Nova Science Now: Are killers born or made? Peering inside the criminal mind, can scientists help when someone died? Mr. Jackson, who’s a biologist, says “some men carry DNA that’s more violent than others. This gene is called MOA gene, its nickname is the warrior gene, we all carry it some more than others. Your Amygdala telling the rest of your body that something is happening. People with MOA genes have less grey matter than others but it’s not enough to make them aggressive, DNA is only one piece of the puzzle.…
There are gender differences in criminal behavior solely based up genetic makeup. Gottfedson and Hirschi’s theory provides two facts that make me believe that males are more criminogenic than females. First, as stated in the theory, females are less likely to commit crime because they have higher levels of self control. Second, parents tend to be more vigilant in monitoring girls than boys parents are likely to be more consistent in the application of parental management with girls than boys. Both of these factors I find to be extremely true, especially when dealing with self control. In general, males have more testosterone than females and are more likely to let their emotions get the best of them. When talking about crime I could see how…
Criminologist David Rowe was one of the primary leaders in a movement to bring the discussion of biology back to criminal justice which occurred in the late 1990's before this both biological and individual traits were largely ignored by criminologists. Now biological and individual traits are influential in large part due to Rowe whom published a book titled “Biology in Crime” in 2002. In this work Rowe contends that genetic factors affect individual traits due to their impact on the central nervous system and autonomic nervous system and that their is a physiological relation to a heightened amount of violence when these systems are thrown off and their is evidence that criminals may have deficits in the per-frontal cortex of the brain and their is an association between low…
The first factor is brain damage. “ … This depends on when the damage occurs, it is a very precise thing. All of the killers and psychopaths had damage to their orbital cortex, right above the eyes.” All of the brains that Mr. Fallon looked at had this in common. The second factor is genetics, there is actually a gene for violence, MAOA. This gene is only on the X chromosome so it is passed from mothers. This is why men tend to be more aggressive because in females this gene is diluted . However this factor leads to the next factor. “In order for boys to show this gene they have to go through something really traumatic usually before puberty.” Fallon goes on to say that “ Either being involved or seeing violence...so, if you have this gene and you see a lot of violence it could be a recipe for disaster.”…
Is crime caused by brain malfunction? Most efforts to fight crime focuses on sociological approaches like counseling, and rehabilitation. It also includes better parenting and education to prevent at risk children from becoming delinquents and criminals. These are good approaches but fail to acknowledge one thing. Most criminals suffer from brain dysfunction. Research has shown this dysfunction is the leading cause of dyslogic, which is lack of insight and foresight. They also show a lack of empathy, low anger threshold, poor social skills, and lack of remorse. They show no fear and do not realize consequences to their actions (CT, 2008). Some of this can be attributed to their genes. Geneticists claim that human behavior is the result of gene-environment interaction, meaning that behavior results from both genetic and…
This is a statement that researches have long sought the answer for, it all boils down to nature versus nurture. Is there a clear answer? I can honestly say now that I do not believe so, after evaluating both sides I see that nature and nurture seem to play an almost even role. Therefore, I do no think it is fair to determine this question with a yes or no answer, instead I hope to present the facts and allow others to make a judgment based on those. When beginning my research I had the advantage of working with top psychiatrists in my area to try and determine the cause of criminal behavior, and I realized very quickly that there are two very convincing opposing sides and no…
What makes people do inexplicable, terrible, socially unacceptable acts of violence? This question brings to mind the age old psychological theory, Nature vs. Nurture. Are people born predisposed for violence? Is there something genetically different about serial killers and murderers? Can their behavior be explained by a difference in their very make-up? Or are they made violent by seeing violence, having un-supportive and demanding parents, being mentally, sexually, and physically abused? Nature vs. nurture is one of the most sought after answers in the field of psychology and may never be “answered” but can be “understood” I feel study in the minds of serial killers has helped to define exactly what nature vs. nurture really means.…
Recent reports in science have found discrete locations in the brain that are used in intricate systems that serve as the human moral compass (1).Changes in the brain have long been known to change the behaviors of a man. In the famous example of Phineas Gage, an accident at his job caused an iron rod to pierce through Gage's skull. Gage was able to stand and speak a few moments later. His intelligence was intact, but it soon became clear that this once model young man had been changed by the incident. He now cursed, lied and behaved horribly to people around them. Gage's doctor, John Harlow, said that…
People who have this gene mutation are at extremely high risk for violent crimes. What makes researcher believe that killers tend to have this gene is not because they kill, but because of how violent this gene can make a person. Although this gene plays a great factor on killers and their crimes. Physical and emotional abuse as a young child also plays in. Research from the Department of Justice shows that children who are exposed to violence, being a witness or victim are often affected with long-term physical, psychological, and emotional damage. Children exposed abuse like this are at a greater risk of engaging in criminal behavior later as an adult and continuing this type of abuse to their…
(Brogaard). In contrast to sociopathy, psychopathy is widely considered to be a heritable condition. Thus serial killers could possibly inhered the genetic disposition to have a lack of emotions that would otherwise inhibit homicidal actions, supporting the idea that serial murderers may be born rather than made. A study conducted in 2005 at the University of Minnesota…
The debate regarding criminality being a result of nature or nurture has been a topic of discussion both within criminology and outside of it for decades. Criminologists brought forward theories attempting to address and explain this paradox, and explanations for crime included psychological, sociological, economical, biological reasons, amongst…
There are two schools of thought, one that serial killers are born with certain genes that create homicidal tendencies in them and second that they commit a series of murders because of a particular environment (abusive family, abandonment, etc.) they are exposed to as children. Both arguments have been proved and explained through research and have been supported by statistics. However, it is seen that neither of the two are individually able to answer why serial killers behave in the manner they do. A thorough review of the research, statistics and what experts have to say in this matter will show that it is a mix of genetic and environmental factors that influence a serial killer. It is true that children who are victims of violence and abuse may become violent as they grow up to become adults but this does not mean they will become serial killers. It is necessary here that one is born with a genetic disorder and is also brought up in an environment that triggers the person with a genetic disorder to commit mass murders. Serial killers do not usually develop from a healthy mind after being subjected to a series of environmental factors, but are rather born with a set of bio-psychological characteristics that make them vulnerable to engage in extreme violence and sadism only after…
When it comes to the use of violence in organized crime, crime is and always has been an intricate and calculated part of organized crime. Violence against other crime families and gangs to control territories has always been first and foremost when speaking about organized crime families and gangs. Violence is also used to intimidate any potential witnesses in the neighborhoods where organized crime families and gangs conduct illegal businesses as a way to in sure that no one has an idea to come forward as a witness. Some examples of the violence within the Stanfa regime came after John stanfa took over the Philly mob” and engaged in an all out street war with a younger faction led by Joseph “Skinny Joey” Merlino.…
Biological theories of crime causation follow the principle that many behavioral tendencies, including aggression and criminality, are constitutionally or physiologically influenced. Most of the usual sociological suspect would have come from a broken or abusive home, is a part of a family below the poverty or has a parent who is convicted criminal. All of these examples support the biological theories and most of the time people living in those conditions are more susceptible to…
Appelbaum, P. S., (2005). Behavioral Genetics and the Punishment of Crime. Law and Psychiatry, 56 (1), 25-27.…