Preview

Tennessee V Garner

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tennessee V Garner
The Supreme Court has made many decisions about police conduct but very few have had the impact on all of law enforcement as that of Tennessee vs. Garner. This landmark case has set very clear lines as when an officer of the law may use deadly force on a fleeing suspect. At about 10:45 p. m. on October 3, 1974, Officers of the Memphis Police Department, Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright responded to a "prowler inside call" (FindLaw.com). After arriving at the scene, they saw a woman standing on her porch and motioning toward the house next door. She said that she had heard the sound of glass being shattered and that "they" or "someone" was breaking in the house next door. While Wright radioed the dispatcher saying they were at the scene, Hymon went behind the house. He heard a slamming door and saw someone running across the backyard. The fleeing suspect, Edward Garner, stopped at a 6-feet-high chain link fence ( Justia & Oyez & Forms WorkFlow ). Being able to see Garner 's face and hands, He saw no sign of a weapon and though not certain, was "reasonably sure" and "figured" that Garner was unarmed. Hymon thought Garner was near the age 17 or 18 and around 5 '5" to 5 '7" tall. While Garner crouched at the base of the fence, Hymon identified himself and issued a command to halt taking a few steps toward the suspect. Garner then attempted to climb the fence. Believing that if Garner made it over the fence he would escape capture, Hymon shot him. The bullet hit Garner in the back of the head. Garner was taken by ambulance to a hospital, where he died on the operating table. Ten dollars and a purse taken from the house were found on his body (Biers). By using lethal force to prevent the escape, Hymon was acting under the authority of a Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. The statute provides that if, after notice of the intention to arrest the defendant, he either flee or forcibly resist, the officer may use all the necessary means to effect the


Cited: Justia & Oyez & Forms WorkFlow . supreme.justia.com. 2 March 2009 . Biers, Sam. 4lawschool.com. 13 July 2007. 3 March 2009 . FindLaw.com. FindLaw. 1 March 2009 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The legal issues in this case involved the treatments of Petty, a former Police Officer who left the Metro Police Department for active duty with the United States Army. Upon his request to be reinstated, Petty was not placed in his original position as a patrol sergeant or a similar position based on the completion of the return-to-work form n which he did not disclose all the facts regarding his discharge status. The police department return-to-work process is a policy that is required for all officers to complete if they were away for an extended period of time no matter what the reason for their separation. One of the questions on the personal history questionnaire Plaintiff filled out during the return-to-work process asked: “During your absence were you arrested, charged, detained, or a suspect in any criminal action or military disciplinary action for any reason or do you have any action pending? If yes, explain in detail (use back if necessary).” Petty answered “Yes.” He also attached a narrative explanation of his response in which he admitted facing military charges in Kuwait. The narrative description did not disclose: (1) that Petty was accused of giving alcohol to an enlisted soldier; and (2) that Petty was accused of manufacturing alcohol. Since Petty did not mention facing military charges for manufacturing alcohol while in Kuwait, he was assigned to desk work. (Walsh, 2010, p.348) Under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), as stated in chapter 11 page 346, employers are prohibited from discriminating against member who serves in uniformed military services. It also guarantees the return of a veteran right of reemployment after military service is required to return to their original position or a similar position.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Police officers were in pursuit of a suspected drug dealer, and were led to an apartment complex. The officers ended up outside of a certain apartment, were the smell of marijuana emanated. The police knocked loudly, and from inside the apartment they heard movement, and the police believed that the sounds were an indication that evidence was being destroyed. The police announced their intent to enter the apartment, kicked the door down to find drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain sight, and arrested King and others. They continued to search the apartment and came across other evidence. King argued that due to the officers not having a warrant…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mapp vs. ohio: The surrounding of the case was the police came in her house try to find a bomb suspect they found the bomb suspect but they also found pornograph pics of her self so she was arrested that day. The supreme court's decision was that when a police officer is searching you or your house they have to specify what they are looking for. The courts decision maid a big change because the cops if they come in your house looking for a gun but they find a knife they cant arrest you for it because they have to specify what they are looking for.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978) (“Tennessee Valley Auth v Hill”), it was discussed whether a small endangered fish called the “snail darter” could stop the “intended transformation of the river into a 30 mile long reservoir by building the Tellico Dam. Congress had authorised funding for the project in 1967 to generate hydroelectricity, create recreational opportunities and flood control, and promote shoreline developments.” The question remains, what was the case about? Put simply, it was sustaining an environment and protection of endangered species of a little fish. Wm. Robert Irvin of the President of American River in his article in the Huffington Post stated “It was a fight to save a river, one that was itself endangered and crucial to the lives, livelihoods, and heritage of the people who loved…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    State v Stark

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: Three medical tests performed on Stark; one initial and two consecutive in which resulted in and confirmed a positive diagnosis for the HIV virus.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before 2004, courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have, a handicapped entrance. At this time, it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building, you had to ask someone to carry you in, or even worse, you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years, however, no one addressed it.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the parties involved in this case is Matthew Fraser, high school student, and his father. They are both the respondents, the defendants in the case. The other party was the Bethel School District. The school district is the plaintiff in this case.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbade the death penalty for the crime of rape of a woman. While serving several sentences for rape, kidnapping, one count of first degree murder, and aggravated assault, Ehrlich Anthony Coker escaped from prison. Coker broke into Allen and Elnita Carver's home near Waycross, Georgia, raped Elnita Carver and stole the family's vehicle. Coker was convicted of rape, armed robbery, and the other offenses. He was sentenced to death on the rape charge after the jury found two of the aggravating circumstances present for imposing such a sentence: that the rape was committed by a person with prior convictions for capital felonies, and that the rape was committed in the course of committing another capital felony—the armed robbery. The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld the sentence.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V Garner Essay

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tennessee v. Garner (1985) is based on an incident that took place October 3, 1974. Briefly, the facts of the case are that a Memphis police officer, Elton Hymon, shot and killed an unarmed fifteen year old, Edward Garner, who was fleeing the scene of a home burglary at approximately 10:45 p.m.. The officer identified himself as the police and gave a command to halt. Garner stopped at the base of a chain-link fence, and then began to scale the fence when Hymon fired a shot, striking Garner in the back of the head which resulted in his death later at a local hospital. Hymon testified he saw no sign of a weapon and was “reasonably sure” and “figured” Garner was unarmed and if he scaled the fence, he would get away (Tennessee v. Garner, 1985, App. 41, 56; Record 219). Hymon believed he was justified in shooting Garner as stated in Tennessee Code Annotated 40-7-108 (1982), "[i]f, after notice of the intention to arrest the defendant, he either flee or forcibly resist, the officer may use all the necessary means to effect the arrest" and congruent with department…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Gregg V. Georgia dealt with administrative law, which is the legal field that regulates the due process clause in the Constitution. The clause is about the Government having the obligations to respect and uphold the legal rights of American people during and after they are arrested. Troy Leon Gregg and other inmates on death row believed that the death sentence was in direct violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments, which dealt with cruel and unusual punishment and that states must require due process. Gregg was found guilty for armed robbery, and the murders of two men in 1973. From that the Supreme Court had accepted his death sentence for the charges of murder and not of armed robbery thus being the first man in…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States v. Virginia court case was debated on Jan 17, 1996 at Virginia Military Institute. The advocates involved were Paul Bender, who argued the case for the United States and Theodore B. Olson, who argued the case on behalf of Virginia. The U.S was the petitioner, while Virginia was the accused. According to "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court Case and Opinions.” the case was about Virginia Military Institute violating the fourteenth Amendments of Equal Protection by maintaining a public founded Virginia Military Institute as an all-male institution. According to "United States v. Virginia 518 U.S. 515 (1996)." Justia Law, the intention of the VMI was to create “citizen soldiers”, men who are prepared for leadership in civilian life and in military service. The VMI was trying to train male leaders of the future excluding the females.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon V. Wainwright

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case has a lasting impact on the judicial system of the United States. This case overturned Betts v. Brady, which said that the states had the right to decide if a defendant had the right to counsel. This case also created the large public defender system we have today and the need for public defenders. As one of the most important Supreme Court cases in our nations history, the result of this case is seen everyday. This gives those who are unable…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays