Stem Cell Controversial
Jordan Groves
Professor White
ENC 1101 Sec-19
11/23/15
Analytical Essay #4
Analytical Essay: Why Is Stem Cell Research so Controversial?
In 2001, President George W. Bush cut funding for research on stem cell obtained from human embryos because it is technology that requires the destruction of human life "My position on this issue is shaped by deeply held beliefs. I also believe human life is a sacred gift from our creator" (Bush, George W., Crawford, Texas, Thursday, August 9, 2001. Stem cell research speech.) His policy restricted the government funding of stem cells. These are utility cells with the potential to develop into various cell types throughout the body. They play an important role in the maintenance and reparation of the body. They can divide without limit to replenish other cells as long as the person is alive. Stem cells have unlimited potential when it comes to curing diseases such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and, Arthritis. The only problem is that getting stem cell requires the destruction of a human embryo. This issue creates a moral dilemma between the duty to alleviate the suffering of others versus the duty to respect the value of human life. What decides which moral …show more content…
Whether or not we should sacrifice the seeds of our next generation to help many in the future." (Bush, George W., Crawford, Texas, Thursday, August 9, 2001. Stem cell research speech.) While all the viewpoints may all have varying standpoints on the moral responsibilities. The true controversy comes from the question When does life actually begin? It seems like we won't ever know. In 2001 when George W. Bush stem cell policy cut off federal funding with the exception of 60 stem cell lines that already exist. This was his way of promoting the sanctity of life without undermining it, while allowing scientist to explore this research's potential to assist those suffering from
Professor White
ENC 1101 Sec-19
11/23/15
Analytical Essay #4
Analytical Essay: Why Is Stem Cell Research so Controversial?
In 2001, President George W. Bush cut funding for research on stem cell obtained from human embryos because it is technology that requires the destruction of human life "My position on this issue is shaped by deeply held beliefs. I also believe human life is a sacred gift from our creator" (Bush, George W., Crawford, Texas, Thursday, August 9, 2001. Stem cell research speech.) His policy restricted the government funding of stem cells. These are utility cells with the potential to develop into various cell types throughout the body. They play an important role in the maintenance and reparation of the body. They can divide without limit to replenish other cells as long as the person is alive. Stem cells have unlimited potential when it comes to curing diseases such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and, Arthritis. The only problem is that getting stem cell requires the destruction of a human embryo. This issue creates a moral dilemma between the duty to alleviate the suffering of others versus the duty to respect the value of human life. What decides which moral …show more content…
Whether or not we should sacrifice the seeds of our next generation to help many in the future." (Bush, George W., Crawford, Texas, Thursday, August 9, 2001. Stem cell research speech.) While all the viewpoints may all have varying standpoints on the moral responsibilities. The true controversy comes from the question When does life actually begin? It seems like we won't ever know. In 2001 when George W. Bush stem cell policy cut off federal funding with the exception of 60 stem cell lines that already exist. This was his way of promoting the sanctity of life without undermining it, while allowing scientist to explore this research's potential to assist those suffering from