Preview

Thank You for Arguing Reading Logs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thank You for Arguing Reading Logs
Vincent Nguyen
8/15/11
Pg. 1

Chapter 1 Entry

“…rhetoric offers a grander, metaphysical payoff: it jolts you into a fresh new perspective on the human condition. After it awakens you to the argument all around, the world will never seem the same.” (6)

In chapter one, “Open Your Eyes,” Heinrichs states that argument is an important social element that surrounds everyday life. People who uses rhetoric, the art of argument, tends to succeed in persuading others to do their bidding. Many powerful politicians today mastered this tool. The most toughest arguments can be won with this art. Rhetoric has helped mankind develop complex societies, codes, and laws. “Every one of America’s founders studied rhetoric, and they used its principles in writing the Constitution (4)”. An example of someone using rhetoric effectively is a U.S. president attempting to persuade the citizens to vote for him. The president’s goal is to “manipulate” or “seduce” the voters into thinking that voting for him may be the best choice for the country. This may lead to a consensus about who will be the leader of America. To win the election, however, the candidates must persuade the people with an elaborate speech. The best speeches tends to have rhetorical devices. Former President John F. Kennedy was very good at speeches since he used rhetoric effectively by using devices such as chiasmus.
"Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind." - JFK

8/15/11
Chapter 2 Entry

“You succeed in an argument when you persuade your audience. You win a fight when you dominate the enemy.” (16)

In chapter two, “Set Your Goals,” the author talks about setting a goal and the difference between arguing and fighting. Fighting is someone trying to dominate the opponent with aggression. Arguing is someone trying to persuade the opponent with speech. Many people fail to realize the distinctive line between the two. Fighting does not persuade , it only

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When assessing the situation or argument you are in, you have to use practical wisdom to be considered a sensible person to your audience. In order to get the audience to trust you, you may consider showing off your experience, bending the rules, and taking the middle…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This chapter distinguished the difference between a fight and an argument. In an example, he used a study based on married couples. The couples whose marriage succeeded argued, the marriages that didn’t last long, fought. The difference is that in a fight, you want to win. In an argument, you want to achieve a goal. For the persuader to do his job, he needs to set a goal. In order to achieve his goal, he needs to change audience’s mood, mind, and willingness.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “What a cruel thing war is... to fill our hearts with hatred instead of love for our neighbors.”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. In order to argue effectively, the arguer must first set a personal goal, and then play an active role in setting the goals of the “audience”.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sanctions law is full of traps for the unwary or the uninitiated. Knowing the rules of the game—and following them—is…

    • 7023 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing. This is especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques. There are also many rhetoric elements to this story. I will explain just a few of the many rhetoric elements in this essay.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This chapter is the most important because the introduction of Aristotle’s top three tools in an argument, logos, ethos and pathos is introduced. He calls them “ The most powerful tools of persuasion: Argument by character, argument by logic, and argument by emotion” (38) also known as logos, ethos and pathos for short. By using emotion, logic and character it makes it easier to manipulate someone in an argument. For example, in Heinrich words “ Logos, ethos, and pathos appeal to the brain, gut, and heart of your audience” (40) which means that these tools are part of argument for persuasion to others. Heinrich explains how to use these tools by explaining in detail by definition and divides them individually in sections to go further in depth in the chapter. This chapter is useful by allowing the readers to fulfill themselves in further knowledge by using argument tools to spice up an argument and win it over.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) An argument should be focused on winning over an audience rather than beating them…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Situation

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When one hears the word Rhetorical Situation, they may tend to be confused, because Rhetoric theory isn’t nessacarily a situation, but much more complex than that. If you look at the word Rhetoric, it’s function is ultimately to perform a task by altering or changing the world we live in. rhetoric, can be seen as a manner of changing reality, not directly by the energy of oneself to others, but by creating discourse, in which causes, or persuades others to become so engaged that they facilitate change. In is apperant that rhetoric is always persuasive and convincing. Rhetorical situation can be beheld as a natural perspective of persons, events, objects, and relations. There are three different construients of any rhetorical situation which are exigence, Audience and contraints. Exigence is a sense of urgency or the obstacle that is in need of being overcame and completed. An exigence is rhetorical when it is capable of positive modification which requires discourse or can be assisted by discourse. The audience is whom the individual is trying to sway, and will greatly affect, their dialect, content, and overall angle. Contraint have the ability to limit decisions and actions needed to modify the exigence. Standard sources of constraint include beliefs, attitudes, documents, facts, traditions, images, interests, and motives. A speaker at a democratic rally wouldn’t share their favorable views for the republican party. Likewise a monologue for a talk show would not run longer than five minutes.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    English

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “In the argument culture, criticism, attack, or opposition are the predominant if not the only ways of…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective Arguments

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many important events in our nation's history were influenced by persuasive arguments. Many sides have gained support due to the writings or speeches gave by an effective speaker. These arguments take a lot to be effective. There are three key components, and if an argument lacks any one of them, it is not effective. Organization, diction, and bias words are all important aspects to any effective argument. Using these three elements, Thomas Paine was able to make a triumphant case, whereas James Chalmers' writing did not and was therefore ineffective.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Huntington, Sameul. "The Clash of Civilizations." The Aims of Argument: A Text and Reader. 5th ed. Eds. Timothy Crusius and Carolyn Channell. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2005. 350-354.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fighting for Our Lives

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deborah Tannen argues that we have an “argument culture,” due to the idea that we repeatedly think of human interaction as battles, in the metaphorical sense. This appears to be a critical observation of our habitual use of war metaphors in our society. Tannen suggests that the argument culture urges us to think in a very adversarial manner that our conversations are usually set up to be a debate. Many of us believe that our society has a very binary thinking. In essence, we always think of the right and wrong, good and bad, black and white. We understand the language is a battleground and we know that words are powerful that they shape our perception.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Triumph of the Yell

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In her essay, Triumph of the Yell, written in 1994, Deborah Tannen details the truths about public discourse in a well organized and factual manner. She makes a forceful claim that public discourse has degenerated into verbal fist-fights which are not effective in problem solving. She exemplifies her statements with facts and personal experiences. She also applies the universal intellectual standards of clarity, depth, accuracy, logic and fairness. With this thought provoking essay, Tannen exposes the dangers of continuing this confrontational style of public discourse and suggests a more thoughtful and compromising approach to solve problems.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays