Preview

Serial Killers: Nature Vs. Nurture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Serial Killers: Nature Vs. Nurture
What makes people do inexplicable, terrible, socially unacceptable acts of violence? This question brings to mind the age old psychological theory, Nature vs. Nurture. Are people born predisposed for violence? Is there something genetically different about serial killers and murderers? Can their behavior be explained by a difference in their very make-up? Or are they made violent by seeing violence, having un-supportive and demanding parents, being mentally, sexually, and physically abused? Nature vs. nurture is one of the most sought after answers in the field of psychology and may never be “answered” but can be “understood” I feel study in the minds of serial killers has helped to define exactly what nature vs. nurture really means. The …show more content…
Tests have shown that the nervous systems of psychopaths encounter less fear and anxiety than normal people. Tests have proven that low arousal levels have caused these individuals to project impulsive thrill-seeking behavior. Proven by one experiment, a group of healthy individuals and a group of serial killers were given the task of finding which lever out of four turned on a green light. One of the levers gave the subject an electric shock. Though both groups made the same number of mistakes the sociopaths took much longer in learning to stay away from the lever with the electric shock. This higher need for stimulation leads these individuals to seek dangerous situations. In fact most serial killers have a desire to become cops, the intensity of the job makes it exciting and desirable to them. The famous serial killer John Wyane Gacy, responsible for the rape and murder of 33 teenage boys and young men, told …show more content…
These statistics illustrate the idea that nature rarely operates without nurture. Dr. J. Reid Meloy, author of The Psychopathic Mind: Origins, Dynamics, and Treatment, states “the psychopath is only capable of sadomasochistic relationships based on power, not attachment. Psychopaths identify with the aggressive role model, such as an abusive parent, and attack the weaker, more vulnerable self by projecting it onto others.” Dr. Meloy goes even further by saying that these environmental factors can hold sway over the predisposed, genetically different mind of the serial killer in infancy. An infant will start to look inward for after experiencing too many neglectful and painful experiences. In normal development a child bonds with the mother figure for nurturing and love, for a psychopath the mother is often seen as an “aggressive predator or a passive stranger.” This can be because she is overbearing and too protective, or because perhaps the father is abusive and she does nothing to intervene. Of course there are a plethora of reasons this could happen to the developing child, those are just a few examples. The father figure in a serial killers environment looms large too as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Serial Killer Mind

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Inside the mind of a Serial Killer and the current biological differences between our minds and that of a serial killer.…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their studies had even fewer participants than Macdonald’s original study; the FBI only used 36 murderers, 25 of which were serial killers, and no non-violent criminals as controls. Even with this small amount of data theories were developed and articles published. They did, however, add some subject background data that may provide further clues to predictors. They found most, three quarts, had single and/or indifferent parents growing up, three quarters had atypical sexual desires, and that three quarters had been abused (Brice,…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some serial killers share the same driving forces; others are completely different from one another. These driving forces can be observed and analyzed on an individual and familial level. These can be described as very small groups which fall under the category of microstructure in sociology. Many serial killers are motivated by anger and want to take it out on their victims. Jeffery Dahmer had a much different driving force for the crimes he committed. Levin stated in an article that Jeffrey Dahmer is said to have been motivated by a different desire, he wanted the company of his victims (as cited in Geis, 2008). Jeffrey Dahmer did this so that he could build intimate relationships with his victims that he was not able to build with other individuals. This intimate relationship with the victims is what drove serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer to kill. In another article, serial killer Dennis Rader explained what caused him to commit all of his crimes. Radar uses sexual fantasy to account for the motivation behind (and justification for) many of his crimes and specific actions.” (Bartels & Parsons,…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first factor is brain damage. “ … This depends on when the damage occurs, it is a very precise thing. All of the killers and psychopaths had damage to their orbital cortex, right above the eyes.” All of the brains that Mr. Fallon looked at had this in common. The second factor is genetics, there is actually a gene for violence, MAOA. This gene is only on the X chromosome so it is passed from mothers. This is why men tend to be more aggressive because in females this gene is diluted . However this factor leads to the next factor. “In order for boys to show this gene they have to go through something really traumatic usually before puberty.” Fallon goes on to say that “ Either being involved or seeing violence...so, if you have this gene and you see a lot of violence it could be a recipe for disaster.”…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The relentless debate about the effects of nature and nurture in determining a psychopath presents two very convincing sides of the story that have resulted in a ‘deadlock’ in the debate. This is because many scientists; presented with a range of conflicting research have settled on the conclusion that both nature and nurture play a contributing role in shaping a so-called psychopath.…

    • 6712 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Think of serial killer. Does he kill because it is in his genes? No matter what his parents did to raise him; he would have been a violent, serial killer no matter what. On the other hand, did his environment shape him to be a serial killer? Such as, his parent’s did not pay him enough attention, or he was abused as a child. Nature and nurture are factors that have come to be recognized as playing or interacting roles in development.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These factors are biological, i.e. high testosterone hormone level or using substances, pathologies such as Autism or Attention Deflect Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), film industry, social learning that become a criminal or be a serial killer can be learnt by observation and applying a reinforcement, developmental process and social environment like education level or availability of the crime. In my point of view, there is no only one important factor which plays in a role in regards to be a serial killer in light of the fact that these all factors depend on the each other. For example, both one person has a childhood problem and is impacted by one serial killers film e.g. he/she was isolated from their friends and as a consequence of that he/she feel alone and neglected. Following this, he watched one serial killers film who killed his/her friend because of the fact that they were ridiculed with the serial killer and he was both affected by the factors. In addition to this, serial killers come from our society so that all humans have a potential to become a serial killer. What is more, on the occasion of looking at these factors, serial killers not only are not insane people but also are not responsible for their actions. In my opinion, I believe that society, traumatic experience and biological factors result in being a serial killers. Therefore, they do not have their autonomy.…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We have been looking at the Nature vs Nurture debate in psychology and how it can be applied to Serial Killers. In class we also looked at the ways nature and nurture effected how Colin Jackson and found that it was a combination of the two arguments. I believe that it may be similarly a combination of both sides of the argument that lead a person to becoming a serial killer.…

    • 4775 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ted Bundy

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Serial killings are considered one of the most terrifying and violent crimes in the United States. The majority of serial killers commit their murders over a considerable period of time; Ted Bundy’s murder spree lasted for years. Sometimes these crimes are years apart. Serial killers are usually white males of at least average intelligence who target a certain type of victim, and the crimes are committed in similar places each time. In most cases they fall into one of two major classes of serial killers: psychotic and psychopathic. Most serial killers are considered psychopathic, meaning that they are in touch with reality and know the difference between right and wrong. The major difference they have from regular people is that they lack a conscience, or it is too weak to prevent them from doing something wrong, so they kill without feeling guilt or remorse. Some experts believe that a psychopathic killer can be born through genetics, being born with a predisposition to kill. Other experts believe this type of personality develops due to environmental factors, such as some type of abuse during their upbringing. Many experts also believe that this type of killer results from a combination of genetics and environment. Ted Bundy is considered a psychopathic serial killer. Serial killers are relatively rare in the community of killers, and sexually motivated serial killers are even rarer. This makes Ted Bundy an individual with a rare type of personality, but he seemed normal to all that knew him.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serial killing as a phenomenon has been apart of the United States’ history for many years. Serial killers have been typically defined as individuals who have murdered a minimum of three to four people over a period of time with a ‘cooling off’ period between each murder (Wittington-Egan, 2008). There are various theories that give insight into why individuals become serial killers. One of the most prevalent theories being the idea that psychological disorders contribute to one’s likeliness to kill, the most frequent being antisocial personality disorder. Furthermore, through copious amounts of research, one can conclude that the population at the highest risk of becoming serial killers is males diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Serial Killers Do Exist

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In trying to figure out the theory as to how a child grows up to become a serial killer is much more complicated than childhood neglect, abuse, mental illness, or brain injury. One particular pattern that seems to stand out amongst serial killers is severe childhood neglect. During a child’s development, under normal circumstances, they learn love, trust, empathy, and basic knowledge of interacting with other human beings. A child…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aided by brain scans (MRI), scientists have found that psychopaths have significant brain impairments, which are decreased amount of grey matter in the brain responsible for processing empathy, moral reasoning and guilt that clearly affect their ability to feel emotions, and to react to other people’s distress. Also, other studies have linked the amygdala with psychopathic traits as this area is related to aggressive behavior. Abnormalities in other parts of the brain such as the orbitofrontal cortex have also been correlated to psychopathy, as this area is responsible for lying, irresponsibility, and lack of emotion. Brain scans have also shown that psychopaths (with mean, aggressive, rude attitude) have more activity in the part of the brain related to the expectation of rewards. Other than physical brain abnormalities, genes could also be playing a role on psychopathic behavior (monster-like behavior such as merciless killing, torturing, cannibalism, etc.). Psychopaths can also be considered as “natural born predators” as they tend to sense emotions such as fear accurately. Apart from biology, social upbringing can also be playing a role in psychopath’s lives. In fact, violent upbringing can contribute to psychopathic traits. However, psychopathic traits cannot be explained with simply one factor or another; it is a combination of biological traits, social traits, personal psychology and biochemical traits that are combined to explain psychopathic behavior. According to Dr. Robert Hare, the percentage of psychopaths in Canada goes up to 1% of the total population. One important distinction to make is that psychopaths are not necessarily murderous creatures. In fact, many of them may not even be criminals. However, people with lack of emotions, feelings, remorse or concern for other’s well being do tend to contribute to destroyed lives.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many theories as to why people become serial killers. Almost all of these concepts are associated with the Nature vs. Nurture theory. Are serial killers born with the need to kill, or is it something that they learn to long for as they grew up? Many believe that the nurture theory is the likely concept to believe; that serial killers are created from bad childhood experiences including being abused by their parents, or molested at an early age. Psychologist and sociologist have interviewed serial killers and picked apart their minds, to find out what it is that makes them feel the need to perform these heinous crimes. It is the nature theory that they are looking for when they examine a brain. They are looking for some sort of a defect within their brain that would account for the actions that they did. A goal of the psychologist is to use the information they find, to be able to discover how to determine who is, or who will become a serial killer, before they kill anyone so that they can get proper treatment. Many serial killers do not show any attributes that they are going to become murderers. They live normal lives like the majority of the children in the world, like going to school, making good grades, and have a loving family. However, there are a few who will start to show signs of abnormal behavior, such as arson, and cruelty to animals. Looking into the lives of Jeffrey Dahmer, and Ted Bundy, who were both some of the world’s most notorious serial killers, will give a better insight to how they came to be serial killers; was it always in their blood, or was it something that occurred within their childhood that provoked their behavior?…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I watched the video about the Biology of Crime and Violence. In the video Adrian Raine talks about the biological factors affecting whether or not someone will become a violent criminal. He states that there isn’t exactly a killer gene but there are genes that predisposed or raise the odds that someone will become a violent criminal. After doing studies on twins it was found that 50% of the cause of crime antisocial behavior can be related to genes. Some of the risk factors are prenatal smoking, prenatal drinking, malnutrition and a low resting heart rate. A statistic that stood out to me from the video was that 90% of homicides are committed by men. They have also found the prefrontal cortex to be reduced in men which is what controls anger,…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though both sides of the argument have evidence to verify both, they do not necessarily disprove the other side of the argument Even within the different biological components that potentially make up a serial killer, it is not probable that you can differ from which of these have contributed to the makings of the serial killer. Perhaps they all have an equal input? The same goes for the environmental factors. Though we can try to use neuroscience and family history to find out whether someone has the potential to become a serial killer, it does not necessarily mean that someone will become a serial killer. Maybe there are other factors which have not yet been regarded that could have an effect on becoming a serial killer. Criminologists have assigned three warning signs which they have dubbed ‘The Macdonald Triad’: Enuresis (bed wetting), animal cruelty and fire-setting (Ramsland, 2012). However, these warnings signs, especially enuresis, can arise in any child and so they are not strong predictions for a serial killers. Though it is said that if bed wetting is continued after 12 years old, then it could be a sign of something deeper. In the future, it might become possible to predict if a child will become a serial killer, but for now, something like this is not…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays