Preview

Animal Testing Controversy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1872 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing Controversy
Animal Testing Controversy When shopping at a store, no one ever thinks when he or she buys makeup, cleaning products, deodorant or lotion, that it has potentially hurt an innocent animal. In fact, millions of animals die every year due to a chemical drug. Those animals harmed never got a chance to live a normal, animal life; instead, they were put into cages and locked up for years at a time. While animal testing can be used to ensure the safety of certain drugs for humans, potentially killing or harming the animal being tested deems this practice wrong because it is immoral to kill or injure an innocent animal. An animal being subjected to testing is not fair; that animal did nothing wrong to deserve to be treated as an experiment. Like humans, animals are creatures living and breathing on this world too. How is it acceptable that creatures almost equal to us humans are treated like scum? Stated in the article “Controversy of Animal Testing” by Ian Murnaghan, “One key argument against animal testing involves the inability of animals to consent to the tests. Humans... can make an informed decision to consent while animals have tests forced upon them, with no choice.” As Murnaghan said, animals do not have the choice to decide whether they’ll be tested on or not, for they are obviously unable to speak. However, given the opportunity for an animal to have a voice, the likelihood that they’d reject the proposal of a test is highly likely. During an animal test, it may involve pain, suffering and discomfort. Although researchers try their best to minimize the pain, they aren 't able to completely prevent any from happening. For the reason that an innocent animal is suffering against their free will, animal testing should be eliminated for the testing of drugs and other substances. All beings respond differently to various kinds of drugs and chemicals applied on them for testing. Since they react in so many different ways, it is very hard to


Cited: "Cruelty to Animals in Laboratories." Peta.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. . Feder, Barnaby J. "Saving the Animals: New Ways to Test Products." The New York Times. The New York Times, 12 Sept. 2007. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. . Murnaghan, Ian. "Controversy of Animal Testing." Controversy of Animal Testing. N.p., 14 Dec. 2010. Web. 7 Oct. 2012. . Murnaghan, Ian. "Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons." Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons. N.p., 1 July 2011. Web. 7 Oct. 2012. . Suzy Woodell October 15, 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animals are usually confined to small cages and being exposed to harmful fumes for human benefit.In their “Animal” Journal, Elisabeth H. Ormandy and Catherine Schuppli claim that "the use of animals in research fosters a diverse range of attitudes, with some people expressing the desire for complete abolition of animal research practices, while others express strong support (392)." Animal testing has stirred up an argument between two opposing sides regarding the ethics of the practice. The two opposing sides are those who disagree with animal testing and those who agree with animal testing. Nuno Henrique Franco author of "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective" state that "Animal experimentation has played a central role in biomedical research throughout history. For centuries, however, it has also been an issue of heated public and philosophical discussion."(238) Those who are in favor of animal testing believe that it is beneficial to improving medicine. Those who are against animal testing believe that it is harmful to animals and that their are other ways to benefit humans. Being an animal lover, I oppose of animal testing for several different reasons. The first reason being animals are being subjected to all forms of suffering and isolation. The second reason is animals are not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you ever wonder how beauty products and medical treatment are get the seal of approval for human use? Today many beauty and health manufactures validate their product through animal testing. These poor and defenseless creatures are being held in steel cold cages waiting to be performed on to advance human life. Animal testing should be terminated because the animals live in fear and pain, violates their rights and other methods are available to accurate data for products and…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The world does not need another eyeliner, hand soap, food ingredient, drug for erectile dysfunction, or pesticide so badly that it should come at the expense of animals’ lives” (Top five). Animals are being wasted every year by testing them on useless products that are not necessary. In addition, the animals are killed at the end of each test, thus, thousands of animals die with pain. The tests the animals receive are inhumane. “To test rabbits for development of toxicity, a pregnant rabbit is taken and exposed by force feeding, throughout her pregnancy. She is killed on the day she is expected to give birth. Her babies are extracted and evaluated for birth defects” (Cosmetic). These types of testing are morally wrong.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personhood for Primates

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Animal Testing." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 1 Sept. 2000. Web. 2 Dec. 2011. .…

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To test cosmetics, household cleaners and other consumer products hundreds of thousands of animals are poisoned, blinded and killed every year by cruel corporations. In my opinion we should not even be doing this at all, it is very wrong.Thousands of animals are killed everyday due to this torture. Animals have feelings too. Toothpaste is even tested on animals. It’s ridiculous. According to the human society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of 12,000 animals. The animals are tested for 2 years.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Alternatives to Animal Testing." People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Web. 25 Apr. 2012. .…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exploratory Paper

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Experimentation plays an important role in today’s medical and pharmaceutical advances, but many question the morality of such a use of animal life. Whether you argue that testing different products and drugs on animals is necessary or not, this has become an integral part of developing products. From that Tylenol you pop to get rid of your headache, to that perfect shade of pink lip gloss, animal testing is used in order to produce the simplest household items. Today, in the United States, it is federal law that requires all pharmaceuticals, food additives, cosmetics, and garden chemicals to undergo a series of tests, including animal testing, before being available to general public. It is estimated between fifty and a hundred million vertebrate animals worldwide are being used fro animal experiments. While many believe that animal experimentation is a crucial part of research and safety, others argue the morality of this issue. Another point of view some share is a mixture of both opposing views, where one believes that animal experimentation should only be condoned in the field of medical research but not for vanity reasons.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each year in the United States, an estimated seventy million animals are hurt and killed in the name of science by private institutions, household products and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Animal testing is wrong and downright mean. Innocent animals should not be treated badly and caused pain for the sake of a human 's safety. Many people think animal testing is good while others think it is wrong. I think it is completely and absolutely wrong. Some people argue that humans are not necessarily superior to animals, so why should animals be experimented on and made to suffer to protect human beings? Do you know what animal testing is, what condition the animals live in, and what some alternatives to testing animals are?…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use. It is this aspect of animal testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal testing has been around for centuries, when it really should be one of those “cruel memories” of things we have done in the past, but will not let in happen again in the future. Rats, Mice, Rabbits, and a whole slew of other animals are forced to endure massive quantities of testing substances or endure pain by having harmful chemicals applied to their bodies, even though the testing may…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal drugs, which made their way to public animals, kill approximately one hundred thousand people per year, and because more illegal drugs combined and cost the general public over one hundred thirty-six billion dollars in health care expenses (Greek). This amount of money could be saved if animal testing would come to a standstill. “The care and upkeep of primates other than chimpanzees are twenty to twenty-five dollars per day” (Conlee). The money would be more useful if it was not put towards animal testing where animal testing does not always work and is inconclusive. “The only U.S. law that governs the use of animals in laboratories – the Animal Welfare Act – allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged (Berlatsky). This would be awful to do to a human, in fact, it is illegal. Then why should this be legal to do to animals when animals feel the same as a human. Undergoing animal testing and not doing anything about it is shameful. People know what happens to animals while this testing accrues but it needs to come to a standstill. The United States already puts too much money into this testing just for animals to be tortured. Because rats and mice are not protected by the law, experimenters do not have to provide them with pain relief (Berlatsky). The amount of money put into this animal testing for the results to not be what they wanted is shocking. The animal testing is cruel to animals and needs to be put under animal…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cruelty on Animal Testing

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Animal testing is wrong and it is cruelty to animals. Each year about five million dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and other animals die in lethal dose tests performed in many states of the United States” (mega essays). Every year, an animal dies in an experiment in the United States. Can you imagine how many of these poor creatures die every day all around the world? Scientists and researchers cruelly experiment on the innocent lives of non-human animals. Animal experimentation is not only cruel, horrific, and heartbreaking it is also useless. “Ninety-four percent of animal testing is done to determine the safety of cosmetics and household products. That only leaves six percent for medical research. The saving of one life cannot be justified by the killing of another” (Stop Animal testing). During the lethal dose tests the experimental are forced into the animal’s throats, or pumped into their stomachs by a tube. This causes death by stomach rupture or from chemical dosage. Another way that animals are experimented is by injecting under their skin, often applied to the eyes, and inhaled through a gas mask.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Ian Murnaghan, M.Sc, on his piece, “The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing,” the majority of the scientific society is strongly for animal testing. They see that humans are superior to animal life (Murnaghan). This belief justifies the use of animals in testing. The unfortunate truth, however, is that a lot of these creatures go…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our society we place great importance on safety, on a daily basis we take precautions to protect ourselves from things that can harm us. We have to be sure that everything we put in our bodies, put on our bodies and just about everything that we come in contact with is as safe as possible for us. The use of animal testing has helped aid society in being sure that products are safe for humans to use; whether that be food products, cosmetics, household cleaners, or even pharmaceuticals. But in our efforts to shield ourselves and our families from harm, who or what has been hurt in the process. Animal testing is an important component in the development of products intended for human use; however, animal testing subjects innocent animals to…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Murnaghan, I. (2010c, 9 December 2010). Using Animals for Testing: Pros vs cons, from http://www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons.html…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics