Preview

Teleological Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teleological Argumentative Essay
On the Teleological Argument
McCloskey claims that “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed.” He is implicating that we as humans do not have the full understanding or knowledge of everything about creation. Again, based on anyone arguments, he nor I can prove God, no God, or why everything is here. Even he stated in his article that if people accept the examples of purpose and design we would only be entitled to believe that there is a “powerful” “designer.” Everything he claims to be a weak argument for reasons to believe in God can be turned around towards his arguments. As said earlier I cannot prove God but believe there are many good reasons to rather than not to. He wants indisputable examples (which sounds like proof) of God. While he pushes for evolution that supposedly has undisputable proof. There is problem with this, there is no proof of the first organism or a pattern of evolvement. There is no foundation for this belief of a first organism. Only a theory based on similarity amongst organism. There is nothing that shows clearly an evolving species. If we all evolved why isn’t there any in-between species? Just similar between two completely different. His argument is not reasonable.
An example of design that, while not necessarily “indisputable,” I believe …show more content…
What is good? Who decides what is and is not bad or good? This calls attention to the question; where does morality come from? It’s not natural order in humans because that points to a designer. He believes that due to the evil in the world today it cannot lead to an all perfect being but rather an imperfect being. McCloskey has not disproved God but only raised another question. He has chosen to not agree with this possibility of an imperfect world and a perfect
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"
    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"

    Another problem I found in his philosophy was, throughout his writing, McCloskey talks about how Christians use arguments as “proofs”; however, they are not proofs but merely ideas and arguments that when looked at as a whole, seem to give support to a claim. Since they do not definitively establish a case for God, McCloskey says these arguments should be abandoned. Again, McCloskey seems to think that he knows the inner mind of “most” theistic people and claims that we hold certain ideas or theories as proof. I know quite a few theists; however, I can’t recall ever hearing a single one saying that they have definitive proof of…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'

    I think that in reading the article we can relate to McCloskey in some of his concerns. One can question is the most relatable, the idea that God exist and so does evil. Personally, I have wondered why God would allow such troublesome times upon those who ultimately do not deserve to receive them. I think it is normal as a Christian to question faith in God from time to time. When my daughter was sick recently, I remember asking God a hundred times why? What did she do to deserve such things? However, it is important to note that while we may question God for his reasons as to why certain things may occur, we do not ultimately rule out the fact that he exist entirely. I think that McCloskey had a few of his ideas on the correct path, but he failed to recognize that the arguments presented were just the most basic outline to the question of God’s existence. The teleological and cosmological arguments should be used as starting points and not as the ending arguments to the question. God is not defined, but he is always present and powerful. One should realize that there is only so much knowledge available at hand, and we can only debate so far with what we know. I would argue to McCloskey that I find greater comfort in the knowledge that there is indeed a God, and we are not just the products of some uncontrolled chaos. I choose to believe that God regulates the…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God

    After reviewing McCloskey's article it is clear to say that he wanted to truly appeal to an atheist audience. McCloskey refers to the arguments as "proofs", which means that he is trying to insinuate that these arguments are not scientifically proven and are not based on facts. A proof is a statement that is unquestionable and lead to an end. He also implies that the arguments cannot definitely establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned because this way he can use that term to make the argument that God exists less plausible. Specifically, the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and arguments of design in general cannot be proven and cannot point to an end, but they do provide possible arguments that God does…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Teleological Argument Analysis
    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Teleological Argument Analysis

    There is one prevailing question we ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Every human answer’s that question in their own unique way, which is contingent upon their beliefs, experiences, and influences. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries and each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s argument, “The Teleological Argument,” and how it is disparaged by David Hume and his argument for apparent…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    William Lane Craig argues in Reasonable Faith that, if life ends in a grave, that it does not matter whether someone has been a good or bad person because one’s “destiny” is not related to how a person behaves, thus someone has no motivation to live life as a good person. McCloskey argues that not believing in a God is more comforting when someone you love or yourself is going through a hard time or is suffering from a terrible disease. Rather than believing in a God who is purposely allowing the person to suffer through whatever they are going…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument: A Higher Source Of God
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Teleological Argument: A Higher Source Of God

    So my question to him would be who was the designer if it wasn’t God? McCloskey suggests the only thing we should come to conclusion with based on the teleological argument is that there was a powerful designer (McCloskey, 1968). With this notion in my opinion, McCloskey discredits his own stance by proclaiming an awareness of nature being out of order.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey
    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey

    In my opinion, I believe that McCloskey’s arguments against the existence of God is somewhat biased. By biased I’m inferring that his argument is a one-sided view that attempts to provide proof that God doesn’t exist based on man-made judgments about what an all-powerful, omniscient being can, should, or would do. I conclude that this is unreasonable because as mere humans, we don’t have the capability to understand the magnitude or reasoning of God. Who are we to determine what The Creator should do in any circumstance? That is not our position as humans to do this for God. Preoccupied with what an all-powerful…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Telelogical argument

    Examine the key ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of God?…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Response Paper
    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mccloskey Response Paper

    In his article, On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey tried to show that atheism is a more reasonable and comfortable belief than that of Christianity. McCloskey argued against the three theistic proofs, which are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument and the argument from design. He pointed out the existence of evil in the world that God made. He also pointed out that it is irrational to live by faith. According to McCloskey, proofs do not necessarily play a vital role in the belief of God. Page 62 of the article states that "most theists do not come to believe in God as a basis for religious belief, but come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors." However, he feels that as far as proofs serve theists, the three most commonly accepted are the cosmological, the teleological, and the argument from design. It is important to note that he considers these arguments as reasons to "move ordinary theists to their theism." (McCloskey 1968) This is not necessary the case and contradicts the former statement that most theists do not hold to these proofs. As such, the attempt to dispute these arguments as a reason not to believe in God is almost not worth attempting. If theists do not generally hold to these proofs as reasons for faith, then why bother trying to dispute them to theists? Continuing to do so seems as though he is motivated to prove a point few are not interested in disputing, and thus is purposely trying to set up theist belief as ridiculous; in other words, he is looking to pick to a fight. This is not an intellectual objective article. Bias necessarily forfeits intellectual objectivity.…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Teleological Argument
    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Teleological Argument

    “With such signs of forethought in the design of living creature, can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?” (Socrates) The Design argument looks at the order and purpose, or telos, in the world and states that it implies that there must be a designer who made the world ‘just right’ for human existence. Religious believers go on to state that this designer is God. The argument states that if one uses one’s senses to look at order, such as gravity and the motion of the planets, which exists in the world, it is likely that one will accept that there is a designer God who created the world and gave it this order. Thus, the argument is both a posteriori, based on experience, and inductive, containing a conclusion that we are likely to accept if we believe the premises to be true. Although the argument was one of Aquinas’ five ‘ways’ in his book, Summa Theologica, the most famous version of the Argument from Design was put forward by William Paley in his book Natural Theology (1802), and therefore, this essay will focus mainly on Paley’s version of the argument.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Teleological Argument
    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Teleological Argument

    Teleology is an argument of God’s existence following the evidence of order defined as the design of nature. Teleological arguments also known as arguments from design, explain the order in the universe to the existence of God. The universe is believed to be ordered towards some end or a certain purpose. It is more reasonable to suggest that the universe was created by an intelligent being to accomplish a purpose rather than it being there by chance (McGrath, 2010). The teleological argument has been used to show the existence of God with popular arguments including that of William Paley. Paley used a watch to relate to the order, complexity and purpose of the universe. A watch has a number of ordered parts that work in harmony for an end…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Techsid Argumentative Essay
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Techsid Argumentative Essay

    One of the uncertainties that TechSid faces is the number of competitors within the market. The company would have to offer something different to gain a competitive advantage over its competitors. What is it about TechSid that makes customers choose its products? Is it good customer service, a great return policy, or unique products? A lot of companies offer these benefits, so it is crucial for TechSid to think critically about possible tactics to help separate itself from competitors. It's great to have a goal but realistic steps must be taken to work towards that goal. Furthermore, if the company plans to establish a well-known name, aggressive marketing strategies must be implemented, which can be very expensive.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper
    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Response Paper

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Bertrand Russell: Why I Am Not a Christian
    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bertrand Russell: Why I Am Not a Christian

    He believes that a true Christian is someone who believes in God and immortality and someone who truly believes in Christ and his teachings. Now he begins to gives reasons as to why he is not a true Christian. He begins with the first which is existence of God by using several arguments. The first one is First Cause Argument. It states that everything there is in the world has a cause and a purpose. Everything is made by someone, for example, take a watch, a watch is made by a human but who made humans. We come to a chain where if you go further and further back you come to the First Cause and people have given the First Cause the name of God. So in my example, if humans made watch then god made humans. God is the First cause. He argues here that if God made humans and humans made objects then who made god. If we are to believe this theory then we must believe that someone must have made god. The question is who made god. He is not trying to prove that there is no god he just believes that it is our minds and imagination that came up with the fact that everything in this world has a beginning. "There is no reason to suppose that the world had a beginning at all," (Russell, 24). I agree with his theory on the First Cause Argument. Not everything has a beginning because if we were to look at it deeper then nobody knows that God actually exists except for what's written in books by people many years ago. Even if he does exist according to the theory we should also know how god was…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics