Syros: A Brief Analysis Of The Aegean Art
The first art that I am going to describe from the Aegean art is figurine of s women, from Syros. It was made between the years 2600-2300 BCE. I noticed that this art is unique in two different ways, first line, this piece of art of a women is highly abstract. The female figure is frontal and very compact. The limps are folded. There is no space between the arms and the body. The same think with the legs. They are attached together. The body is stand still with no motion. Although it the head is in an angle and the nick in another and the body complicated. The body still look flat from a distance. What make this art more unique is the simplicity of the art when it comes to textures. The art surface isn’t smooth in fact it has tiny hold all
…show more content…
It is male harp player, from Keros. It was made between the years 2600-2300 BCE. My second art pieces is a sculptor as well from Etruscans, it’s sarcophagus of Lars Pulena. It was made in 200 BCE. Although both of this are male sculpture, they are different. I will compare these two sculpture from two different areas technique and style. I n the first sculpture male harp player, we notice that the face and the body are over simplify and highly abstract which makes it flat. In the other hand sarcophagus figure is carved in and out which add a lot of details to the face and body. Another major different is technique, while male harp player we see that the head, the neck, and the body appear to be different pieces attached together, sarcophagus is flawless, the head, the neck and the body appear to be one …show more content…
The first piece is the Helios and his horses, and Dionysus. It was made between the years 438-432 BCE. My second pieces is heroic portrait of Trebonianus Gallus. It was made between 251-253 CE. I will compare these two piece from two areas media and historical impact. In the first piece Helios and his horses, and Dionysus the artist used marble to depict the birth of the goddess, in the other hand in heroic portrait of Trebonianus Gallus the artist used bronze to depict a heroically nude status. Another major different between the two pieces is that in the Helios and his horses, and Dionysus, THE ARTIST depict the witness of a very important event in the era which is the birth of Athena. In the other hand the artis of heroic portrait of trebonianus Gallus depicted a roman emperor who rules with his son Volusianus
In this paragraph I will compare and contrast a church from the Roman Empire which is Frigidaire, bath of Diocletian which was made in 298-306. And a church from the 20th century which is Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church, which was made in 1956. Although both of this building are church were people go to pray and practice their religion, they are different in style. Frigidaire, bath of Diocletian church is high and has a doom in the middle. But Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church is simple modern flat
It is male harp player, from Keros. It was made between the years 2600-2300 BCE. My second art pieces is a sculptor as well from Etruscans, it’s sarcophagus of Lars Pulena. It was made in 200 BCE. Although both of this are male sculpture, they are different. I will compare these two sculpture from two different areas technique and style. I n the first sculpture male harp player, we notice that the face and the body are over simplify and highly abstract which makes it flat. In the other hand sarcophagus figure is carved in and out which add a lot of details to the face and body. Another major different is technique, while male harp player we see that the head, the neck, and the body appear to be different pieces attached together, sarcophagus is flawless, the head, the neck and the body appear to be one …show more content…
The first piece is the Helios and his horses, and Dionysus. It was made between the years 438-432 BCE. My second pieces is heroic portrait of Trebonianus Gallus. It was made between 251-253 CE. I will compare these two piece from two areas media and historical impact. In the first piece Helios and his horses, and Dionysus the artist used marble to depict the birth of the goddess, in the other hand in heroic portrait of Trebonianus Gallus the artist used bronze to depict a heroically nude status. Another major different between the two pieces is that in the Helios and his horses, and Dionysus, THE ARTIST depict the witness of a very important event in the era which is the birth of Athena. In the other hand the artis of heroic portrait of trebonianus Gallus depicted a roman emperor who rules with his son Volusianus
In this paragraph I will compare and contrast a church from the Roman Empire which is Frigidaire, bath of Diocletian which was made in 298-306. And a church from the 20th century which is Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church, which was made in 1956. Although both of this building are church were people go to pray and practice their religion, they are different in style. Frigidaire, bath of Diocletian church is high and has a doom in the middle. But Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church is simple modern flat