be the reason why many disbelieve science. He further explains that many are reliant on personal experience and anecdotes rather than hard facts and statistics to come to conclusions and that is why many disagree with scientific findings. Achenbach, in his article, also mentioned that, another reason for the disbelief of science is political where "disbelievers", claim that the purport of science, especially in the aspects of climate change, is a propaganda of climate activists and environmentalists who seek to employ the idea of global warming to attack the free market and industrial society. He also mentioned that the disbelief is science is caused the fact that,…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluating aspects from a scientific perspective is not limited to only people who are pursuing science as a career or major. Atul Gawande, respected surgeon and author, understands this concept well and works to encourage the public to trust in testing a hypothesis no matter how profound. Through utilizing the strategies of incorporating personal experience, rhetorical questions, and a motivational tone, Gawande’s article, The Mistrust of Science, pushes readers to face challenges without a doubt.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moore, Brooke Noel, and Richard Parker. Critical thinking. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2007. Print.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What would successful learning of science concepts look like? How do we know that science concepts are ‘difficult to learn’? Although the research literature often fails to articulate this position, research measurements suggest that learners are judged by comparison with the scientific community in three ways. Firstly, using accumulated science knowledge, comparing the learner’s use of concepts, explanations and reasoning with correct science. Secondly, by using example ‘scientists’ to compare novice and expert scientists. Thirdly, by using explicit criteria of ‘scientific-ness’ derived from philosophy of science.…

    • 6062 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you know many scientists use 10% or more of the time they live to discover complicated things? Mistakes happen every day. Mistakes usually lead to problems but sometimes these mistakes lead to discovery. Small mistakes can cause big trouble. Everyday everybody makes mistakes but every day we don't discover new things.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advances in technology have placed an abundance of information at the world’s finger tips. Without critical thinking a person will be unable to separate what is valuable from information that is useless. Critical thinking can be compared to strenuous movement because thinking is hard work. For example at the end of ones day if that person stayed open minded and grasped onto different ideas, that person must now evaluated the evidence supporting those ideas. The National Science Foundation surveyed public attitudes and knowledge about science, they found that 70% of American adults said they were interested in science, but fewer than 30% could give a passable definition of a scientific experiment or…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics In Science

    • 1304 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethics is the difference between what is morally right and wrong. A scientist has to know the ethical consequences of their work. The scientist is responsible. There are many consequences like the harm and amount of risk and benefit in science. There are also ethical procedures involved in science. These procedures include promoting aims of research and knowledge. These procedures help ensure accountability. The big difference is that ethics and laws are not the same. Laws are established rules while ethics is the morals of a culture. Ethics is important because it makes sure that cooperation and joint endeavors run smoothly. One example of ethics in science is stem cell research. Stem Cell Research is when undeveloped cells are molded from adult cells, embryonic cells, and cord cells to finally be created as other cells.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Misleading Research

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most popular advertisements shown on TV, billboards or magazines is for make-up. Many of these make-up ads are for foundation where the models are portrayed as having beautiful, young, healthy and flawless faces. Along with the photos are things such as, “Skin looks 5 years younger in 4 weeks” or “lashes 2X more volume”. In reality many of these advertisements have been edited and have had post- production Photoshop. In July, the United Kingdom’s Advertising Standards Authority banned two L’Oreal print ads that featured airbrushed models. The cosmetic firm admitted to promoting an "anti-ageing" foundation that had been altered to "lighten the skin, clean up make-up, reduce dark shadows and shading around the eyes, smooth the lips and darken the eyebrows".…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pursuit of knowledge and imagination are directly proportional, it increases when a person is able to visualize the concept. If the scientist is not able to predict the possible outcomes of the experiment through imagination, and then the investigation could possibly be pointless. Consider a common example of Sir Issac Newton, when he was sitting under the tree an apple fell on his head and he started thinking about the concept of gravity. He imagined the concept and supported it through reasoning. If he did not visualize the concept of the gravity in reality, then the perspective would be unlike. Similarly, in IB DP Biology Individual Investigation, I assumed that one-minute jumping jack cardio exercise will have an impact on the blood composition of either male or female. The composition in natural sciences is dissimilar from the Arts. It means the change in the percentage. Terminology can also be the reason in creation of disagreement. After the experimentation, I found that the impact of the exercise is neutral in both genders. The results I imagined before the experimentation increased my pursuit of knowledge. Students learn concepts through shared knowledge in the area of natural sciences. The imagination and concepts in natural sciences arrive through shared knowledge. The concepts in the natural sciences were developed by the well-known scientists. The concepts are robust knowledge,…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problem Energizers

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. “Thinkers” usually analyze the materials they read. They weigh values, and question occurrences using other…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is in light of this that I find the almost authoritarian “You shall accept what I tell thee, and don’t ask me questions!” attitude that is so much a feature of science educators (this would appear to be a feature of educators here in general, too) here a bit bizarre, for science class, in my opinion, is a place that should not only entail knowing what is known to be true, but…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays