Tgif Case Analysis Form
TGIF Case Analysis Form
PROBLEMS: a. Macro:
There are a various opinions on whether or not the “beer bust” is a suitable tool of rewarding the company’s stuff or worker. Stan and Erin, they establish Quantum Software, feel that this time is beneficial because it gives a chance to “encourage the team concept” (Brown & Harvey, 1995). Bill however, after witnessing an employee stumbling as a result of his drinking, questions the company’s conditions of providing alcohol during the workday.
b. Micro:
The micro issue is that coworkers see each other the same with management stuff in an intoxicated state; creating a situation where professional integrity could be compromised.
Causes:
The cause for the struggle is that the company offering its employees alcohol during work and that creates a situation where Quantum would be held liable should an accident occur at work or as the stuff was leaving the office. In addition concerns are guaranteed in considering that not all stuff will be included in an event where drinking alcohol is involved (NZMA, 2006).
Systems Affected: 1. Quantum had a lot of success in the previous years of its While that is a positive point it comes with some responsibilities. Such as keeping up on staffing cases. 2. Quantum seems highly under staffed and is asking for 16 work hour days, 6 days per a week. The over loaded employee gave Erin, one of the owners an idea as these individuals need to blow off some steam after these horribly long weeks Quantum is asking them to work. 3. Another reason for their current situation concerning the beer bust Friday is Erin was its convincer. She believes has a vested and seems to be bias interest in keeping beer bust Fridays despite the danger it lends to the institution.
Alternatives:
Quantum could ask every worker to do a breathalyzer test and sign a waiver before going home, leaving no liability to Quantum. Another example of alternatives is to their current
PROBLEMS: a. Macro:
There are a various opinions on whether or not the “beer bust” is a suitable tool of rewarding the company’s stuff or worker. Stan and Erin, they establish Quantum Software, feel that this time is beneficial because it gives a chance to “encourage the team concept” (Brown & Harvey, 1995). Bill however, after witnessing an employee stumbling as a result of his drinking, questions the company’s conditions of providing alcohol during the workday.
b. Micro:
The micro issue is that coworkers see each other the same with management stuff in an intoxicated state; creating a situation where professional integrity could be compromised.
Causes:
The cause for the struggle is that the company offering its employees alcohol during work and that creates a situation where Quantum would be held liable should an accident occur at work or as the stuff was leaving the office. In addition concerns are guaranteed in considering that not all stuff will be included in an event where drinking alcohol is involved (NZMA, 2006).
Systems Affected: 1. Quantum had a lot of success in the previous years of its While that is a positive point it comes with some responsibilities. Such as keeping up on staffing cases. 2. Quantum seems highly under staffed and is asking for 16 work hour days, 6 days per a week. The over loaded employee gave Erin, one of the owners an idea as these individuals need to blow off some steam after these horribly long weeks Quantum is asking them to work. 3. Another reason for their current situation concerning the beer bust Friday is Erin was its convincer. She believes has a vested and seems to be bias interest in keeping beer bust Fridays despite the danger it lends to the institution.
Alternatives:
Quantum could ask every worker to do a breathalyzer test and sign a waiver before going home, leaving no liability to Quantum. Another example of alternatives is to their current