Preview

Hamilton's Position Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
217 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hamilton's Position Paper
Hamilton focuses on three subjects in this paper. First, the process of appointing judges. Second, the tenure which they are to hold their places. Lastly, the judiciary authority among different courts and their relationship (Hamilton p.1). This paper examines the justification for their tenure, meaning the appointment for life under a good behavior. Once comparing the three branches, Hamilton discusses the judiciary as the least dangerous to the political rights of the constitution because it does not have the force or the will (Hamilton p.2). He explains force as decisions made by the court that can only be implemented by the executive branch. Will is the fact that courts are not able to interpret the law according to their desires or political views. By making this comparison, Hamilton makes the first important point in this paper, the terms of office should be appointed to life to protect the judiciary from the other stronger branches of government (Hamilton p.2). His second point is regarding the limited constitution that gives enumerated powers to the federal government.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    *Hamilton suggested Congress consider ways to “render the constitution of the federal government adequate to the experiences of the union”…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the American Revolution the citizens of the United States were split between two groups, a loose construction and a strict construction. A loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, meaning that congress has powers beyond those specifically given in the Constitution. A strict construction is A narrow interpretation of the Constitution , meaning that congress has only those powers specifically given in the Constitution. Jefferson was a Republican and wanted a strict construction while Hamilton was a Federalist and wanted a loose construction. Jefferson thought that everything Hamilton did when wanting to make the country better would put them on the verge of the country ending.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1786 Alexander Hamilton called for a Constitutional Convention to discuss the lack of a central government and to fix the Articles of Confederation. The colonies were told to send delegates to the convention. The 55 delegates met, they were composed of merchants, farmers, lawyers and crafters. They were supposed to fix the Articles of Confederation but they decided to create a whole new document and call it the Constitution. This new government would have three branches the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. They also designed a system of Checks and Balances that would make sure that no branch would become too strong. They also made the Constitution able to be changed if necessary. Not all the delegates were professional people they were…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton's Vision

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What was Hamilton’s vision for the new United States? What policies did he implement to achieve it? How was Jefferson’s vision different? (204-207)…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton the Revolution is a book full of many things. War, violence, love, hate, brilliance and idiocy. These are just a few of the many topics and ideas covered in the massive doorstop of a book that is Hamilton. Although it is a wonderful book, I don’t think I would want to live through it. War is glorified by many characters in the play, including Hamilton himself, but I really cannot see war as anything but a horrific waste. I would be stuck in the middle of bloodbath, forced to pick a side. Although I do see the reasoning behind those who revolted, I’m not sure I would want to risk my life and livelihood just to avoid taxation. This would be an unpopular opinion though, and I would be looked down upon by many. I would not want to live…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton’s writing, “The Federalists Papers No. 68,” Hamilton argues that the president should be democratically chosen through representatives of each state. Each state should have the same amount of votes as they have senators and representatives. The delegates should be able to decide between candidates and know their qualifications for the job. The delegates should meet in their state and tell the national government what their decision is. In order for the candidate to be elected they must have a majority of votes: if there is not a majority then the House of Representatives will decide who will be president. The Vice President is the candidate who has the second highest amount of votes. The Vice President will be the presiding…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will argue the Supreme Court from 1790 until 1857 emerged as the most powerful branch in several ways: some history of the early Supreme Court, the emergence of a strong super star, discussion of the landmark cases that illustrate their power, and end with a remarkable decision rendered by the Supreme Court in 1857.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recusal Study Essay

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The subject of recusal is not the most studied issue either. Much of the literature available and some used here is related to recusal but not necessarily the primary focus. It is still relevant and clearly connects though, and this study will illustrate that. For example, much of the history and background of the study is the same for a variety of subjects written about the Supreme Court. Terms of Engagement by Clark M. Neilly III claims that the Supreme Court’s actions restrict the constitutional theory of limited government.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays