Preview

Summary Of What Is It Like To Be A Bat

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of What Is It Like To Be A Bat
1. Are you a dreamer?
The meditator determines that there is not a reliable test to determine if you are dreaming or not (EP 88). The meditator comes to this conclusion by first noting that all of his knowledge has been derived from or through his senses (EP 88 middle). The mediator then realizes that sometimes his senses give him wrong information, so he cannot trust them on the grounds that his senses could be feeding him more false information (EP 88 middle). To further his idea that his senses cannot be trusted, the meditator notes that he perceives similar scenarios when he is sleeping to those he has when he is awake, so how can he determine if he is awake and experiencing something real or if he is dreaming? (EP 88-9).
However, the
…show more content…
Thomas Nagel starts to make an argument for this theory in his essay. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? In his essay, Nagel tries to imagine what it would be like to be a bat. He determines it is impossible to accurately imagine the scenario because what our brains are able to imagine is limited (EP 139 bottom). Our imagination is limited by what our minds know and experience (EP 139 middle). The experiences of our mind are “accessible only from one point of view,” (EP 141 middle). On a more related note, a person, who has decent hearing capabilities is not able to imagine what it would be like to be deaf because he never experienced it. His mind has only experienced being able to hear and therefore it cannot imagine being unable to hear. The point of view, or the experiences known, comes from the body which the mind resides in. Thus, for a mind have experiences, it must be a part of the body it is …show more content…
A previous chain of events, which one has no control over, has led to the occurrence of a specific event. Determinists believe that there is no free will, instead, every single action made is fixed. Within determinism, there are two sets of ideas: soft determinism and hard determinism. Both types believe the idea that all actions must occur based on previous events. Hard determinism is the belief that there is never any free will (EP 171 middle). Hard determinists believe in incompatibilism, which is the idea that freedom and determinism cannot exist at the same time (EP 171 middle). On the other hand, soft determinists believe in compatibilism, the idea that freedom and determinism can exist at the same time (EP 167 top). So, soft determinists believe in determinism, but they also believe that people have freedom (EP 173 top). As defined in class, freedom is a person’s moral responsibility, not to be confused with the ability to choose your actions, which would be free will (Class lecture 10/24/14). Soft determinists believe that people’s actions are predetermined, but people are still morally responsible for those

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When it comes to determinism and free will, there are two categories which determinists would side with. Either they are a soft or a hard determinist. Determinism is defined as the theory that “everything in the universe..is entirely determined by causal laws, so that whatever happens at any given moment is the effect of some antecedent cause” (Pojman & Fieser, Free Will and Determinism, p. 388). In this essay, I will be reviewing philosopher Baron d'Holbach's arguments against the concept of free will in the perspective of a hard determinist.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Suppose that causal determinism obtains and I do X at time t. It follows from the definition of causal determinism that the facts about the past, together with the laws of nature, entail that I do X at t. For me to refrain from doing X at t, either the past (with respect to t) or natural laws (or both) would have to be different. But the past and the natural laws are not up to me or in my control: I am not free so to act that the past or natural laws (or both) are different. Therefore, if causal determinism is true, then (despite my sense of my own freedom) I am not able to refrain from what I actually do—I do not have the sort of control that involves genuine access to alternative possibilities (Fischer,…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “How often have I dreamt that I was in these familiar circumstances that I was dressed, and occupied this place by the fire, when I was lying undressed in bed?” Rene Descartes in his writings from Meditations on First Philosophy brings to us this very reason of doubt of our senses and perceptions. For we have all “been deceived in sleep by similar illusions” (Descartes) placing the question, how would we “know the difference between the dream world and the real world?”(Synopsis: The Matrix)…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP PSYCH

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This paper explore lucid dreaming. Although the concept of ‘lucid dreaming’ was first coined by a Dutch psychiatrist known as Frederik Willems van Eeden and introduced at the meeting of The Society for Psychical Research held on April 22 of 1913, the phenomenon of lucid dreaming was already known in earlier historical periods, and its descriptions can be found in writings of Aristotle; however, modern lucid dreaming research was established only after LaBerge introduced his method for physiological investigation of lucid dreaming through eye signals in 1980. Lucid dreamers often report being in possession of all their cognitive faculties: they are able to reason clearly, to remember the conditions of waking life, and to act voluntarily within the dream upon reflection or in accordance with plans decided upon before sleep. This paper also goes into many uses of lucid dreaming. It was especially cultivated in Tibetan Buddhism and is known in Sufism and Indian yoga. The final goal was to be able to maintain consciousness in the event of death so that one could consciously encounter the path to the other world. Recurrent nightmares have been shown to be alleviated by lucid dream induction, though it remains unclear whether this alleviation is because of lucidity itself or the ability to alter some aspect of the dream. Blagrove, Farmer and Williams found that lucid dreaming reduced nightmare suffering, but nightmare frequency remained unchanged. Lucid dreaming is still being studied to this day. Current attempts in the field are directed at defining the neuro-physiological correlates of lucid dreaming, an aim that still has not been achieved. Other possible therapeutic potentials of lucid dreaming are still in the process of being discovered and constitute a fertile area for future researchers.…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hard determinism states that all events have causes and that we cannot be free as a result. Soft determinism, however, responds to this pessimistic conclusion by asserting that we can indeed have free will and still exist by the deterministic model in which all events have causes. Hard determinism correlates "cause" with "force" or "compulsion" and "free" with "total control," whereas soft determinism correlates "free" with "voluntary" or "not forced." Thus soft determinism's definitions of words more strongly agree with average, everyday usage.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The same people who believe that they are freely making choices also believe that the world has come to the point it is at because of past events. The world is a giant web of causes and effects. Hard determinists argue that because everything has a cause, no decision is made freely. Instead, every choice and action ever made is the result of a preceding event or events that led to the action. Advocates of libertarian free will explain this by noting the difference between the events of the world from events in the mind, or thoughts. Events that occur in the world are deterministic, with everything having a cause and effect. Libertarian free will draws the line at the human mind. It says that the mind makes its own decisions and create an entirely new set of causes in the physical world. This debate begins to focus on whether or not the human mind is capable of making its own decisions, something to which new technology and science are giving new insight. For the past 50 years or so, neuroscience has come to the conclusion that the brain does not make its own decisions, but uses past events and experiences to determine which action is…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Examined

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This statement is true. For if hard determinism is true, then our actions are determined. Meaning that we have no control over our own actions. Therefore, we cannot be held responsible for out actions, because, we are not responsible for them, for they were determined. If this is indeed true, then the worlds judicial systems have been making mistakes for several thousands of years.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the beginning of the article he tried desperately to find a solution for this thoughts and even his own existence, he even tried to pretend that his own thoughts were illusions of his dreams and his own existence was even questioned. “(Book Review …Eli Bendersky… Oct. 28, 2008).…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Well, breaking it down that is not what free will defines. Free will is the ability to make his or her own decision. To some extent determinism (not to be confused with hard determinism) and free will can both collaborate together making our world. Yes, something had to create us, but when we are born we are born with a desire to follow our hearts. We are designed to have our own free will. Although it may seem like hard determinism derails free will's argument it is an incorrect accusation at a completely different topic not in relation to free will. If we used hard determinism, that would mean that no one is held accountable to their actions or morals. With their philosophy it would mean that everything was planned out and whatever happens was planned to happen. So with that in mind it does not matter if I steal because it was supposed to happen, etc. I believe God gave us free will to further the Kingdom of God, and because He wants us to choose Him, not be forced to love…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Determinism

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hard determinism is a theory in philosophy addressing the issue of causal determinism, also known as determinism, and human free will. Hard determinism holds that Determinism is true, that a given event or action requires antecedent conditions that directly influence that action and dictate its outcome. Hard determinism is consistent in that for every event to be causally…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the reading, Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, we learned that we have no control over our behaviors because they are made up of our beliefs and desires, which are influenced by our genes and environment. For instance in the reading we are compared to a computer, our behavior is the result of your beliefs and desires just as a computer’s behavior is the result of its programming (Sober). The program within the computer is our genetic code. Then a hard determinist would create this argument, P1) Free choices require that the agent can choose from more than one possible option. P2) Our…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard determinists believe that every event has a cause, therefore, no one can act freely. In the video, Free Will and Determinism, the speaker states that society, upbringing, culture, and environment all play key roles as to how we feel emotionally. These four concepts interfere with our lives, and establish our actions. In addition, Honderich offers, “It is not merely a chance [External situations that may occur] or random event.” Hard determinists believe we have unknown forces acting upon us that cause us to act in a certain way. Everything that happens to us has already been mapped out and we are forced to live the life we have been given. In contrast, soft determinist believe that every event has a cause.This results in the person being free (Vaughn, Lewis, and Theodore Schick, Jr.). As described in the video, Freewill and Determinism, soft determinists believe in two types of causes: internal causes and external causes.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would lean more towards the compatibilist view stating, unless I am the cause of my actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion of free will. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to articulate a compatibilist position believing that although the person is free to act on their motive, the motive is determined. In other words, he says “Everything we choose to do is strictly determined by the need to relieve the physical pressures of our bodies. Humans…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    return, calls all other things into doubt. He first asks himself “what can I know for certain?” Once this question is answered, this will be his foundation for a whole new set of beliefs. The meditator’s first argument is the argument of illusion. He states that everything he knows he has learned from his senses. The senses for the meditator, and most people, have deceived before whether it is smelling something that really isn’t what you think it is, or seeing something far away and getting closer and it is not what you thought it was. The meditator thinks that if his senses have deceived him once, then they could be fooling him all the time. After simmering the thought, he concludes that his senses only deceive him when it comes to small or far away objects. The meditator then brings in the fact that insane people have these deceiving moments a lot which makes them considered insane. Insane people have very wildly insane beliefs about large present matters. Then it is as if the meditator has a feeling that if his senses deceive him like that, then maybe he could be insane which concludes all your beliefs are subject to doubt. However, after contemplating this argument of illusion and insanity, Decartes dismisses it because it is insane.…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theodore Roethke’s poem ‘The Bat’ clearly focuses on the animal the bat and effectively conveys through the latter an important message to the reader. One could interpret this poem in various ways; however a prominent theme would be that every being on earth has a ‘dark side’ which is often overlooked. The speaker’s tone in the poem varies and seems to have two very distinct sections; at the beginning it is light, playful and appreciative of the animal, however as the poem progresses one can sense the tone becoming mysterious, calm and increasingly alerting. This shift in tone has an impact on the reader and emphasizes the importance of the message conveyed.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays