Preview

Barry's Rhetorical Strategies To Characterize Scientific Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Barry's Rhetorical Strategies To Characterize Scientific Research
Barry presents rhetorical strategies as a means to characterize scientific research. He thinks that being a “scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” Scientific research can be courageous and dangerous. In science, people tend to doubt scientists because their discoveries it seems unreal. Even scientists such as Einstein probably doubted his own theory until his predictions were tested.
Barry starts his piece of writing by stating that having plenty of courage and strength can lead to a high creative level. Scientists need to have more certainty within themselves because “uncertainty makes one tentative if not fearful, and tentative steps, even when in the right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Connell west was an extraordinary force of charisma in his presentation in our San Marcos College. The opener before his speech stated Cornell West credentials on his success at going to both Yale and Harvard and him being a college professor in multiple highly esteemed colleges. Cornell West is a wise individual who spoke on many issues that we have discussed in class. His passion firefighting for the oppressed and the marginalized people in society crosses themes that we have come across in our readings and lectures. Cornell West was passionate about what he was discussing, and his enthusiasm for reasonableness transcended to the audience who became passionate with him.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, John M. Barry uses antithesis to display a contrast in his thoughts and the assuming thoughts of the readers. In doing this, the author is not only able to show the readers the different sides of how scientists are perceived by people, but as well as how they actually are in the world of scientific research. The author collates certainty and uncertainty as an example for the readers to view that scientists of the world are just like them. Scientists contain “certainty, [which] creates strength, and uncertainty, [which] creates weakness” (Barry). In using these disparities, Barry is showing the readers that “science teaches us to doubt” (Barry). By elaborating on the concepts of certainty and uncertainty, readers are able to see…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this article the Pentagon's grand rhetoric wasn't matched with any great influx of funding for science, and it wasn't clear how any one technology could help fight a loosely organized, deliberately low-tech enemy. In 2005, Iraq was experimenting with roadside bombs so to counter these improvised explosives, Pentagon officials called the academic community for the “Manhattan Project”. The Manhattan Project was basically a big bomb that the U.S. wanted to create to try to scare other countries. Six years later, the Department of Defense spent approximately $17 billion on countering improvised explosives but the vast majority of that money has gone on implementing known solutions such as stronger armor for vehicles and personnel, not advanced…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ron Carlson’s Reading the Paper is a list of the things occurring in the time period of a day in the life of a character. The idea of the common everyday life is represented with the very first sentence: ALL I WANT TO DO is read the paper, but I’ve got to do the wash first.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter S. Goodman, executive of business and global news editor at TheHuffingtonPost.com, has strong feelings about foreign news coverage. He feels that America lacks the foreign news coverage that they need. Goodman builds his argument through his use of logos, stating his position, and also by giving an opposing view/concession as well as his goals for the future.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John M. Berry’s speech, during the time of the influenza, his audience is the people in general, especially those curious about scientists and their work. The purpose is to prove to people that scientific research is very challenging. Furthermore, he discussed how scientists must accept uncertainty in order to find an answer to their experiment; it is very difficult for people to accept uncertainty. John M. Berry is able to characterize scientific research as challenging by showing all scientists must embrace uncertainty in the beginning of his speech, undergo tedious work towards the middle of his speech, and find the correct solution to their experiment at the end of his speech.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In March of 1992, Dr. Richard Sanford wrote an outspoken paper opposing the claims of the global warming hysteria of recent time. Sanford discusses how people accept global warming theories as scientific fact without questioning their validity. I can honestly say that I was one of these people who agreed with the media's interpretation of these theories. After reviewing the pro global warming material in the course text, Environmental Science, written by G. Tyler Miller, and reading several articles on the opposition of global warming, I find myself becoming not a hardcore skeptic, but someone that will no longer take information at face value without reviewing as many of the particulars as possible.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Price of Certainty” By Daniele Anastasion, uses Ethos and Logos as his main rhetorical appeals, but also hints towards Pathos and Kairos. He also uses Ethos by introducing a well renowned psychologist by the name of Aire Kruglanski to explain what he calls “cognitive closure”. Which entails that when deciding on something people generally only focus in on what makes them happy, and makes them feel secure. The main idea of what this video is about is the idea that Certainty can be either good or bad, but the line between good and bad is not something that anybody can tell from. For example, when people believe that terrorist are bad, and they associate everybody who looks or comes from the same place or even believe in the same religion…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CD3: Peer Review for Aaron M. This was a good speech to pick for a rhetorical analysis because you seem to enjoy the content, which makes it easier to write about, and it has clear elements to analyze (like ethos, pathos, and logos). Your essay discusses both the rhetorical situation and the rhetorical triangle well without going on tangents or including unnecessary information. Your introduction and body paragraphs focus on rhetorical analysis but the conclusion seems to stray. Your conclusion should focus more on if Kennedy’s argument was strong and effective rather than your opinion of the speech.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a response to sixth-grader Phyllis Wright’s inquiry about prayers in scientists’ lives, Albert Einstein employs rhetorical appeals to character and reason in order to encourage thought from her but ultimately answers her question insufficiently. Since it is already understood that Einstein is the writer, he does not need to establish his credibility. However, he does take advantage his reputation to make broad, encompassing statements about scientists that few others could. For example, an amateur scientist would only be able to represent himself, but Einstein can accurately portray the scientific community by using first person pronouns like “our” and “we” and making generalizing statements about “everyone who is involved in science.” Not…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts to conclude his piece with the following: “Today, you become part of the scientific community, arguably the most powerful collective enterprise in human history” (Gawande 18). Almost as if to honor his audience for their achievement, he grants everyone a valuable title by means of affirming the importance of people’s participation when it comes to studying the world. Readers will finally begin to recognize their role in what it takes to test a hypothesis, regardless of how narrow it may seem. “Even more than what you think, how you think matters . . . because we are not just battling for what it means to be scientists” (Gawande 20). He inspires others with fortitude before finishing his article in order to attain a lasting impact. Essentially, certifying one’s purpose in a significant matter proves to generate positive…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "How, then, does one go about encouraging scientific creativity? For now than ever before in man’s history, we must; and the need will grow constantly in the future." (7)…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a letter that Albert Einstein writes, he uses ethos and logos to effectively answer Phyllis Wright’s question on whether scientists pray. In order to achieve this, Einstein first utilizes ethos to give credibility to the answer. He explicitly states that the response is his own opinion by saying “my answer” in the first sentence. This man is considered to be the greatest scientist of the twentieth century and if it is his answer, Wright will be convinced with his response. Also, Wright specifically wrote to him and so when he responds personally, Wright will trust the response because she respects Einstein enough to write to him. Additionally, Einstein successfully employs logos to assist in his purpose to answer the question. For example,…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Einstein report

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Albert Einstein, also known as the greatest scientist of the twentieth century, and a Nobel-prize winner, receives a letter from a sixth-grade girl named Phyllis Wright questioning if scientists pray, - and if so, what do they pray for - Einstein simultaneously uses various rhetoric methods such as SOAPS, ethos, logos, and pathos to respond to Wright’s question in the simplest form possible, and in doing so, Einstein created a rhetorically effective response. Einstein’s rhetorical purpose was to elaborate how scientists perceive scientific and religious elucidations.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays