Preview

Summary Of Regan's Response To Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Regan's Response To Animal Testing
Regan would deny the request to use dogs to research a cure for heroin addiction. He holds the belief that animals have rights and they don't belong in laboratories. Regan believes that no matter how much could be benefitted from using an animal, they should not be held against their will. He advocated that the reason animals have rights is because, they, like humans, have the ability to feel pain and pleasure. Therefore, Regan believed that humans’ and animals’ lives are of equal importance. Conducting research on an animal is morally impermissible according to Regan.

Kant would accept the request to use dogs to research a cure for heroin. To Kant, humans have indirect duties to animals. He believes that it’s in a human’s interest to animals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Animal Testing Paradox “Earth was created for all life, not just human life. ”-Anthony Douglas Williams. Animal abuse can take forms in several different ways. One of the main ways that animals are mistreated is by cosmetic testing. The extremities of this topic have been kept out of the public eye for decades.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it possible to respect the rights of animals and eat them for dinner too? According to animal equality website, with the exception of fish, “over 56 billion farmed animals are slaughtered every year by humans.” Tom Regan writes in The Case for Animal Rights, what’s “fundamentally wrong with the way animals are treated” [….] “is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us — to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sport or money.” (Regan 13) With this harsh reality in mind, Regan calls for a total abolition of the use of animals in science, commercial animal agriculture, and commercial sport hunting and trapping.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing on cosmetics should be banned. People are put in jail all the time for abusing their pets, but people are never put in jail for inhumane testing of cosmetics and other pharmaceuticals on these same animals. I have done a lot of research on animal testing and methods we can use that are more effective and don’t use animals through high school in my free time because of curiosity, so I know a lot of random facts about the harmful nature of this and alternative methods. Animals are being tortured to “help” make better medicine and, the majority of the time does not affect people the same way as animals. Animal testing is inhumane and ineffective the majority of the time, it should be banned.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unethical Animal Testing

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every year millions of animals are used in more than 1,000 laboratory experiments across the country. The facilities imprison millions of animals and exhaust millions of dollars to cause pain and suffering that are irrelevant to the diagnosis of the human well-being. Universities, hospitals, contract laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, and government agencies contribute to unethical animal testing. The cruel living conditions and senseless torture of these animals goes unnoticed by the majority of worldwide citizens. It is important that we bring this heinous practice to the attention of those who are unaware of these unethical procedures.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why would somebody want to abuse or hurt animals for no reason? Animals are locked up, tortured, and killed all over the world due to chemical experiments for products. Animal testing should be banned because it endangers animals and does not serve a legitimate purpose in society.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation is a highly controversial subject throughout the world and in the 20th century the public has become increasingly aware of the two sides to animal testing. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to 384-322 BCE and it is still a common practice to this day. There are a few disagreements that are highly debated about animal experimentation such as the importance of the testing for scientific and medical goals, the suffering of the animals, and the ethical principles that apply to animals. Both sides of animal experimentation have their reasons and facts for why animal testing is ethical or unethical, but it comes down to the amount of pain the animals suffers and if it is morally correct.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel getting chemicals dropped into your eyes and on your skin, being confined into a small cell waiting to be tortured? Now why is it fair to do this to animals? There are so many reasons why animals should not be used for scientific research. Animal testing is unethical, and completely immoral. Not to mention it is unnecessary and there are many newly developed options that avoid animal cruelty. Additionally, animal testing has been proven to be ineffective and inaccurate.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal testing has been going on for a couple of years now. Scientists use animal testing as a form of “safe” testing. According to Humane Society International, animal testing is, “Procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into the basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals. (1)” Many companies use animal testing because it is easier, or more ethical, to…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    *95% of animals used for experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act, the only act governing animal testing. Laws protecting animals need to include test animals used for experiments and these laws should be more strongly enforced. In order to minimize the number of animals used for testing and make sure they are not mistreated, the laws need to make it harder for researchers to use animals, making alternatives more appealing.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing Controversy

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When shopping at a store, no one ever thinks when he or she buys makeup, cleaning products, deodorant or lotion, that it has potentially hurt an innocent animal. In fact, millions of animals die every year due to a chemical drug. Those animals harmed never got a chance to live a normal, animal life; instead, they were put into cages and locked up for years at a time. While animal testing can be used to ensure the safety of certain drugs for humans, potentially killing or harming the animal being tested deems this practice wrong because it is immoral to kill or injure an innocent animal.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant felt that humans have no duty to animals. He stated ““Animals are not self-conscious and are there merely as a means to an end. The end is man.” According to Immanuel Kant, humans have no direct duties to animals. Kant’s moral view of animals is that if it benefits humankind then the right of the animal should have no regard at all. Kant believed in science, he believed that if an animal had a scientific…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Balls, Michael. “Alternatives to Animal Testing: Toward Reducing Uncertainty and Unintended Consequences.” AATEX 16.3 (2011): 101-110…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays