Preview

The Ccj Jamica Final Appellate Court for/Against

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ccj Jamica Final Appellate Court for/Against
JAMAICA runs to make CCJ final court of appeal!
Rate: 1Flag
-------------------------------------------------
Top of Form
Click "Submit Abuse" if you feel this post is inappropriate. Explain why below if you wish.

Cancel
Bottom of Form
Should the Caribbean Court of Justice become the final court of appeal for Jamaica?
The ongoing lobby for the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) to become the final court of appeal for Jamaica has become a conflict of great interest to many Jamaicans and members of the Privy Council. The relevant authorities are yet to make their decision as to whether or not they should leave the Privy Council and make the Caribbean Court of Justice the final court of appeal. It leaves the question lingering on the table “should the Caribbean Court of Justice become the final court of appeal for Jamaica?” in response to this contradicting yet interesting topic critiques will argue ‘yes’ while critiques will argue ‘no’, but what really do you think? Are there any rooted factual reasons to support those who are in opposition of allowing the CCJ to become the final court of appeal for us? With this topic I will be putting forward factual information for both motions (for and against) leaving you to take you final stance on this interesting matter.
Why stopping us from allowing the CCJ to become the final court of appeal? 'Wanted: A new court of appeal' was how The Gleaner published an article by E.C.L. Parkinson, a barrister, expressing his dissatisfaction with the administration of justice in 1950.
Almost 60 years later, another call for a new court of appeal is being made by David Coore, QC, in The Sunday Gleaner (October 18, 2009), repeating the call he says that was first made in 1988 for a Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ). But in a long drawn-out dispute, in and out of court, there is no expression of dissatisfaction with the existing administration, nor is there a call for improving the conditions for the delivery of justice in Jamaica.
It is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Individuals overlook the importance of legal history because the central emphasis is on the current state of law. It is vital to recognize that today’s equitable judicial system was not formed through one rapid notion but rather many unconventional propositions extending over a period of…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palko Case Summary

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    courts of the United States. As the times change and cases are reviewed, the ruling for a…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |A prosecutor is an attorney who has been elected or|The prosecution plays a very important role in the |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For a “brutal, cowardly attack” on a 27-year-old man, run over and left for dead, Agustin Caruso pleaded guilty to manslaughter Monday and was sentenced to 8 1/2 years in prison.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton focuses on three subjects in this paper. First, the process of appointing judges. Second, the tenure which they are to hold their places. Lastly, the judiciary authority among different courts and their relationship (Hamilton p.1). This paper examines the justification for their tenure, meaning the appointment for life under a good behavior. Once comparing the three branches, Hamilton discusses the judiciary as the least dangerous to the political rights of the constitution because it does not have the force or the will (Hamilton p.2). He explains force as decisions made by the court that can only be implemented by the executive branch. Will is the fact that courts are not able to interpret the law according to their desires or political views. By making this comparison, Hamilton makes the first important point in this paper, the terms of office should be appointed to life to protect the judiciary from the other stronger branches of government (Hamilton p.2). His second point is regarding the limited constitution that gives enumerated powers to the federal government.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Happy that it has been bestowed on you at this time..May your tenure in office be a…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jamaica is a constitutional parliamentary democracy. The fusion of United States and England's governments is apparent simply from this name, with democracy relating to the U.S. and the parliament…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If you have read the story in the bible, explaining the lives of the Israelites , you can see some similarities in Jamaica’s history timeline. They have dealt with many rulers in their country’s era and still haven’t been able to fall back on a positive government. Their history holds horrifying massacres involving deaths of many innocent casualties. This once beautiful country now has become a struggle of survival. Jamaica had many hardships while Britain colonized the country, but now conditions have worsened and some Jamaicans are saying they would rather still be living under Britain’s rule.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essentially the judiciary thrives as a noteworthy system that has been rooted in British history for numerous years. It substantiates to be an efficient system that functions smoothly. So much so that other countries have been influenced to directly copy the system in Britain, many countries are still changing and evolving their current systems to meet the needs of their societies. The British judiciary is widely regarded as one of the best and most independent systems in the world. However the question pondered recently is how independent and neutral is the British judiciary?…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chief Justice John Marshall was put in an interesting situation, as he was now responsible for overseeing Marbury’s petition to the court regarding those same commissions. Chief Justice Marshall decided that Marbury did have the right to the writ for which he had petitioned and that the laws of the United States allowed the courts to grant Marbury this writ. Marshall however ordered that the writ could not be granted because Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which granted the court the power to order such a writ was unconstitutional. Chief Justice Marshall exhibited how Congress had overstepped its authority in Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, and used the opportunity to declare the Supreme Court’s responsibility to uphold the constitution.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Copy and Paste

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The argument that is postulated to be argued can therefore be rephrased as; a system that has no custom duties, quota, embargo which imposes a legal binding between African Caribbean and other countries in the Pacific to extend to the European Commission Strategically any treatment negotiate with third parties is of high quality standard to the Jamaican Economy, hence the society at large.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Edward v. State case leads to the development of a legal tussle to justify self representation as part of the accused’s constitutional rights. After undergoing evaluation by two psychiatrists, Ahmad Edwards got diagnosed with schizophrenia and as a result a declaration was taken…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As in the mentioned introduction, CCRC is the statutory body charge with investigating alleged and suspected miscarriages of justice and referring them back to the Court of Appeal if “it thought that there is a ‘real possibility’ that the case will not upheld or alternatively” (The Guardian, March 2012). Both the legislation and previous cases have shown the Commission does not apply a test of guilt or innocence, yet the likelihood that the Court of Appeal would doubt the safety of the conviction.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dual Citizenship

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution of Jamaica, the supreme law of the land has been around since December 1966. The Constitution clearly states that citizens who intend to hold a position in parliament should not hold dual citizenship with another country. Persons arguing that the Constitution should be changed to allow these citizens to take part in the running of the country. Careful thought went into the writing of the Constitution. If the Constitution is amended now to allow this change, it will only be opening doors for others to constitute other changes.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays