Preview

Technology advances in Han and Roman societies

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Technology advances in Han and Roman societies
Many people throughout time had different outlooks or opinions on technological advances. The outlook differed on people in each civilization. According to written articles, civilizations either were for or against technology; in some cases, they had pro and con opinions depending on when, and/or who wrote the article on their attitude towards technology.
First, people had a favoring attitude towards technology. This means that people took the technology and made it useful rather than ignoring it. This is best demonstrated by History of the Early Han Dynasty, who says that the governor, who was appointed in 31 C.E., invented a water-powered-blowing-engine and it increased the amount of labor in a small amount of time. People took the invention and built on it and used it often. He says this because people enjoyed the fact that they did not have to work as much. This is further demonstrated by Huan Tan, an upper-class Han philosopher, by explaining the invention of pestle and mortar, and how the benefit was increased a hundredfold. Another man with a similar opinion is Plutarch, a Greek-born Roman citizen and high official, by describing how it was easier for people to mount their horses.
However, with positive attitudes, there comes some negative ones towards technology too. This means that people did not take the new inventions for granted and just ignored them. This is best demonstrated by Seneca, an upper-class Roman philosopher and adviser to Emperor Nero, who says that he believed that tools were not invented by wise men. He says this because it was not important to him and he did not pay attention to which invention came first. This is further explained by Huan Guan, a Han government official, who says that workers, before he wrote this, were able to produce with the tools they had their selves; but workers during the period when he was writing this, were forced to work with tools given to them by the state and they were crude. He says this because work

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Around times ranging from the first century B.C.E all the way to the first century C.E. two large cultures with slightly differing opinions pertaining to technology were those of Han China and Rome. While Rome, a civilization set upon expansion and conquest; saw little need for adaptive technology lest it aided in the plundering lifestyle Rome’s economy was based upon, Han China was much more tolerant towards advancements in technology even as they preferred a more traditional lifestyle. The two main branches of technology presented through the documents include: Technology introduced by governing bodies/officials, and technology innovated by the common consumer.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were two very large empires. Both of these empires were considered golden ages in one form or another. Han was considered a Golden Age in general because of its length and prosperity, while Rome also promoted prosperity it was mainly the Golden Age of Latin Literature. These empires were similar technologically while different politically.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were two of the most powerful civilizations of their era. From a few centuries B.C.E. to a couple centuries after C.E., these empires significantly enhanced their cultures with advancements in technology, but differed in their views of technologies importance and how it was valued. The Han Empire was much more worried about how technology could be advanced to ease the workload of the common man while increasing efficiency, where as the Roman Empire viewed technology as something they were happy to benefit from, but not to be exalted. Even though both civilizations had great technological achievements, they differed greatly in their attitudes toward these achievements and their effects on the laborer, the environment, and manufacturing.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China had both similar and different characteristics about their empires, while existing at the same time. While thousands of miles separated Rome and Han China, neither influenced the other. They both lasted approximately 400 years, with populations of about 50 million. The Roman Empire encompassed all the land that surrounded the Mediterranean Sea, as well as large portions of Continental Europe and the Middle East. The Han Empire however, stretched from the Pacific ocean to the oases of Central Asia.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hans and the Romans Dbq

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial administration in Imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E and Han China from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. had both their similarities and differences. Similarities include general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. One major difference is the method of political control with religion, and the way their leaders were selected.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This provided the Han with tax revenue. Combine this with a wide variety of other revenue from tribute, silk, iron, salt, and wine and a powerful economy emerged, which led to a strong military. At the base of Han society was a free peasant class who owned and worked their own land. These peasants could be rewarded for their productivity.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Again, Han had an approving approach to technology in contrast to the rather negative views of the Romans. In History of the Early Han Dynasty, Tu Shih a governor of Nanyang, was described as a very supportive and popular person among the common people. Tu Shih had invented a water-powered blowing engine for the casting of iron agricultural implements that allowed people to enjoy great benefit for little labor. The book also says that the invention was widely adopted and used. This book doesn’t say much about technology but it shows that it was embraced by the common people and had beneficial values. Unlike Han, the Roman political leader Cicero takes a very degrading view of technology. He specifically bashes on the craftworkers, saying that the jobs hired workers took on are vulgar and unbecoming to a gentleman. According to him, all craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations and no workshop would have enlightening about it. This proves that Cicero believed there was nothing that men who made technology should be proud of, which contrasted greatly with Han…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Chinese attitude towards technology was that it should be useful to and help the common people. The Roman attitude towards technology was that it was it was of little prestige and didn't relate to the upper classes and was therefore of less importance.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This source is helpful because it talks about the Mesolithic Era in Africa and its pottery.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics